User: jpmcc Date: 2009-01-08 23:59:21+0000 Modified: marketing/www/planet/atom.xml marketing/www/planet/index.html marketing/www/planet/opml.xml marketing/www/planet/rss10.xml marketing/www/planet/rss20.xml
Log: Planet run at Fri Jan 9 00:00:19 GMT 2009 File Changes: Directory: /marketing/www/planet/ ================================= File [changed]: atom.xml Url: http://marketing.openoffice.org/source/browse/marketing/www/planet/atom.xml?r1=1.1371&r2=1.1372 Delta lines: +55 -52 --------------------- --- atom.xml 2009-01-08 17:59:00+0000 1.1371 +++ atom.xml 2009-01-08 23:59:17+0000 1.1372 @@ -5,9 +5,34 @@ <link rel="self" href="http://marketing.openoffice.org/planet/atom.xml"/> <link href="http://marketing.openoffice.org/planet/"/> <id>http://marketing.openoffice.org/planet/atom.xml</id> - <updated>2009-01-08T18:00:27+00:00</updated> + <updated>2009-01-09T00:00:42+00:00</updated> <generator uri="http://www.planetplanet.org/";>Planet/2.0 +http://www.planetplanet.org</generator> + <entry> + <title type="html">24 hour QA chat at 13th of January 2009</title> + <link href="http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS/entry/24_hour_qa_chat_at"/> + <id>tag:google.com,2005:reader/item/9efaf54f67ebed1b</id> + <updated>2009-01-08T16:03:15+00:00</updated> + <content type="html"><div> + <h1>Welcome in the QA project of OpenOffice.org</h1> + <p>If you are interested in working in the QA project you can participate in the next 24 hour QA chat at 13 <sup>th</sup> of January 2009. This is monthly chat with experts from the QA community where everybody can work on issues in <a href="http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/query.cgi">IssueTracker</a> (bug tracking system for OOo) with the help of these experts. The meetings have special topics, which will announced on a <a href="http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Issue_hunting_party">wiki page</a>. The chat will take place at IRC ( <a href="javascript:void(0);">irc://irc.freenode.net/</a>) in the group #qa.openoffice.org and will start at 10:00 am UTC.</p> + <h1>What's up in the next QA chat?</h1> + <p>Next Tuesday the 13th of January the QA community will have their first Issue-Clean-Up-Chat in 2009. Stefan Baltzer <a href="http://qa.openoffice.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=dev&msgNo=11547">announced</a> that meeting on the QA mailing list in December. One of the topics at that chat will be to verify and to close all fixed issues in OOo 3.0.1. When there are changes in the topics or if you need additional information, please take a look at the relevant Wiki page :</p> + <p> <a href="http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Issue_hunting_party#Issue_hunting_party_13th_of_January_2009">http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Issue_hunting_party#Issue_hunting_party_13th_of_January_2009</a> </p> + <p>See you in the Chat!</p><br /> + </div></content> + <author> + <name>Thorsten Ziehm</name> + <uri></uri> + </author> + <source> + <title type="html">jpmcc's shared items in Google Reader</title> + <link rel="self" href="http://www.google.co.uk/reader/public/atom/user/06203502505240591501/state/com.google/broadcast"/> + <id>tag:google.com,2005:reader/user/06203502505240591501/state/com.google/broadcast</id> + <updated>2009-01-09T00:00:29+00:00</updated> + </source> + </entry> + <entry xml:lang="en"> <title type="html">Vietnam: Will be 100% Open Source</title> <link href="http://www.theopensourcerer.com/2009/01/08/vietnam-will-be-100-open-source/"/> @@ -217,6 +242,33 @@ </source> </entry> + <entry> + <title type="html">New: OpenOffice.org 3.0.1 Release Candidate 1 (build OOO300_m14) available</title> + <link href="http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS/entry/new_openoffice_org_3_08"/> + <id>tag:google.com,2005:reader/item/e030ca87d13ad327</id> + <updated>2008-12-23T13:13:29+00:00</updated> + <content type="html"><p>We had the plan to publish <b>OpenOffice.org 3.0.1 Release Candidate 1 </b>before Christmas and actually we reached this goal. <b>OOo 3.0.1 RC 1 </b>(build <b>OOO300_m14)</b> has +been uploaded to the mirror network. So we hope that you will find a nice place for it under your tree.<br /><br />If +you find severe issues within this build please file them to +OpenOffice.org's bug tracking system IssueTracker. If you think the +issue is a show stopper then please notify the releases mailing list.<br /> <br />Please use the following link:<br /><a title="Download page" href="http://download.openoffice.org/3.0.1rc1/index.html">http://download.openoffice.org/3.0.1rc1/index.html</a></p> + <p>When the Bouncer links don't work, please select one of the <b>extended</b> mirrors at the following page ( <b>listed with an [E]</b> ) and download the bits from the &quot;.../extended/developer/OOO300_m14&quot; directory:<br /><a title="Choose an alternative download location" href="http://distribution.openoffice.org/mirrors/#mirrors">http://distribution.openoffice.org/mirrors/#mirrors</a></p> + <p>Or you can use the following website:<br /><a title="Download page without Javascript" href="http://download.openoffice.org/3.0.1rc1/index-nojs.html">http://download.openoffice.org/3.0.1rc1/index-nojs.html</a></p> + <p>MD5 checksums:<br /><a title="Page containing MD5 checksums" href="http://download.openoffice.org/3.0.1rc1/md5sums.html">http://download.openoffice.org/3.0.1rc1/md5sums.html</a></p> + <p>Thanks a lot to everyone who has made this possible.</p> + <p>Merry X-Mas and a Happy New Year for you and your loved ones. :-)<br /></p></content> + <author> + <name>Marcus Lange</name> + <uri></uri> + </author> + <source> + <title type="html">jpmcc's shared items in Google Reader</title> + <link rel="self" href="http://www.google.co.uk/reader/public/atom/user/06203502505240591501/state/com.google/broadcast"/> + <id>tag:google.com,2005:reader/user/06203502505240591501/state/com.google/broadcast</id> + <updated>2009-01-09T00:00:29+00:00</updated> + </source> + </entry> + <entry xml:lang="en"> <title type="html">The importance of friends</title> <link href="http://www.mealldubh.org/index.php/2008/12/21/the-importance-of-friends/"/> @@ -285,7 +337,7 @@ <title type="html">jpmcc's shared items in Google Reader</title> <link rel="self" href="http://www.google.co.uk/reader/public/atom/user/06203502505240591501/state/com.google/broadcast"/> <id>tag:google.com,2005:reader/user/06203502505240591501/state/com.google/broadcast</id> - <updated>2009-01-08T18:00:16+00:00</updated> + <updated>2009-01-09T00:00:29+00:00</updated> </source> </entry> @@ -389,7 +441,7 @@ <subtitle type="html">News and interesting stories about OpenOffice.org and other open source solutions.</subtitle> <link rel="self" href="http://ooomarketing.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default"/> <id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4887643299605448632</id> - <updated>2009-01-08T12:00:24+00:00</updated> + <updated>2009-01-09T00:00:40+00:00</updated> </source> </entry> @@ -513,53 +565,4 @@ </source> </entry> - <entry xml:lang="en"> - <title type="html">Information Week Compares Open Source Office Suites</title> - <link href="http://www.solidoffice.com/archives/925"/> - <id>http://www.solidoffice.com/?p=925</id> - <updated>2008-12-15T23:01:30+00:00</updated> - <content type="html"><p>It feels like <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/">InformationWeek</a> is writing more and more about open source lately, perhaps because the open source tide is rising ever higher. Last week, IW&#8217;s Serdar Yegulalp published <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/news/software/enterpriseapps/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=212201932&pgno=1&queryText=&isPrev="><em>Open-Source Office Suites Compared</em></a>, which reviews <a href="http://www.openoffice.org/">OpenOffice.org</a>, <a href="http://www.sun.com/software/staroffice/">StarOffice</a>, <a href="http://symphony.lotus.com/">IBM Lotus Symphony</a>, <a href="http://www.koffice.org/">KOffice</a> and <a href="http://www.abisource.com/">AbiWord</a>:</p> -<blockquote><p><span id="articleBody">&#8220;In this review I&#8217;ve taken a look at OpenOffice.org&#8217;s most recent release, along with the commercially-supported StarOffice from Sun, IBM&#8217;s reworking of OO.o as Lotus Symphony, the KOffice suite for Linux, and the minimal but still useful AbiWord. Talking about how these would entirely replace Microsoft Office would be misleading, since not everyone might be doing that &#8212; so I&#8217;ve looked at each product as far on its own merits as possible.&#8221;</span></p></blockquote> -<p>Each suite has its unique strengths, and Yegulalp does a thorough job comparing their primary advantages and the factors that differentiate them.</p> -<p>Overall, the presence of these five major office suites as competitors, and cooperators that all support the open ODF file format, helps to encourage robust experimentation and innovation which the market has sorely lacked for well over a decade.</p> -<p>&#8220;Compatible competition&#8221; will bring better value and technology to all of us using these types of software tools.</p></content> - <author> - <name>Benjamin Horst</name> - <uri>http://www.solidoffice.com</uri> - </author> - <source> - <title type="html">SolidOffice » OpenOffice.org</title> - <subtitle type="html">Home of The Tiny Guide to OpenOffice.org</subtitle> - <link rel="self" href="http://www.solidoffice.com/archives/category/openofficeorg/feed"/> - <id>http://www.solidoffice.com/archives/category/openofficeorg/feed</id> - <updated>2009-01-08T00:00:19+00:00</updated> - </source> - </entry> - - <entry xml:lang="en"> - <title type="html">Open or commercial - you decide</title> - <link href="http://www.mealldubh.org/index.php/2008/12/13/open-or-commercial-you-decide/"/> - <id>http://www.mealldubh.org/?p=613</id> - <updated>2008-12-13T21:53:53+00:00</updated> - <content type="html"><p>Let&#8217;s face it, you&#8217;d think it would be hard for a volunteer open-source project to compete with one of the world&#8217;s most affluent technology companies.</p> -<p>No, for once, I&#8217;m not talking about <a href="http://www.openoffice.org/">OpenOffice.org</a> and a rival product from a monopoly commercial software house.</p> -<p>I&#8217;m talking about <a href="http://www.openstreetmap.org/">OpenStreetMap</a> and <a href="http://maps.google.co.uk/">Google Maps</a>. I was looking at a property search engine this evening and I spotted that as well as their regular Google-based maps, they also have an experimental OpenStreetMap based version. So which is better? You choose:</p> -<ul> -<li><a href="http://www.nestoria.co.uk/staveley_kendal/property/buy">Google Maps sample</a></li> -<li><a href="http://openstreetmap.nestoria.co.uk/staveley_kendal/property/buy">OpenStreetMap sample</a></li> -</ul> -<p>Kudos to the guys at <a href="http://www.nestoria.co.uk/">Nestoria</a> for their use of open source technologies.</p></content> - <author> - <name>John McCreesh</name> - <uri>http://www.mealldubh.org</uri> - </author> - <source> - <title type="html">Meall Dubh » OpenOffice.org</title> - <subtitle type="html">a view from a dark hill</subtitle> - <link rel="self" href="http://www.mealldubh.org/index.php/category/open-source/openofficeorg/feed"/> - <id>http://www.mealldubh.org/index.php/category/open-source/openofficeorg/feed</id> - <updated>2009-01-08T00:00:15+00:00</updated> - </source> - </entry> - </feed> File [changed]: index.html Url: http://marketing.openoffice.org/source/browse/marketing/www/planet/index.html?r1=1.1378&r2=1.1379 Delta lines: +46 -42 --------------------- --- index.html 2009-01-08 17:59:01+0000 1.1378 +++ index.html 2009-01-08 23:59:18+0000 1.1379 @@ -37,10 +37,31 @@ <a href="rss20.xml"><img src="rss2.gif" alt="Link to RSS 2 feed" /></a> </div> -<p><em>Bloggings on marketing topics by project members - see <a href="#disclaimer">disclaimer</a>.<br />Last updated: January 08, 2009 06:00 PM GMT</em></p> +<p><em>Bloggings on marketing topics by project members - see <a href="#disclaimer">disclaimer</a>.<br />Last updated: January 09, 2009 12:00 AM GMT</em></p> <h2>January 08, 2009</h2> <h3> +<a href="" title="jpmcc's shared items in Google Reader"> +GullFOSS</a> : +<a href="http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS/entry/24_hour_qa_chat_at";> +24 hour QA chat at 13th of January 2009</a> +</h3> +<p> +<div> + <h1>Welcome in the QA project of OpenOffice.org</h1> + <p>If you are interested in working in the QA project you can participate in the next 24 hour QA chat at 13 <sup>th</sup> of January 2009. This is monthly chat with experts from the QA community where everybody can work on issues in <a href="http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/query.cgi";>IssueTracker</a> (bug tracking system for OOo) with the help of these experts. The meetings have special topics, which will announced on a <a href="http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Issue_hunting_party";>wiki page</a>. The chat will take place at IRC ( <a href="javascript:void(0);">irc://irc.freenode.net/</a>) in the group #qa.openoffice.org and will start at 10:00 am UTC.</p> + <h1>What's up in the next QA chat?</h1> + <p>Next Tuesday the 13th of January the QA community will have their first Issue-Clean-Up-Chat in 2009. Stefan Baltzer <a href="http://qa.openoffice.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=dev&msgNo=11547";>announced</a> that meeting on the QA mailing list in December. One of the topics at that chat will be to verify and to close all fixed issues in OOo 3.0.1. When there are changes in the topics or if you need additional information, please take a look at the relevant Wiki page :</p> + <p> <a href="http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Issue_hunting_party#Issue_hunting_party_13th_of_January_2009";>http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Issue_hunting_party#Issue_hunting_party_13th_of_January_2009</a> </p> + <p>See you in the Chat!</p><br /> + </div></p> +<p> +<em><a href="http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS/entry/24_hour_qa_chat_at";>by Thorsten Ziehm at January 08, 2009 04:03 PM GMT</a></em> +</p> +<br /> +<hr /> +<br /> +<h3> <a href="http://www.theopensourcerer.com"; title="The Open Sourcerer » OpenOffice.org"> Alan Lord</a> : <a href="http://www.theopensourcerer.com/2009/01/08/vietnam-will-be-100-open-source/";> @@ -220,6 +241,30 @@ <br /> <hr /> <br /> +<h2>December 23, 2008</h2> +<h3> +<a href="" title="jpmcc's shared items in Google Reader"> +GullFOSS</a> : +<a href="http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS/entry/new_openoffice_org_3_08";> +New: OpenOffice.org 3.0.1 Release Candidate 1 (build OOO300_m14) available</a> +</h3> +<p> +<p>We had the plan to publish <b>OpenOffice.org 3.0.1 Release Candidate 1 </b>before Christmas and actually we reached this goal. <b>OOo 3.0.1 RC 1 </b>(build <b>OOO300_m14)</b> has +been uploaded to the mirror network. So we hope that you will find a nice place for it under your tree.<br /><br />If +you find severe issues within this build please file them to +OpenOffice.org's bug tracking system IssueTracker. If you think the +issue is a show stopper then please notify the releases mailing list.<br /> <br />Please use the following link:<br /><a title="Download page" href="http://download.openoffice.org/3.0.1rc1/index.html";>http://download.openoffice.org/3.0.1rc1/index.html</a></p> + <p>When the Bouncer links don't work, please select one of the <b>extended</b> mirrors at the following page ( <b>listed with an [E]</b> ) and download the bits from the ".../extended/developer/OOO300_m14" directory:<br /><a title="Choose an alternative download location" href="http://distribution.openoffice.org/mirrors/#mirrors";>http://distribution.openoffice.org/mirrors/#mirrors</a></p> + <p>Or you can use the following website:<br /><a title="Download page without Javascript" href="http://download.openoffice.org/3.0.1rc1/index-nojs.html";>http://download.openoffice.org/3.0.1rc1/index-nojs.html</a></p> + <p>MD5 checksums:<br /><a title="Page containing MD5 checksums" href="http://download.openoffice.org/3.0.1rc1/md5sums.html";>http://download.openoffice.org/3.0.1rc1/md5sums.html</a></p> + <p>Thanks a lot to everyone who has made this possible.</p> + <p>Merry X-Mas and a Happy New Year for you and your loved ones. :-)<br /></p></p> +<p> +<em><a href="http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS/entry/new_openoffice_org_3_08";>by Marcus Lange at December 23, 2008 01:13 PM GMT</a></em> +</p> +<br /> +<hr /> +<br /> <h2>December 21, 2008</h2> <h3> <a href="http://www.mealldubh.org"; title="Meall Dubh » OpenOffice.org"> @@ -462,47 +507,6 @@ <br /> <hr /> <br /> -<h2>December 15, 2008</h2> -<h3> -<a href="http://www.solidoffice.com"; title="SolidOffice » OpenOffice.org"> -Benjamin Horst</a> : -<a href="http://www.solidoffice.com/archives/925";> -Information Week Compares Open Source Office Suites</a> -</h3> -<p> -<p>It feels like <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/";>InformationWeek</a> is writing more and more about open source lately, perhaps because the open source tide is rising ever higher. Last week, IW’s Serdar Yegulalp published <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/news/software/enterpriseapps/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=212201932&pgno=1&queryText=&isPrev=";><em>Open-Source Office Suites Compared</em></a>, which reviews <a href="http://www.openoffice.org/";>OpenOffice.org</a>, <a href="http://www.sun.com/software/staroffice/";>StarOffice</a>, <a href="http://symphony.lotus.com/";>IBM Lotus Symphony</a>, <a href="http://www.koffice.org/";>KOffice</a> and <a href="http://www.abisource.com/";>AbiWord</a>:</p> -<blockquote><p><span id="articleBody">“In this review I’ve taken a look at OpenOffice.org’s most recent release, along with the commercially-supported StarOffice from Sun, IBM’s reworking of OO.o as Lotus Symphony, the KOffice suite for Linux, and the minimal but still useful AbiWord. Talking about how these would entirely replace Microsoft Office would be misleading, since not everyone might be doing that — so I’ve looked at each product as far on its own merits as possible.”</span></p></blockquote> -<p>Each suite has its unique strengths, and Yegulalp does a thorough job comparing their primary advantages and the factors that differentiate them.</p> -<p>Overall, the presence of these five major office suites as competitors, and cooperators that all support the open ODF file format, helps to encourage robust experimentation and innovation which the market has sorely lacked for well over a decade.</p> -<p>“Compatible competition” will bring better value and technology to all of us using these types of software tools.</p></p> -<p> -<em><a href="http://www.solidoffice.com/archives/925";>by Benjamin Horst at December 15, 2008 11:01 PM GMT</a></em> -</p> -<br /> -<hr /> -<br /> -<h2>December 13, 2008</h2> -<h3> -<a href="http://www.mealldubh.org"; title="Meall Dubh » OpenOffice.org"> -John McCreesh</a> : -<a href="http://www.mealldubh.org/index.php/2008/12/13/open-or-commercial-you-decide/";> -Open or commercial - you decide</a> -</h3> -<p> -<p>Let’s face it, you’d think it would be hard for a volunteer open-source project to compete with one of the world’s most affluent technology companies.</p> -<p>No, for once, I’m not talking about <a href="http://www.openoffice.org/";>OpenOffice.org</a> and a rival product from a monopoly commercial software house.</p> -<p>I’m talking about <a href="http://www.openstreetmap.org/";>OpenStreetMap</a> and <a href="http://maps.google.co.uk/";>Google Maps</a>. I was looking at a property search engine this evening and I spotted that as well as their regular Google-based maps, they also have an experimental OpenStreetMap based version. So which is better? You choose:</p> -<ul> -<li><a href="http://www.nestoria.co.uk/staveley_kendal/property/buy";>Google Maps sample</a></li> -<li><a href="http://openstreetmap.nestoria.co.uk/staveley_kendal/property/buy";>OpenStreetMap sample</a></li> -</ul> -<p>Kudos to the guys at <a href="http://www.nestoria.co.uk/";>Nestoria</a> for their use of open source technologies.</p></p> -<p> -<em><a href="http://www.mealldubh.org/index.php/2008/12/13/open-or-commercial-you-decide/";>by John at December 13, 2008 09:53 PM GMT</a></em> -</p> -<br /> -<hr /> -<br /> <a id="disclaimer" name="disclaimer"></a> <p><em>Disclaimer: all views expressed on this page are those of the individual contributors, and may not reflect the views of the File [changed]: opml.xml Url: http://marketing.openoffice.org/source/browse/marketing/www/planet/opml.xml?r1=1.1371&r2=1.1372 Delta lines: +1 -1 ------------------- --- opml.xml 2009-01-08 17:59:01+0000 1.1371 +++ opml.xml 2009-01-08 23:59:18+0000 1.1372 @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ <opml version="1.1"> <head> <title>Marketing Planet</title> - <dateModified>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 18:00:27 +0000</dateModified> + <dateModified>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 00:00:43 +0000</dateModified> <ownerName>Marketing Project</ownerName> <ownerEmail>[email protected]</ownerEmail> </head> File [changed]: rss10.xml Url: http://marketing.openoffice.org/source/browse/marketing/www/planet/rss10.xml?r1=1.590&r2=1.591 Delta lines: +32 -25 --------------------- --- rss10.xml 2009-01-08 11:59:00+0000 1.590 +++ rss10.xml 2009-01-08 23:59:18+0000 1.591 @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ <items> <rdf:Seq> + <rdf:li rdf:resource="tag:google.com,2005:reader/item/9efaf54f67ebed1b" /> <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.theopensourcerer.com/?p=618"; /> <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://standardsandfreedom.net/index.php/2009/01/07/doubts-hopes/"; /> <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://standardsandfreedom.net/index.php/2009/01/07/predictions-resolutions/"; /> @@ -20,6 +21,7 @@ <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.solidoffice.com/?p=949"; /> <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.solidoffice.com/?p=943"; /> <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mealldubh.org/?p=622"; /> + <rdf:li rdf:resource="tag:google.com,2005:reader/item/e030ca87d13ad327" /> <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mealldubh.org/?p=614"; /> <rdf:li rdf:resource="tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5198340507565233169.post-641065946779307480" /> <rdf:li rdf:resource="tag:google.com,2005:reader/item/26d3f6f3be1f0b08" /> @@ -31,12 +33,24 @@ <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.solidoffice.com/?p=930"; /> <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.solidoffice.com/?p=926"; /> <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.theopensourcerer.com/?p=589"; /> - <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.solidoffice.com/?p=925"; /> - <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mealldubh.org/?p=613"; /> </rdf:Seq> </items> </channel> +<item rdf:about="tag:google.com,2005:reader/item/9efaf54f67ebed1b"> + <title>GullFOSS: 24 hour QA chat at 13th of January 2009</title> + <link>http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS/entry/24_hour_qa_chat_at</link> + <content:encoded><div> + <h1>Welcome in the QA project of OpenOffice.org</h1> + <p>If you are interested in working in the QA project you can participate in the next 24 hour QA chat at 13 <sup>th</sup> of January 2009. This is monthly chat with experts from the QA community where everybody can work on issues in <a href="http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/query.cgi">IssueTracker</a> (bug tracking system for OOo) with the help of these experts. The meetings have special topics, which will announced on a <a href="http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Issue_hunting_party">wiki page</a>. The chat will take place at IRC ( <a href="javascript:void(0);">irc://irc.freenode.net/</a>) in the group #qa.openoffice.org and will start at 10:00 am UTC.</p> + <h1>What's up in the next QA chat?</h1> + <p>Next Tuesday the 13th of January the QA community will have their first Issue-Clean-Up-Chat in 2009. Stefan Baltzer <a href="http://qa.openoffice.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=dev&msgNo=11547">announced</a> that meeting on the QA mailing list in December. One of the topics at that chat will be to verify and to close all fixed issues in OOo 3.0.1. When there are changes in the topics or if you need additional information, please take a look at the relevant Wiki page :</p> + <p> <a href="http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Issue_hunting_party#Issue_hunting_party_13th_of_January_2009">http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Issue_hunting_party#Issue_hunting_party_13th_of_January_2009</a> </p> + <p>See you in the Chat!</p><br /> + </div></content:encoded> + <dc:date>2009-01-08T16:03:15+00:00</dc:date> + <dc:creator>Thorsten Ziehm</dc:creator> +</item> <item rdf:about="http://www.theopensourcerer.com/?p=618";> <title>Alan Lord: Vietnam: Will be 100% Open Source</title> <link>http://www.theopensourcerer.com/2009/01/08/vietnam-will-be-100-open-source/</link> @@ -155,6 +169,22 @@ <p>May I wish them every success with their Christmas present, and on their behalf, thank all those around the world who have made <a href="http://why.openoffice.org/">OpenOffice.org</a> what it is today - the world&#8217;s leading open-source office productivity suite.</p></content:encoded> <dc:date>2008-12-25T10:35:19+00:00</dc:date> </item> +<item rdf:about="tag:google.com,2005:reader/item/e030ca87d13ad327"> + <title>GullFOSS: New: OpenOffice.org 3.0.1 Release Candidate 1 (build OOO300_m14) available</title> + <link>http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS/entry/new_openoffice_org_3_08</link> + <content:encoded><p>We had the plan to publish <b>OpenOffice.org 3.0.1 Release Candidate 1 </b>before Christmas and actually we reached this goal. <b>OOo 3.0.1 RC 1 </b>(build <b>OOO300_m14)</b> has +been uploaded to the mirror network. So we hope that you will find a nice place for it under your tree.<br /><br />If +you find severe issues within this build please file them to +OpenOffice.org's bug tracking system IssueTracker. If you think the +issue is a show stopper then please notify the releases mailing list.<br /> <br />Please use the following link:<br /><a title="Download page" href="http://download.openoffice.org/3.0.1rc1/index.html">http://download.openoffice.org/3.0.1rc1/index.html</a></p> + <p>When the Bouncer links don't work, please select one of the <b>extended</b> mirrors at the following page ( <b>listed with an [E]</b> ) and download the bits from the &quot;.../extended/developer/OOO300_m14&quot; directory:<br /><a title="Choose an alternative download location" href="http://distribution.openoffice.org/mirrors/#mirrors">http://distribution.openoffice.org/mirrors/#mirrors</a></p> + <p>Or you can use the following website:<br /><a title="Download page without Javascript" href="http://download.openoffice.org/3.0.1rc1/index-nojs.html">http://download.openoffice.org/3.0.1rc1/index-nojs.html</a></p> + <p>MD5 checksums:<br /><a title="Page containing MD5 checksums" href="http://download.openoffice.org/3.0.1rc1/md5sums.html">http://download.openoffice.org/3.0.1rc1/md5sums.html</a></p> + <p>Thanks a lot to everyone who has made this possible.</p> + <p>Merry X-Mas and a Happy New Year for you and your loved ones. :-)<br /></p></content:encoded> + <dc:date>2008-12-23T13:13:29+00:00</dc:date> + <dc:creator>Marcus Lange</dc:creator> +</item> <item rdf:about="http://www.mealldubh.org/?p=614";> <title>John McCreesh: The importance of friends</title> <link>http://www.mealldubh.org/index.php/2008/12/21/the-importance-of-friends/</link> @@ -308,28 +338,5 @@ <!-- Social Bookmarking Reloaded END --></content:encoded> <dc:date>2008-12-16T09:20:35+00:00</dc:date> </item> -<item rdf:about="http://www.solidoffice.com/?p=925";> - <title>Benjamin Horst: Information Week Compares Open Source Office Suites</title> - <link>http://www.solidoffice.com/archives/925</link> - <content:encoded><p>It feels like <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/">InformationWeek</a> is writing more and more about open source lately, perhaps because the open source tide is rising ever higher. Last week, IW&#8217;s Serdar Yegulalp published <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/news/software/enterpriseapps/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=212201932&pgno=1&queryText=&isPrev="><em>Open-Source Office Suites Compared</em></a>, which reviews <a href="http://www.openoffice.org/">OpenOffice.org</a>, <a href="http://www.sun.com/software/staroffice/">StarOffice</a>, <a href="http://symphony.lotus.com/">IBM Lotus Symphony</a>, <a href="http://www.koffice.org/">KOffice</a> and <a href="http://www.abisource.com/">AbiWord</a>:</p> -<blockquote><p><span id="articleBody">&#8220;In this review I&#8217;ve taken a look at OpenOffice.org&#8217;s most recent release, along with the commercially-supported StarOffice from Sun, IBM&#8217;s reworking of OO.o as Lotus Symphony, the KOffice suite for Linux, and the minimal but still useful AbiWord. Talking about how these would entirely replace Microsoft Office would be misleading, since not everyone might be doing that &#8212; so I&#8217;ve looked at each product as far on its own merits as possible.&#8221;</span></p></blockquote> -<p>Each suite has its unique strengths, and Yegulalp does a thorough job comparing their primary advantages and the factors that differentiate them.</p> -<p>Overall, the presence of these five major office suites as competitors, and cooperators that all support the open ODF file format, helps to encourage robust experimentation and innovation which the market has sorely lacked for well over a decade.</p> -<p>&#8220;Compatible competition&#8221; will bring better value and technology to all of us using these types of software tools.</p></content:encoded> - <dc:date>2008-12-15T23:01:30+00:00</dc:date> -</item> -<item rdf:about="http://www.mealldubh.org/?p=613";> - <title>John McCreesh: Open or commercial - you decide</title> - <link>http://www.mealldubh.org/index.php/2008/12/13/open-or-commercial-you-decide/</link> - <content:encoded><p>Let&#8217;s face it, you&#8217;d think it would be hard for a volunteer open-source project to compete with one of the world&#8217;s most affluent technology companies.</p> -<p>No, for once, I&#8217;m not talking about <a href="http://www.openoffice.org/">OpenOffice.org</a> and a rival product from a monopoly commercial software house.</p> -<p>I&#8217;m talking about <a href="http://www.openstreetmap.org/">OpenStreetMap</a> and <a href="http://maps.google.co.uk/">Google Maps</a>. I was looking at a property search engine this evening and I spotted that as well as their regular Google-based maps, they also have an experimental OpenStreetMap based version. So which is better? You choose:</p> -<ul> -<li><a href="http://www.nestoria.co.uk/staveley_kendal/property/buy">Google Maps sample</a></li> -<li><a href="http://openstreetmap.nestoria.co.uk/staveley_kendal/property/buy">OpenStreetMap sample</a></li> -</ul> -<p>Kudos to the guys at <a href="http://www.nestoria.co.uk/">Nestoria</a> for their use of open source technologies.</p></content:encoded> - <dc:date>2008-12-13T21:53:53+00:00</dc:date> -</item> </rdf:RDF> File [changed]: rss20.xml Url: http://marketing.openoffice.org/source/browse/marketing/www/planet/rss20.xml?r1=1.590&r2=1.591 Delta lines: +30 -25 --------------------- --- rss20.xml 2009-01-08 11:59:00+0000 1.590 +++ rss20.xml 2009-01-08 23:59:18+0000 1.591 @@ -8,6 +8,20 @@ <description>Marketing Planet - http://marketing.openoffice.org/planet/</description> <item> + <title>GullFOSS: 24 hour QA chat at 13th of January 2009</title> + <guid>tag:google.com,2005:reader/item/9efaf54f67ebed1b</guid> + <link>http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS/entry/24_hour_qa_chat_at</link> + <description><div> + <h1>Welcome in the QA project of OpenOffice.org</h1> + <p>If you are interested in working in the QA project you can participate in the next 24 hour QA chat at 13 <sup>th</sup> of January 2009. This is monthly chat with experts from the QA community where everybody can work on issues in <a href="http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/query.cgi">IssueTracker</a> (bug tracking system for OOo) with the help of these experts. The meetings have special topics, which will announced on a <a href="http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Issue_hunting_party">wiki page</a>. The chat will take place at IRC ( <a href="javascript:void(0);">irc://irc.freenode.net/</a>) in the group #qa.openoffice.org and will start at 10:00 am UTC.</p> + <h1>What's up in the next QA chat?</h1> + <p>Next Tuesday the 13th of January the QA community will have their first Issue-Clean-Up-Chat in 2009. Stefan Baltzer <a href="http://qa.openoffice.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=dev&msgNo=11547">announced</a> that meeting on the QA mailing list in December. One of the topics at that chat will be to verify and to close all fixed issues in OOo 3.0.1. When there are changes in the topics or if you need additional information, please take a look at the relevant Wiki page :</p> + <p> <a href="http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Issue_hunting_party#Issue_hunting_party_13th_of_January_2009">http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Issue_hunting_party#Issue_hunting_party_13th_of_January_2009</a> </p> + <p>See you in the Chat!</p><br /> + </div></description> + <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 16:03:15 +0000</pubDate> +</item> +<item> <title>Alan Lord: Vietnam: Will be 100% Open Source</title> <guid>http://www.theopensourcerer.com/?p=618</guid> <link>http://www.theopensourcerer.com/2009/01/08/vietnam-will-be-100-open-source/</link> @@ -133,6 +147,22 @@ <pubDate>Thu, 25 Dec 2008 10:35:19 +0000</pubDate> </item> <item> + <title>GullFOSS: New: OpenOffice.org 3.0.1 Release Candidate 1 (build OOO300_m14) available</title> + <guid>tag:google.com,2005:reader/item/e030ca87d13ad327</guid> + <link>http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS/entry/new_openoffice_org_3_08</link> + <description><p>We had the plan to publish <b>OpenOffice.org 3.0.1 Release Candidate 1 </b>before Christmas and actually we reached this goal. <b>OOo 3.0.1 RC 1 </b>(build <b>OOO300_m14)</b> has +been uploaded to the mirror network. So we hope that you will find a nice place for it under your tree.<br /><br />If +you find severe issues within this build please file them to +OpenOffice.org's bug tracking system IssueTracker. If you think the +issue is a show stopper then please notify the releases mailing list.<br /> <br />Please use the following link:<br /><a title="Download page" href="http://download.openoffice.org/3.0.1rc1/index.html">http://download.openoffice.org/3.0.1rc1/index.html</a></p> + <p>When the Bouncer links don't work, please select one of the <b>extended</b> mirrors at the following page ( <b>listed with an [E]</b> ) and download the bits from the &quot;.../extended/developer/OOO300_m14&quot; directory:<br /><a title="Choose an alternative download location" href="http://distribution.openoffice.org/mirrors/#mirrors">http://distribution.openoffice.org/mirrors/#mirrors</a></p> + <p>Or you can use the following website:<br /><a title="Download page without Javascript" href="http://download.openoffice.org/3.0.1rc1/index-nojs.html">http://download.openoffice.org/3.0.1rc1/index-nojs.html</a></p> + <p>MD5 checksums:<br /><a title="Page containing MD5 checksums" href="http://download.openoffice.org/3.0.1rc1/md5sums.html">http://download.openoffice.org/3.0.1rc1/md5sums.html</a></p> + <p>Thanks a lot to everyone who has made this possible.</p> + <p>Merry X-Mas and a Happy New Year for you and your loved ones. :-)<br /></p></description> + <pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 13:13:29 +0000</pubDate> +</item> +<item> <title>John McCreesh: The importance of friends</title> <guid>http://www.mealldubh.org/?p=614</guid> <link>http://www.mealldubh.org/index.php/2008/12/21/the-importance-of-friends/</link> @@ -295,31 +325,6 @@ <!-- Social Bookmarking Reloaded END --></description> <pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 09:20:35 +0000</pubDate> </item> -<item> - <title>Benjamin Horst: Information Week Compares Open Source Office Suites</title> - <guid>http://www.solidoffice.com/?p=925</guid> - <link>http://www.solidoffice.com/archives/925</link> - <description><p>It feels like <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/">InformationWeek</a> is writing more and more about open source lately, perhaps because the open source tide is rising ever higher. Last week, IW&#8217;s Serdar Yegulalp published <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/news/software/enterpriseapps/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=212201932&pgno=1&queryText=&isPrev="><em>Open-Source Office Suites Compared</em></a>, which reviews <a href="http://www.openoffice.org/">OpenOffice.org</a>, <a href="http://www.sun.com/software/staroffice/">StarOffice</a>, <a href="http://symphony.lotus.com/">IBM Lotus Symphony</a>, <a href="http://www.koffice.org/">KOffice</a> and <a href="http://www.abisource.com/">AbiWord</a>:</p> -<blockquote><p><span id="articleBody">&#8220;In this review I&#8217;ve taken a look at OpenOffice.org&#8217;s most recent release, along with the commercially-supported StarOffice from Sun, IBM&#8217;s reworking of OO.o as Lotus Symphony, the KOffice suite for Linux, and the minimal but still useful AbiWord. Talking about how these would entirely replace Microsoft Office would be misleading, since not everyone might be doing that &#8212; so I&#8217;ve looked at each product as far on its own merits as possible.&#8221;</span></p></blockquote> -<p>Each suite has its unique strengths, and Yegulalp does a thorough job comparing their primary advantages and the factors that differentiate them.</p> -<p>Overall, the presence of these five major office suites as competitors, and cooperators that all support the open ODF file format, helps to encourage robust experimentation and innovation which the market has sorely lacked for well over a decade.</p> -<p>&#8220;Compatible competition&#8221; will bring better value and technology to all of us using these types of software tools.</p></description> - <pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 23:01:30 +0000</pubDate> -</item> -<item> - <title>John McCreesh: Open or commercial - you decide</title> - <guid>http://www.mealldubh.org/?p=613</guid> - <link>http://www.mealldubh.org/index.php/2008/12/13/open-or-commercial-you-decide/</link> - <description><p>Let&#8217;s face it, you&#8217;d think it would be hard for a volunteer open-source project to compete with one of the world&#8217;s most affluent technology companies.</p> -<p>No, for once, I&#8217;m not talking about <a href="http://www.openoffice.org/">OpenOffice.org</a> and a rival product from a monopoly commercial software house.</p> -<p>I&#8217;m talking about <a href="http://www.openstreetmap.org/">OpenStreetMap</a> and <a href="http://maps.google.co.uk/">Google Maps</a>. I was looking at a property search engine this evening and I spotted that as well as their regular Google-based maps, they also have an experimental OpenStreetMap based version. So which is better? You choose:</p> -<ul> -<li><a href="http://www.nestoria.co.uk/staveley_kendal/property/buy">Google Maps sample</a></li> -<li><a href="http://openstreetmap.nestoria.co.uk/staveley_kendal/property/buy">OpenStreetMap sample</a></li> -</ul> -<p>Kudos to the guys at <a href="http://www.nestoria.co.uk/">Nestoria</a> for their use of open source technologies.</p></description> - <pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 21:53:53 +0000</pubDate> -</item> </channel> </rss> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
