User: jpmcc Date: 2008-12-13 23:59:47+0000 Modified: marketing/www/planet/atom.xml marketing/www/planet/index.html marketing/www/planet/opml.xml marketing/www/planet/rss10.xml marketing/www/planet/rss20.xml
Log: Planet run at Sun Dec 14 00:00:13 GMT 2008 File Changes: Directory: /marketing/www/planet/ ================================= File [changed]: atom.xml Url: http://marketing.openoffice.org/source/browse/marketing/www/planet/atom.xml?r1=1.1269&r2=1.1270 Delta lines: +33 -28 --------------------- --- atom.xml 2008-12-13 17:59:39+0000 1.1269 +++ atom.xml 2008-12-13 23:59:44+0000 1.1270 @@ -5,10 +5,36 @@ <link rel="self" href="http://marketing.openoffice.org/planet/atom.xml"/> <link href="http://marketing.openoffice.org/planet/"/> <id>http://marketing.openoffice.org/planet/atom.xml</id> - <updated>2008-12-13T18:00:27+00:00</updated> + <updated>2008-12-14T00:00:31+00:00</updated> <generator uri="http://www.planetplanet.org/";>Planet/2.0 +http://www.planetplanet.org</generator> <entry xml:lang="en"> + <title type="html">Open or commercial - you decide</title> + <link href="http://www.mealldubh.org/index.php/2008/12/13/open-or-commercial-you-decide/"/> + <id>http://www.mealldubh.org/?p=613</id> + <updated>2008-12-13T21:53:53+00:00</updated> + <content type="html"><p>Let&#8217;s face it, you&#8217;d think it would be hard for a volunteer open-source project to compete with one of the world&#8217;s most affluent technology companies.</p> +<p>No, for once, I&#8217;m not talking about <a href="http://www.openoffice.org/">OpenOffice.org</a> and a rival product from a monopoly commercial software house.</p> +<p>I&#8217;m talking about <a href="http://www.openstreetmap.org/">OpenStreetMap</a> and <a href="http://maps.google.co.uk/">Google Maps</a>. I was looking at a property search engine this evening and I spotted that as well as their regular Google-based maps, they also have an experimental OpenStreetMap based version. So which is better? You choose:</p> +<ul> +<li><a href="http://www.nestoria.co.uk/staveley_kendal/property/buy">Google Maps sample</a></li> +<li><a href="http://openstreetmap.nestoria.co.uk/staveley_kendal/property/buy">OpenStreetMap sample</a></li> +</ul> +<p>Kudos to the guys at <a href="http://www.nestoria.co.uk/">Nestoria</a> for their use of open source technologies.</p></content> + <author> + <name>John McCreesh</name> + <uri>http://www.mealldubh.org</uri> + </author> + <source> + <title type="html">Meall Dubh » OpenOffice.org</title> + <subtitle type="html">a view from a dark hill</subtitle> + <link rel="self" href="http://www.mealldubh.org/index.php/category/open-source/openofficeorg/feed"/> + <id>http://www.mealldubh.org/index.php/category/open-source/openofficeorg/feed</id> + <updated>2008-12-14T00:00:14+00:00</updated> + </source> + </entry> + + <entry xml:lang="en"> <title type="html">Protect Innovation: Donât use Proprietary Software (and other Advent niceties)</title> <link href="http://standardsandfreedom.net/index.php/2008/12/11/protect-innovation-dont-use-proprietary-software-and-other-advent-niceties/"/> <id>http://standardsandfreedom.net/index.php/2008/12/11/protect-innovation-dont-use-proprietary-software-and-other-advent-niceties/</id> @@ -31,7 +57,7 @@ <subtitle type="html">A weblog by Charles-H. Schulz.</subtitle> <link rel="self" href="http://standardsandfreedom.net/index.php/category/ooo-postings/feed"/> <id>http://standardsandfreedom.net/index.php/category/ooo-postings/feed</id> - <updated>2008-12-13T06:00:15+00:00</updated> + <updated>2008-12-14T00:00:15+00:00</updated> </source> </entry> @@ -59,7 +85,7 @@ <title type="html">jpmcc's shared items in Google Reader</title> <link rel="self" href="http://www.google.co.uk/reader/public/atom/user/06203502505240591501/state/com.google/broadcast"/> <id>tag:google.com,2005:reader/user/06203502505240591501/state/com.google/broadcast</id> - <updated>2008-12-13T18:00:18+00:00</updated> + <updated>2008-12-14T00:00:18+00:00</updated> </source> </entry> @@ -178,7 +204,7 @@ <title type="html">jpmcc's shared items in Google Reader</title> <link rel="self" href="http://www.google.co.uk/reader/public/atom/user/06203502505240591501/state/com.google/broadcast"/> <id>tag:google.com,2005:reader/user/06203502505240591501/state/com.google/broadcast</id> - <updated>2008-12-13T18:00:18+00:00</updated> + <updated>2008-12-14T00:00:18+00:00</updated> </source> </entry> @@ -220,7 +246,7 @@ <title type="html">jpmcc's shared items in Google Reader</title> <link rel="self" href="http://www.google.co.uk/reader/public/atom/user/06203502505240591501/state/com.google/broadcast"/> <id>tag:google.com,2005:reader/user/06203502505240591501/state/com.google/broadcast</id> - <updated>2008-12-13T18:00:18+00:00</updated> + <updated>2008-12-14T00:00:18+00:00</updated> </source> </entry> @@ -240,7 +266,7 @@ <subtitle type="html">News and interesting stories about OpenOffice.org and other open source solutions.</subtitle> <link rel="self" href="http://ooomarketing.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default"/> <id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4887643299605448632</id> - <updated>2008-12-12T06:00:24+00:00</updated> + <updated>2008-12-14T00:00:28+00:00</updated> </source> </entry> @@ -428,7 +454,7 @@ <subtitle type="html">The Magic of Open Source</subtitle> <link rel="self" href="http://www.theopensourcerer.com/tag/openofficeorg/feed/"/> <id>http://www.theopensourcerer.com/tag/openofficeorg/feed/</id> - <updated>2008-12-11T12:00:31+00:00</updated> + <updated>2008-12-14T00:00:31+00:00</updated> </source> </entry> @@ -473,25 +499,4 @@ </source> </entry> - <entry xml:lang="en"> - <title type="html">â¦and a pretty face too</title> - <link href="http://www.mealldubh.org/index.php/2008/11/29/and-a-pretty-face-too/"/> - <id>http://www.mealldubh.org/?p=610</id> - <updated>2008-11-29T11:56:04+00:00</updated> - <content type="html"><p><a href="http://ux.openoffice.org"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-611" title="ux" src="http://www.mealldubh.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/ux.png" alt="UX Project" width="200" height="142" /></a>Over the past twenty years, <a href="http://www.openoffice.org/product/">OpenOffice.org</a> has developed into the leading open-source office productivity suite - easily the equal of commercial offerings. Unlike say Microsoft Office, it was designed from day one as a single unit (MS-Office was bolted together from completely separate products - Excel, Word, etc). This makes it consistent as you move from <a href="http://www.openoffice.org/product/calc.html">Calc</a> to <a href="http://www.openoffice.org/product/writer.html">Writer</a> to <a href="http://www.openoffice.org/product/impress.html">Impress</a> etc - and so easier to learn and use.</p> -<p>However, there is a general feeling among users that there must be a better way of presenting office tools to users. <a href="http://en.redoffice.com.cn/">RedFlag</a> have completely reworked the look and feel of OpenOffice for their office software for the Chinese market - <a href="http://en.redoffice.com.cn/redoffice/index.php?class=bg">RedOffice</a>. IBM have had a go too with their<a href="http://symphony.lotus.com/software/lotus/symphony/home.nsf/home"> Lotus Symphony</a>. Even Microsoft had a go at this in a more limited way with their much-maligned Ribbon interface.</p> -<p>Now it&#8217;s time for the Community OpenOffice.org to have a go. The <a href="http://ux.openoffice.org/">User Experience Project</a> launched the Renaissance concept at a <a href="http://marketing.openoffice.org/ooocon2008/programme/thursday_1413.pdf">presentation at the recent OpenOffice.org Conference</a>, and in a <a href="http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS/entry/project_renaissance_kick_off1">blog posting on GullFOSS</a>. Keep an eye on <a href="http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Renaissance">their wiki</a> - this activity may make a dramatic difference to the way millions of people do their daily word processing, spreadsheets, presentations, etc!</p></content> - <author> - <name>John McCreesh</name> - <uri>http://www.mealldubh.org</uri> - </author> - <source> - <title type="html">Meall Dubh » OpenOffice.org</title> - <subtitle type="html">a view from a dark hill</subtitle> - <link rel="self" href="http://www.mealldubh.org/index.php/category/open-source/openofficeorg/feed"/> - <id>http://www.mealldubh.org/index.php/category/open-source/openofficeorg/feed</id> - <updated>2008-12-09T18:00:16+00:00</updated> - </source> - </entry> - </feed> File [changed]: index.html Url: http://marketing.openoffice.org/source/browse/marketing/www/planet/index.html?r1=1.1276&r2=1.1277 Delta lines: +23 -18 --------------------- --- index.html 2008-12-13 17:59:40+0000 1.1276 +++ index.html 2008-12-13 23:59:44+0000 1.1277 @@ -37,8 +37,30 @@ <a href="rss20.xml"><img src="rss2.gif" alt="Link to RSS 2 feed" /></a> </div> -<p><em>Bloggings on marketing topics by project members - see <a href="#disclaimer">disclaimer</a>.<br />Last updated: December 13, 2008 06:00 PM GMT</em></p> +<p><em>Bloggings on marketing topics by project members - see <a href="#disclaimer">disclaimer</a>.<br />Last updated: December 14, 2008 12:00 AM GMT</em></p> +<h2>December 13, 2008</h2> +<h3> +<a href="http://www.mealldubh.org"; title="Meall Dubh » OpenOffice.org"> +John McCreesh</a> : +<a href="http://www.mealldubh.org/index.php/2008/12/13/open-or-commercial-you-decide/";> +Open or commercial - you decide</a> +</h3> +<p> +<p>Let’s face it, you’d think it would be hard for a volunteer open-source project to compete with one of the world’s most affluent technology companies.</p> +<p>No, for once, I’m not talking about <a href="http://www.openoffice.org/";>OpenOffice.org</a> and a rival product from a monopoly commercial software house.</p> +<p>I’m talking about <a href="http://www.openstreetmap.org/";>OpenStreetMap</a> and <a href="http://maps.google.co.uk/";>Google Maps</a>. I was looking at a property search engine this evening and I spotted that as well as their regular Google-based maps, they also have an experimental OpenStreetMap based version. So which is better? You choose:</p> +<ul> +<li><a href="http://www.nestoria.co.uk/staveley_kendal/property/buy";>Google Maps sample</a></li> +<li><a href="http://openstreetmap.nestoria.co.uk/staveley_kendal/property/buy";>OpenStreetMap sample</a></li> +</ul> +<p>Kudos to the guys at <a href="http://www.nestoria.co.uk/";>Nestoria</a> for their use of open source technologies.</p></p> +<p> +<em><a href="http://www.mealldubh.org/index.php/2008/12/13/open-or-commercial-you-decide/";>by John at December 13, 2008 09:53 PM GMT</a></em> +</p> +<br /> +<hr /> +<br /> <h2>December 11, 2008</h2> <h3> <a href="http://standardsandfreedom.net"; title="Moved by Freedom - Powered by Standards » OOo Postings"> @@ -405,23 +427,6 @@ <br /> <hr /> <br /> -<h2>November 29, 2008</h2> -<h3> -<a href="http://www.mealldubh.org"; title="Meall Dubh » OpenOffice.org"> -John McCreesh</a> : -<a href="http://www.mealldubh.org/index.php/2008/11/29/and-a-pretty-face-too/";> -â¦and a pretty face too</a> -</h3> -<p> -<p><a href="http://ux.openoffice.org";><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-611" title="ux" src="http://www.mealldubh.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/ux.png"; alt="UX Project" width="200" height="142" /></a>Over the past twenty years, <a href="http://www.openoffice.org/product/";>OpenOffice.org</a> has developed into the leading open-source office productivity suite - easily the equal of commercial offerings. Unlike say Microsoft Office, it was designed from day one as a single unit (MS-Office was bolted together from completely separate products - Excel, Word, etc). This makes it consistent as you move from <a href="http://www.openoffice.org/product/calc.html";>Calc</a> to <a href="http://www.openoffice.org/product/writer.html";>Writer</a> to <a href="http://www.openoffice.org/product/impress.html";>Impress</a> etc - and so easier to learn and use.</p> -<p>However, there is a general feeling among users that there must be a better way of presenting office tools to users. <a href="http://en.redoffice.com.cn/";>RedFlag</a> have completely reworked the look and feel of OpenOffice for their office software for the Chinese market - <a href="http://en.redoffice.com.cn/redoffice/index.php?class=bg";>RedOffice</a>. IBM have had a go too with their<a href="http://symphony.lotus.com/software/lotus/symphony/home.nsf/home";> Lotus Symphony</a>. Even Microsoft had a go at this in a more limited way with their much-maligned Ribbon interface.</p> -<p>Now it’s time for the Community OpenOffice.org to have a go. The <a href="http://ux.openoffice.org/";>User Experience Project</a> launched the Renaissance concept at a <a href="http://marketing.openoffice.org/ooocon2008/programme/thursday_1413.pdf";>presentation at the recent OpenOffice.org Conference</a>, and in a <a href="http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS/entry/project_renaissance_kick_off1";>blog posting on GullFOSS</a>. Keep an eye on <a href="http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Renaissance";>their wiki</a> - this activity may make a dramatic difference to the way millions of people do their daily word processing, spreadsheets, presentations, etc!</p></p> -<p> -<em><a href="http://www.mealldubh.org/index.php/2008/11/29/and-a-pretty-face-too/";>by John at November 29, 2008 11:56 AM GMT</a></em> -</p> -<br /> -<hr /> -<br /> <a id="disclaimer" name="disclaimer"></a> <p><em>Disclaimer: all views expressed on this page are those of the individual contributors, and may not reflect the views of the File [changed]: opml.xml Url: http://marketing.openoffice.org/source/browse/marketing/www/planet/opml.xml?r1=1.1269&r2=1.1270 Delta lines: +1 -1 ------------------- --- opml.xml 2008-12-13 17:59:40+0000 1.1269 +++ opml.xml 2008-12-13 23:59:44+0000 1.1270 @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ <opml version="1.1"> <head> <title>Marketing Planet</title> - <dateModified>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 18:00:27 +0000</dateModified> + <dateModified>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 00:00:31 +0000</dateModified> <ownerName>Marketing Project</ownerName> <ownerEmail>[email protected]</ownerEmail> </head> File [changed]: rss10.xml Url: http://marketing.openoffice.org/source/browse/marketing/www/planet/rss10.xml?r1=1.572&r2=1.573 Delta lines: +14 -9 -------------------- --- rss10.xml 2008-12-12 11:59:37+0000 1.572 +++ rss10.xml 2008-12-13 23:59:44+0000 1.573 @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ <items> <rdf:Seq> + <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mealldubh.org/?p=613"; /> <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://standardsandfreedom.net/index.php/2008/12/11/protect-innovation-dont-use-proprietary-software-and-other-advent-niceties/"; /> <rdf:li rdf:resource="tag:google.com,2005:reader/item/3bf70cd3d5faaef2" /> <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.solidoffice.com/?p=922"; /> @@ -32,11 +33,23 @@ <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.theopensourcerer.com/?p=561"; /> <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.solidoffice.com/?p=917"; /> <rdf:li rdf:resource="tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5198340507565233169.post-8159324126494009918" /> - <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mealldubh.org/?p=610"; /> </rdf:Seq> </items> </channel> +<item rdf:about="http://www.mealldubh.org/?p=613";> + <title>John McCreesh: Open or commercial - you decide</title> + <link>http://www.mealldubh.org/index.php/2008/12/13/open-or-commercial-you-decide/</link> + <content:encoded><p>Let&#8217;s face it, you&#8217;d think it would be hard for a volunteer open-source project to compete with one of the world&#8217;s most affluent technology companies.</p> +<p>No, for once, I&#8217;m not talking about <a href="http://www.openoffice.org/">OpenOffice.org</a> and a rival product from a monopoly commercial software house.</p> +<p>I&#8217;m talking about <a href="http://www.openstreetmap.org/">OpenStreetMap</a> and <a href="http://maps.google.co.uk/">Google Maps</a>. I was looking at a property search engine this evening and I spotted that as well as their regular Google-based maps, they also have an experimental OpenStreetMap based version. So which is better? You choose:</p> +<ul> +<li><a href="http://www.nestoria.co.uk/staveley_kendal/property/buy">Google Maps sample</a></li> +<li><a href="http://openstreetmap.nestoria.co.uk/staveley_kendal/property/buy">OpenStreetMap sample</a></li> +</ul> +<p>Kudos to the guys at <a href="http://www.nestoria.co.uk/">Nestoria</a> for their use of open source technologies.</p></content:encoded> + <dc:date>2008-12-13T21:53:53+00:00</dc:date> +</item> <item rdf:about="http://standardsandfreedom.net/index.php/2008/12/11/protect-innovation-dont-use-proprietary-software-and-other-advent-niceties/";> <title>Charles Schulz: Protect Innovation: Donât use Proprietary Software (and other Advent niceties)</title> <link>http://standardsandfreedom.net/index.php/2008/12/11/protect-innovation-dont-use-proprietary-software-and-other-advent-niceties/</link> @@ -253,13 +266,5 @@ <dc:date>2008-11-30T21:31:04+00:00</dc:date> <dc:creator>Leif Lodahl</dc:creator> </item> -<item rdf:about="http://www.mealldubh.org/?p=610";> - <title>John McCreesh: â¦and a pretty face too</title> - <link>http://www.mealldubh.org/index.php/2008/11/29/and-a-pretty-face-too/</link> - <content:encoded><p><a href="http://ux.openoffice.org"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-611" title="ux" src="http://www.mealldubh.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/ux.png" alt="UX Project" width="200" height="142" /></a>Over the past twenty years, <a href="http://www.openoffice.org/product/">OpenOffice.org</a> has developed into the leading open-source office productivity suite - easily the equal of commercial offerings. Unlike say Microsoft Office, it was designed from day one as a single unit (MS-Office was bolted together from completely separate products - Excel, Word, etc). This makes it consistent as you move from <a href="http://www.openoffice.org/product/calc.html">Calc</a> to <a href="http://www.openoffice.org/product/writer.html">Writer</a> to <a href="http://www.openoffice.org/product/impress.html">Impress</a> etc - and so easier to learn and use.</p> -<p>However, there is a general feeling among users that there must be a better way of presenting office tools to users. <a href="http://en.redoffice.com.cn/">RedFlag</a> have completely reworked the look and feel of OpenOffice for their office software for the Chinese market - <a href="http://en.redoffice.com.cn/redoffice/index.php?class=bg">RedOffice</a>. IBM have had a go too with their<a href="http://symphony.lotus.com/software/lotus/symphony/home.nsf/home"> Lotus Symphony</a>. Even Microsoft had a go at this in a more limited way with their much-maligned Ribbon interface.</p> -<p>Now it&#8217;s time for the Community OpenOffice.org to have a go. The <a href="http://ux.openoffice.org/">User Experience Project</a> launched the Renaissance concept at a <a href="http://marketing.openoffice.org/ooocon2008/programme/thursday_1413.pdf">presentation at the recent OpenOffice.org Conference</a>, and in a <a href="http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS/entry/project_renaissance_kick_off1">blog posting on GullFOSS</a>. Keep an eye on <a href="http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Renaissance">their wiki</a> - this activity may make a dramatic difference to the way millions of people do their daily word processing, spreadsheets, presentations, etc!</p></content:encoded> - <dc:date>2008-11-29T11:56:04+00:00</dc:date> -</item> </rdf:RDF> File [changed]: rss20.xml Url: http://marketing.openoffice.org/source/browse/marketing/www/planet/rss20.xml?r1=1.572&r2=1.573 Delta lines: +14 -9 -------------------- --- rss20.xml 2008-12-12 11:59:38+0000 1.572 +++ rss20.xml 2008-12-13 23:59:44+0000 1.573 @@ -8,6 +8,20 @@ <description>Marketing Planet - http://marketing.openoffice.org/planet/</description> <item> + <title>John McCreesh: Open or commercial - you decide</title> + <guid>http://www.mealldubh.org/?p=613</guid> + <link>http://www.mealldubh.org/index.php/2008/12/13/open-or-commercial-you-decide/</link> + <description><p>Let&#8217;s face it, you&#8217;d think it would be hard for a volunteer open-source project to compete with one of the world&#8217;s most affluent technology companies.</p> +<p>No, for once, I&#8217;m not talking about <a href="http://www.openoffice.org/">OpenOffice.org</a> and a rival product from a monopoly commercial software house.</p> +<p>I&#8217;m talking about <a href="http://www.openstreetmap.org/">OpenStreetMap</a> and <a href="http://maps.google.co.uk/">Google Maps</a>. I was looking at a property search engine this evening and I spotted that as well as their regular Google-based maps, they also have an experimental OpenStreetMap based version. So which is better? You choose:</p> +<ul> +<li><a href="http://www.nestoria.co.uk/staveley_kendal/property/buy">Google Maps sample</a></li> +<li><a href="http://openstreetmap.nestoria.co.uk/staveley_kendal/property/buy">OpenStreetMap sample</a></li> +</ul> +<p>Kudos to the guys at <a href="http://www.nestoria.co.uk/">Nestoria</a> for their use of open source technologies.</p></description> + <pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 21:53:53 +0000</pubDate> +</item> +<item> <title>Charles Schulz: Protect Innovation: Donât use Proprietary Software (and other Advent niceties)</title> <guid>http://standardsandfreedom.net/index.php/2008/12/11/protect-innovation-dont-use-proprietary-software-and-other-advent-niceties/</guid> <link>http://standardsandfreedom.net/index.php/2008/12/11/protect-innovation-dont-use-proprietary-software-and-other-advent-niceties/</link> @@ -239,15 +253,6 @@ <pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 21:31:04 +0000</pubDate> <author>[email protected] (Leif Lodahl)</author> </item> -<item> - <title>John McCreesh: â¦and a pretty face too</title> - <guid>http://www.mealldubh.org/?p=610</guid> - <link>http://www.mealldubh.org/index.php/2008/11/29/and-a-pretty-face-too/</link> - <description><p><a href="http://ux.openoffice.org"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-611" title="ux" src="http://www.mealldubh.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/ux.png" alt="UX Project" width="200" height="142" /></a>Over the past twenty years, <a href="http://www.openoffice.org/product/">OpenOffice.org</a> has developed into the leading open-source office productivity suite - easily the equal of commercial offerings. Unlike say Microsoft Office, it was designed from day one as a single unit (MS-Office was bolted together from completely separate products - Excel, Word, etc). This makes it consistent as you move from <a href="http://www.openoffice.org/product/calc.html">Calc</a> to <a href="http://www.openoffice.org/product/writer.html">Writer</a> to <a href="http://www.openoffice.org/product/impress.html">Impress</a> etc - and so easier to learn and use.</p> -<p>However, there is a general feeling among users that there must be a better way of presenting office tools to users. <a href="http://en.redoffice.com.cn/">RedFlag</a> have completely reworked the look and feel of OpenOffice for their office software for the Chinese market - <a href="http://en.redoffice.com.cn/redoffice/index.php?class=bg">RedOffice</a>. IBM have had a go too with their<a href="http://symphony.lotus.com/software/lotus/symphony/home.nsf/home"> Lotus Symphony</a>. Even Microsoft had a go at this in a more limited way with their much-maligned Ribbon interface.</p> -<p>Now it&#8217;s time for the Community OpenOffice.org to have a go. The <a href="http://ux.openoffice.org/">User Experience Project</a> launched the Renaissance concept at a <a href="http://marketing.openoffice.org/ooocon2008/programme/thursday_1413.pdf">presentation at the recent OpenOffice.org Conference</a>, and in a <a href="http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS/entry/project_renaissance_kick_off1">blog posting on GullFOSS</a>. Keep an eye on <a href="http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Renaissance">their wiki</a> - this activity may make a dramatic difference to the way millions of people do their daily word processing, spreadsheets, presentations, etc!</p></description> - <pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 11:56:04 +0000</pubDate> -</item> </channel> </rss> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
![http://www.mealldubh.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/ux.png"](http://www.mealldubh.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/ux.png"){kind=link}
![http://www.mealldubh.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/ux.png"](http://www.mealldubh.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/ux.png"){kind=link}