User: jpmcc Date: 2008-10-29 18:35:34+0000 Modified: marketing/www/planet/atom.xml marketing/www/planet/index.html marketing/www/planet/opml.xml marketing/www/planet/rss10.xml marketing/www/planet/rss20.xml
Log: Planet run at Wed Oct 29 18:34:58 GMT 2008 File Changes: Directory: /marketing/www/planet/ ================================= File [changed]: atom.xml Url: http://marketing.openoffice.org/source/browse/marketing/www/planet/atom.xml?r1=1.1098&r2=1.1099 Delta lines: +32 -30 --------------------- --- atom.xml 2008-10-29 18:00:40+0000 1.1098 +++ atom.xml 2008-10-29 18:35:31+0000 1.1099 @@ -5,10 +5,33 @@ <link rel="self" href="http://marketing.openoffice.org/planet/atom.xml"/> <link href="http://marketing.openoffice.org/planet/"/> <id>http://marketing.openoffice.org/planet/atom.xml</id> - <updated>2008-10-29T18:00:32+00:00</updated> + <updated>2008-10-29T18:35:24+00:00</updated> <generator uri="http://www.planetplanet.org/">Planet/2.0 +http://www.planetplanet.org</generator> <entry xml:lang="en"> + <title type="html">2.4.2 - the real story</title> + <link href="http://www.mealldubh.org/index.php/2008/10/29/242-the-real-story/"/> + <id>http://www.mealldubh.org/?p=598</id> + <updated>2008-10-29T18:29:50+00:00</updated> + <content type="html"><p>There has been comment <a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=2085">in various blogs</a> about new security vulnerabilities in <a href="http://www.openoffice.org">OpenOffice.org</a>. Some of these posts and the comments on them are completely bizarre. So here&#8217;s the real story.</p> +<p>The OpenOffice.org security team were alerted to a couple of potential vulnerabilities in the code. I&#8217;ve blogged about this process many times before - there&#8217;s no suggestion that anyone has ever tried to exploit these vulnerabilities, or even that it is possible to do so. But we went ahead and fixed the code - as you do.</p> +<p>As <a href="http://www.openoffice.org/security/bulletin.html">the security bulletin</a> states, the recently released OpenOffice.org 3.0 isn&#8217;t affected. However, there are people out there who haven&#8217;t moved on to 3.0 - maybe they are using some add-on that isn&#8217;t yet available for 3.0; maybe they just don&#8217;t use version n.0 of anything on principle. Anyway, to cater for these users, we decided to do a new release 2.4.2 which fixes the vulnerabilities and has a pile of miscellaneous fixes in it for good measure.</p> +<p>We were all set to announce 2.4.2 this morning at the same time as announcing the vulnerabilities (that&#8217;s the recommended way of doing these things). Unfortunately the Bouncer service that we use to redirect downloads to local mirrors hasn&#8217;t picked up the new version, so people can&#8217;t actually download 2.4.2 from <a href="http://download.openoffice.org">our download page</a>.</p> +<p>So, please bear with us. As soon as the good people who run the Bouncer for us (and for several other open-source projects like Mozilla) have got it fixed, we&#8217;ll make the public announcement that 2.4.2 is available.</p></content> + <author> + <name>John McCreesh</name> + <uri>http://www.mealldubh.org</uri> + </author> + <source> + <title type="html">Meall Dubh » OpenOffice.org</title> + <subtitle type="html">a view from a dark hill</subtitle> + <link rel="self" href="http://www.mealldubh.org/index.php/category/open-source/openofficeorg/feed"/> + <id>http://www.mealldubh.org/index.php/category/open-source/openofficeorg/feed</id> + <updated>2008-10-29T18:34:59+00:00</updated> + </source> + </entry> + + <entry xml:lang="en"> <title type="html">All Russian Schools to Use Free Software</title> <link href="http://www.solidoffice.com/archives/899"/> <id>http://www.solidoffice.com/?p=899</id> @@ -74,7 +97,7 @@ <subtitle type="html">A weblog by Charles-H. Schulz.</subtitle> <link rel="self" href="http://standardsandfreedom.net/index.php/category/ooo-postings/feed"/> <id>http://standardsandfreedom.net/index.php/category/ooo-postings/feed</id> - <updated>2008-10-29T18:00:16+00:00</updated> + <updated>2008-10-29T18:35:00+00:00</updated> </source> </entry> @@ -141,7 +164,7 @@ <subtitle type="html">a view from a dark hill</subtitle> <link rel="self" href="http://www.mealldubh.org/index.php/category/open-source/openofficeorg/feed"/> <id>http://www.mealldubh.org/index.php/category/open-source/openofficeorg/feed</id> - <updated>2008-10-29T00:00:16+00:00</updated> + <updated>2008-10-29T18:34:59+00:00</updated> </source> </entry> @@ -243,7 +266,7 @@ <title type="html">jpmcc's shared items in Google Reader</title> <link rel="self" href="http://www.google.co.uk/reader/public/atom/user/06203502505240591501/state/com.google/broadcast"/> <id>tag:google.com,2005:reader/user/06203502505240591501/state/com.google/broadcast</id> - <updated>2008-10-29T18:00:19+00:00</updated> + <updated>2008-10-29T18:35:02+00:00</updated> </source> </entry> @@ -356,7 +379,7 @@ <subtitle type="html">a view from a dark hill</subtitle> <link rel="self" href="http://www.mealldubh.org/index.php/category/open-source/openofficeorg/feed"/> <id>http://www.mealldubh.org/index.php/category/open-source/openofficeorg/feed</id> - <updated>2008-10-29T00:00:16+00:00</updated> + <updated>2008-10-29T18:34:59+00:00</updated> </source> </entry> @@ -457,7 +480,7 @@ <subtitle type="html">A weblog by Charles-H. Schulz.</subtitle> <link rel="self" href="http://standardsandfreedom.net/index.php/category/ooo-postings/feed"/> <id>http://standardsandfreedom.net/index.php/category/ooo-postings/feed</id> - <updated>2008-10-29T18:00:16+00:00</updated> + <updated>2008-10-29T18:35:00+00:00</updated> </source> </entry> @@ -513,7 +536,7 @@ <subtitle type="html">a view from a dark hill</subtitle> <link rel="self" href="http://www.mealldubh.org/index.php/category/open-source/openofficeorg/feed"/> <id>http://www.mealldubh.org/index.php/category/open-source/openofficeorg/feed</id> - <updated>2008-10-29T00:00:16+00:00</updated> + <updated>2008-10-29T18:34:59+00:00</updated> </source> </entry> @@ -537,7 +560,7 @@ <subtitle type="html">a view from a dark hill</subtitle> <link rel="self" href="http://www.mealldubh.org/index.php/category/open-source/openofficeorg/feed"/> <id>http://www.mealldubh.org/index.php/category/open-source/openofficeorg/feed</id> - <updated>2008-10-29T00:00:16+00:00</updated> + <updated>2008-10-29T18:34:59+00:00</updated> </source> </entry> @@ -557,7 +580,7 @@ <subtitle type="html">a view from a dark hill</subtitle> <link rel="self" href="http://www.mealldubh.org/index.php/category/open-source/openofficeorg/feed"/> <id>http://www.mealldubh.org/index.php/category/open-source/openofficeorg/feed</id> - <updated>2008-10-29T00:00:16+00:00</updated> + <updated>2008-10-29T18:34:59+00:00</updated> </source> </entry> @@ -586,25 +609,4 @@ </source> </entry> - <entry xml:lang="en"> - <title type="html">Two million today</title> - <link href="http://www.mealldubh.org/index.php/2008/10/17/two-million-today/"/> - <id>http://www.mealldubh.org/?p=584</id> - <updated>2008-10-17T06:48:25+00:00</updated> - <content type="html"><p>By the time you read this, there will have been over two million downloads of <a href="http://www.openoffice.org">OpenOffice.org</a> via the &#8216;bouncer&#8217; since we announced OpenOffice.org 3.0. The bouncer is the main (but not the only) mechanism for users to download the software, and it was largely inaccessible while the main <a href="http://download.openoffice.org">OpenOffice.org download page</a> was down.</p> -<p>The first three days&#8217; figures are below, and apologies to Mac users - I under-reported your downloads yesterday.<br /> -<a href="http://www.mealldubh.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/downloads1017.jpg"><img src="http://www.mealldubh.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/downloads1017.jpg" alt="Two million downloads" title="Two million" width="500" height="294" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-586" /></a></p></content> - <author> - <name>John McCreesh</name> - <uri>http://www.mealldubh.org</uri> - </author> - <source> - <title type="html">Meall Dubh » OpenOffice.org</title> - <subtitle type="html">a view from a dark hill</subtitle> - <link rel="self" href="http://www.mealldubh.org/index.php/category/open-source/openofficeorg/feed"/> - <id>http://www.mealldubh.org/index.php/category/open-source/openofficeorg/feed</id> - <updated>2008-10-29T00:00:16+00:00</updated> - </source> - </entry> - </feed> File [changed]: index.html Url: http://marketing.openoffice.org/source/browse/marketing/www/planet/index.html?r1=1.1098&r2=1.1099 Delta lines: +19 -17 --------------------- --- index.html 2008-10-29 18:00:40+0000 1.1098 +++ index.html 2008-10-29 18:35:31+0000 1.1099 @@ -34,10 +34,28 @@ <a href="rss20.xml"><img src="rss2.gif" alt="Link to RSS 2 feed" /></a> </div> -<p><em>Bloggings on marketing topics by project members - see <a href="#disclaimer">disclaimer</a>.<br />Last updated: October 29, 2008 06:00 PM GMT</em></p> +<p><em>Bloggings on marketing topics by project members - see <a href="#disclaimer">disclaimer</a>.<br />Last updated: October 29, 2008 06:35 PM GMT</em></p> <h2>October 29, 2008</h2> <h3> +<a href="http://www.mealldubh.org" title="Meall Dubh » OpenOffice.org"> +John McCreesh</a> : +<a href="http://www.mealldubh.org/index.php/2008/10/29/242-the-real-story/"> +2.4.2 - the real story</a> +</h3> +<p> +<p>There has been comment <a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=2085">in various blogs</a> about new security vulnerabilities in <a href="http://www.openoffice.org">OpenOffice.org</a>. Some of these posts and the comments on them are completely bizarre. So here’s the real story.</p> +<p>The OpenOffice.org security team were alerted to a couple of potential vulnerabilities in the code. I’ve blogged about this process many times before - there’s no suggestion that anyone has ever tried to exploit these vulnerabilities, or even that it is possible to do so. But we went ahead and fixed the code - as you do.</p> +<p>As <a href="http://www.openoffice.org/security/bulletin.html">the security bulletin</a> states, the recently released OpenOffice.org 3.0 isn’t affected. However, there are people out there who haven’t moved on to 3.0 - maybe they are using some add-on that isn’t yet available for 3.0; maybe they just don’t use version n.0 of anything on principle. Anyway, to cater for these users, we decided to do a new release 2.4.2 which fixes the vulnerabilities and has a pile of miscellaneous fixes in it for good measure.</p> +<p>We were all set to announce 2.4.2 this morning at the same time as announcing the vulnerabilities (that’s the recommended way of doing these things). Unfortunately the Bouncer service that we use to redirect downloads to local mirrors hasn’t picked up the new version, so people can’t actually download 2.4.2 from <a href="http://download.openoffice.org">our download page</a>.</p> +<p>So, please bear with us. As soon as the good people who run the Bouncer for us (and for several other open-source projects like Mozilla) have got it fixed, we’ll make the public announcement that 2.4.2 is available.</p></p> +<p> +<em><a href="http://www.mealldubh.org/index.php/2008/10/29/242-the-real-story/">by John at October 29, 2008 06:29 PM GMT</a></em> +</p> +<br /> +<hr /> +<br /> +<h3> <a href="http://www.solidoffice.com" title="SolidOffice » OpenOffice.org"> Benjamin Horst</a> : <a href="http://www.solidoffice.com/archives/899"> @@ -529,22 +547,6 @@ <br /> <hr /> <br /> -<h3> -<a href="http://www.mealldubh.org" title="Meall Dubh » OpenOffice.org"> -John McCreesh</a> : -<a href="http://www.mealldubh.org/index.php/2008/10/17/two-million-today/"> -Two million today</a> -</h3> -<p> -<p>By the time you read this, there will have been over two million downloads of <a href="http://www.openoffice.org">OpenOffice.org</a> via the ‘bouncer’ since we announced OpenOffice.org 3.0. The bouncer is the main (but not the only) mechanism for users to download the software, and it was largely inaccessible while the main <a href="http://download.openoffice.org">OpenOffice.org download page</a> was down.</p> -<p>The first three days’ figures are below, and apologies to Mac users - I under-reported your downloads yesterday.<br /> -<a href="http://www.mealldubh.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/downloads1017.jpg"><img src="http://www.mealldubh.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/downloads1017.jpg" alt="Two million downloads" title="Two million" width="500" height="294" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-586" /></a></p></p> -<p> -<em><a href="http://www.mealldubh.org/index.php/2008/10/17/two-million-today/">by John at October 17, 2008 06:48 AM GMT</a></em> -</p> -<br /> -<hr /> -<br /> <a id="disclaimer" name="disclaimer"></a> <p><em>Disclaimer: all views expressed on this page are those of the individual contributors, and may not reflect the views of the File [changed]: opml.xml Url: http://marketing.openoffice.org/source/browse/marketing/www/planet/opml.xml?r1=1.1098&r2=1.1099 Delta lines: +1 -1 ------------------- --- opml.xml 2008-10-29 18:00:40+0000 1.1098 +++ opml.xml 2008-10-29 18:35:31+0000 1.1099 @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ <opml version="1.1"> <head> <title>Marketing Planet</title> - <dateModified>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 18:00:32 +0000</dateModified> + <dateModified>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 18:35:24 +0000</dateModified> <ownerName>Marketing Project</ownerName> <ownerEmail>[EMAIL PROTECTED]</ownerEmail> </head> File [changed]: rss10.xml Url: http://marketing.openoffice.org/source/browse/marketing/www/planet/rss10.xml?r1=1.505&r2=1.506 Delta lines: +11 -9 -------------------- --- rss10.xml 2008-10-29 18:00:40+0000 1.505 +++ rss10.xml 2008-10-29 18:35:31+0000 1.506 @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ <items> <rdf:Seq> + <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mealldubh.org/?p=598" /> <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.solidoffice.com/?p=899" /> <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://standardsandfreedom.net/index.php/2008/10/29/links-for-the-end-of-october/" /> <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.solidoffice.com/?p=898" /> @@ -32,11 +33,20 @@ <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mealldubh.org/?p=589" /> <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mealldubh.org/?p=587" /> <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.solidoffice.com/?p=892" /> - <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mealldubh.org/?p=584" /> </rdf:Seq> </items> </channel> +<item rdf:about="http://www.mealldubh.org/?p=598"> + <title>John McCreesh: 2.4.2 - the real story</title> + <link>http://www.mealldubh.org/index.php/2008/10/29/242-the-real-story/</link> + <content:encoded><p>There has been comment <a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=2085">in various blogs</a> about new security vulnerabilities in <a href="http://www.openoffice.org">OpenOffice.org</a>. Some of these posts and the comments on them are completely bizarre. So here&#8217;s the real story.</p> +<p>The OpenOffice.org security team were alerted to a couple of potential vulnerabilities in the code. I&#8217;ve blogged about this process many times before - there&#8217;s no suggestion that anyone has ever tried to exploit these vulnerabilities, or even that it is possible to do so. But we went ahead and fixed the code - as you do.</p> +<p>As <a href="http://www.openoffice.org/security/bulletin.html">the security bulletin</a> states, the recently released OpenOffice.org 3.0 isn&#8217;t affected. However, there are people out there who haven&#8217;t moved on to 3.0 - maybe they are using some add-on that isn&#8217;t yet available for 3.0; maybe they just don&#8217;t use version n.0 of anything on principle. Anyway, to cater for these users, we decided to do a new release 2.4.2 which fixes the vulnerabilities and has a pile of miscellaneous fixes in it for good measure.</p> +<p>We were all set to announce 2.4.2 this morning at the same time as announcing the vulnerabilities (that&#8217;s the recommended way of doing these things). Unfortunately the Bouncer service that we use to redirect downloads to local mirrors hasn&#8217;t picked up the new version, so people can&#8217;t actually download 2.4.2 from <a href="http://download.openoffice.org">our download page</a>.</p> +<p>So, please bear with us. As soon as the good people who run the Bouncer for us (and for several other open-source projects like Mozilla) have got it fixed, we&#8217;ll make the public announcement that 2.4.2 is available.</p></content:encoded> + <dc:date>2008-10-29T18:29:50+00:00</dc:date> +</item> <item rdf:about="http://www.solidoffice.com/?p=899"> <title>Benjamin Horst: All Russian Schools to Use Free Software</title> <link>http://www.solidoffice.com/archives/899</link> @@ -370,13 +380,5 @@ <p>And <a href="http://www.lulu.com/browse/search.php?fTagsSelected=&fSort=&fSearchDataFamily=&fSearchDataQuery=openoffice.org&additionalFilter=0&fCatId_1=&fCatId_2=&fCatId_3=&fCatId_6=&fCatId_4=&fCatId_5=&fCatId_7=&fSearchData[title]=&fSearchData[author]=&reviewsFilter=fAny&fSearchData[lang_code]=EN&fSearchData[country_id]=&publishDate=fDateAny&fSubmitSearch.x=0&fSubmitSearch.y=0">many more</a>.</p></content:encoded> <dc:date>2008-10-17T20:42:34+00:00</dc:date> </item> -<item rdf:about="http://www.mealldubh.org/?p=584"> - <title>John McCreesh: Two million today</title> - <link>http://www.mealldubh.org/index.php/2008/10/17/two-million-today/</link> - <content:encoded><p>By the time you read this, there will have been over two million downloads of <a href="http://www.openoffice.org">OpenOffice.org</a> via the &#8216;bouncer&#8217; since we announced OpenOffice.org 3.0. The bouncer is the main (but not the only) mechanism for users to download the software, and it was largely inaccessible while the main <a href="http://download.openoffice.org">OpenOffice.org download page</a> was down.</p> -<p>The first three days&#8217; figures are below, and apologies to Mac users - I under-reported your downloads yesterday.<br /> -<a href="http://www.mealldubh.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/downloads1017.jpg"><img src="http://www.mealldubh.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/downloads1017.jpg" alt="Two million downloads" title="Two million" width="500" height="294" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-586" /></a></p></content:encoded> - <dc:date>2008-10-17T06:48:25+00:00</dc:date> -</item> </rdf:RDF> File [changed]: rss20.xml Url: http://marketing.openoffice.org/source/browse/marketing/www/planet/rss20.xml?r1=1.505&r2=1.506 Delta lines: +11 -9 -------------------- --- rss20.xml 2008-10-29 18:00:40+0000 1.505 +++ rss20.xml 2008-10-29 18:35:32+0000 1.506 @@ -8,6 +8,17 @@ <description>Marketing Planet - http://marketing.openoffice.org/planet/</description> <item> + <title>John McCreesh: 2.4.2 - the real story</title> + <guid>http://www.mealldubh.org/?p=598</guid> + <link>http://www.mealldubh.org/index.php/2008/10/29/242-the-real-story/</link> + <description><p>There has been comment <a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=2085">in various blogs</a> about new security vulnerabilities in <a href="http://www.openoffice.org">OpenOffice.org</a>. Some of these posts and the comments on them are completely bizarre. So here&#8217;s the real story.</p> +<p>The OpenOffice.org security team were alerted to a couple of potential vulnerabilities in the code. I&#8217;ve blogged about this process many times before - there&#8217;s no suggestion that anyone has ever tried to exploit these vulnerabilities, or even that it is possible to do so. But we went ahead and fixed the code - as you do.</p> +<p>As <a href="http://www.openoffice.org/security/bulletin.html">the security bulletin</a> states, the recently released OpenOffice.org 3.0 isn&#8217;t affected. However, there are people out there who haven&#8217;t moved on to 3.0 - maybe they are using some add-on that isn&#8217;t yet available for 3.0; maybe they just don&#8217;t use version n.0 of anything on principle. Anyway, to cater for these users, we decided to do a new release 2.4.2 which fixes the vulnerabilities and has a pile of miscellaneous fixes in it for good measure.</p> +<p>We were all set to announce 2.4.2 this morning at the same time as announcing the vulnerabilities (that&#8217;s the recommended way of doing these things). Unfortunately the Bouncer service that we use to redirect downloads to local mirrors hasn&#8217;t picked up the new version, so people can&#8217;t actually download 2.4.2 from <a href="http://download.openoffice.org">our download page</a>.</p> +<p>So, please bear with us. As soon as the good people who run the Bouncer for us (and for several other open-source projects like Mozilla) have got it fixed, we&#8217;ll make the public announcement that 2.4.2 is available.</p></description> + <pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 18:29:50 +0000</pubDate> +</item> +<item> <title>Benjamin Horst: All Russian Schools to Use Free Software</title> <guid>http://www.solidoffice.com/?p=899</guid> <link>http://www.solidoffice.com/archives/899</link> @@ -358,15 +369,6 @@ <p>And <a href="http://www.lulu.com/browse/search.php?fTagsSelected=&fSort=&fSearchDataFamily=&fSearchDataQuery=openoffice.org&additionalFilter=0&fCatId_1=&fCatId_2=&fCatId_3=&fCatId_6=&fCatId_4=&fCatId_5=&fCatId_7=&fSearchData[title]=&fSearchData[author]=&reviewsFilter=fAny&fSearchData[lang_code]=EN&fSearchData[country_id]=&publishDate=fDateAny&fSubmitSearch.x=0&fSubmitSearch.y=0">many more</a>.</p></description> <pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 20:42:34 +0000</pubDate> </item> -<item> - <title>John McCreesh: Two million today</title> - <guid>http://www.mealldubh.org/?p=584</guid> - <link>http://www.mealldubh.org/index.php/2008/10/17/two-million-today/</link> - <description><p>By the time you read this, there will have been over two million downloads of <a href="http://www.openoffice.org">OpenOffice.org</a> via the &#8216;bouncer&#8217; since we announced OpenOffice.org 3.0. The bouncer is the main (but not the only) mechanism for users to download the software, and it was largely inaccessible while the main <a href="http://download.openoffice.org">OpenOffice.org download page</a> was down.</p> -<p>The first three days&#8217; figures are below, and apologies to Mac users - I under-reported your downloads yesterday.<br /> -<a href="http://www.mealldubh.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/downloads1017.jpg"><img src="http://www.mealldubh.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/downloads1017.jpg" alt="Two million downloads" title="Two million" width="500" height="294" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-586" /></a></p></description> - <pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 06:48:25 +0000</pubDate> -</item> </channel> </rss> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
