User: jpmcc Date: 2009-03-03 18:01:23+0000 Modified: marketing/www/planet/atom.xml marketing/www/planet/index.html marketing/www/planet/opml.xml marketing/www/planet/rss10.xml marketing/www/planet/rss20.xml
Log: Planet run at Tue Mar 3 18:00:15 GMT 2009 File Changes: Directory: /marketing/www/planet/ ================================= File [changed]: atom.xml Url: http://marketing.openoffice.org/source/browse/marketing/www/planet/atom.xml?r1=1.1580&r2=1.1581 Delta lines: +73 -75 --------------------- --- atom.xml 2009-03-03 12:01:00+0000 1.1580 +++ atom.xml 2009-03-03 18:01:19+0000 1.1581 @@ -5,10 +5,72 @@ <link rel="self" href="http://marketing.openoffice.org/planet/atom.xml"/> <link href="http://marketing.openoffice.org/planet/"/> <id>http://marketing.openoffice.org/planet/atom.xml</id> - <updated>2009-03-03T12:00:21+00:00</updated> + <updated>2009-03-03T18:00:40+00:00</updated> <generator uri="http://www.planetplanet.org/";>Planet/2.0 +http://www.planetplanet.org</generator> <entry> + <title type="html">Translating OpenOffice.org extensions</title> + <link href="http://lodahl.blogspot.com/2009/03/translating-openofficeorg-extensions.html"/> + <id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5198340507565233169.post-7888011759649598452</id> + <updated>2009-03-03T14:44:04+00:00</updated> + <content type="html">One very important feature in OpenOffice.org is the ability to extend the functionality of the program with extensions. Most public extensions can be found in the official extension repository here: http://extensions.services.openoffice.org/.It is very important for the community, that as many extensions as possible are localized or translated into as many languages as possible. There is a tool</content> + <author> + <name>Leif Lodahl</name> + <email>[email protected]</email> + <uri>http://lodahl.blogspot.com/search/label/OpenOffice.org</uri> + </author> + <source> + <title type="html">Lodahl's blog</title> + <subtitle type="html">OpenOffice.org, open source software and open standards. These are the three things you can read about on my blog. I'll try to keep you updated on news and events in Denmark. +Okay, sometimes you can read about Lotus Notes too</subtitle> + <link rel="self" href="http://lodahl.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default/-/OpenOffice.org"/> + <id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5198340507565233169</id> + <updated>2009-03-03T18:00:37+00:00</updated> + </source> + </entry> + + <entry xml:lang="en"> + <title type="html">Thirty years old and still no Tom-Tomâ¦</title> + <link href="http://standardsandfreedom.net/index.php/2009/03/03/thirty-years-old-and-still-no-tom-tom/"/> + <id>http://standardsandfreedom.net/index.php/2009/03/03/thirty-years-old-and-still-no-tom-tom/</id> + <updated>2009-03-03T13:35:56+00:00</updated> + <content type="html"><p><a href="http://www.laquadrature.net/HADOPI" title="HADOPI - Le Net en France : black-out"><img src="http://media.laquadrature.net/Quadrature_black-out_HADOPI_728x90px.gif" border="0" alt="HADOPI - Le Net en France : black-out" /></a></p> +<p>Today I am thirty. And today, I have decided I would post a blog that would not be different from the my other posts. How&#8217;s that for genuine originality? So today&#8217;s topic will be a round-up of news on OpenDocument Format (ODF). It has been a long time I haven&#8217;t updated this area.</p> +<p>&nbsp;</p> +<ul> +<li> +<p>ODF 1.2 is well underway. The arrival of a flurry of new members inside the ODF Technical Committee who have illustrated themselves as proponents of OOXML is a bit fun to watch I must say. But I have to command the general serenity of the Committee and its chairs, Rob Weir and Michael Brauer for their quiet and effective management of the proceedings. I think the only thing that is to be hoped for is that we can finish the completion of this ODF sub-version. Also, and of some interest, I can only recommend <a href="http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office/">the reading of the archives of the Committee&#8217;s discussions online</a> where interesting concepts on extensions and conformance are being discussed.</p> +</li> +<li> +<p>Some « lighter » news but as serious: the future of ODF does not just depend on the OASIS ODF Technical Committee. It depends on you. You are encouraged to provide ideas for the future versions of ODF « ODF-Next » . The Committee has wanted this to be inclusive of everyone&#8217;s participation as explained <a href="http://opendocument.xml.org/news/oasis-welcomes-input-for-odf-next">here</a>.</p> +</li> +<li> +<p>We did know that at some point in time, Microsoft Office would support ODF. It seems the wait is <a href="http://blogs.technet.com/office_sustained_engineering/archive/2008/10/22/announcing-service-pack-2-sp2-for-the-2007-microsoft-office-system.aspx">almost over these days</a>. You will recall I was originally very supportive of the idea of Microsoft Office natively supporting ODF; then, I took some time reading the fine print and I grew a bit wary of what the Microsoft engineers were saying about the limits their implementation of ODF would be constrained to. At this point in time we do not have the Service Pack 2 of Microsoft Office 2007. What we do know however, is a couple of things that got me thinking: ODF support will only be available in the latest, patched version of Microsoft Office 2007. It will have some limitations and the feature will not be put prominently in the hands of the users, so to speak. I wonder why ODF shouldn&#8217;t be Microsoft Office&#8217;s default format or if the default configuration would be more effective with an icon on the user interface. After all, ODF is an ISO standard and people, governments, businesses demand it (at this stage it&#8217;s not even clear if OOXML was even requested by anyone who was not already part of Ecma and had vested interests in siding on with Microsoft&#8230;), so why not make that jump?</p> +</li> +<li> +<p>This also got me thinking: <em>ODF support in MS Office is a good idea.</em> <span>Don&#8217;t get me wrong on this. I wish however were extended to other products of the Microsoft stack, such as Sharepoint, Microsoft Dynamics and even Microsoft Internet Explorer. Why? I do not advocate this strategic move with ulterior motives of having Microsoft fail. Precisely not: The only way for Microsoft to survive is to embrace Open Standards, transparency and perhaps Open Source in some way. So let Microsoft do it the whole way. If the market demands ODF, let it have it and let it have a real choice, where Microsoft would actually be a compelling one for good. I am confident Microsoft folks are having some discussion on this internally. But there is at the very least two sides inside the company, and any attempt to play well with the Open Source Community (for the sake of not playing fair with the Free Software part of the community) is unfortunately matched by opposite and hostile moves.</span></p> +</li> +<li> +<p> <span>Which brings me to the Microsoft vs. Tom-Tom case. This is one more story where software patents hamper innovation. Add to this the general timing of the case: Tom-Tom is an European company operating in the automotive industry. You can understand now why the European Union has to stand firmly by its automotive sector&#8230;</span></p> +</li> +</ul> +<p><br clear="left" /></p> +<p class="akst_link"><a href="http://standardsandfreedom.net/?p=117&akst_action=share-this" title="E-mail this, post to del.icio.us, etc." id="akst_link_117" class="akst_share_link" rel="nofollow">Share This</a> +</p></content> + <author> + <name>Charles Schulz</name> + <uri>http://standardsandfreedom.net</uri> + </author> + <source> + <title type="html">Moved by Freedom - Powered by Standards » OOo Postings</title> + <subtitle type="html">A weblog by Charles-H. Schulz.</subtitle> + <link rel="self" href="http://standardsandfreedom.net/index.php/category/ooo-postings/feed"/> + <id>http://standardsandfreedom.net/index.php/category/ooo-postings/feed</id> + <updated>2009-03-03T18:00:18+00:00</updated> + </source> + </entry> + + <entry> <title type="html">Visit the OpenOffice.org Planet</title> <link href="http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS/entry/visit_the_openoffice_org_planet"/> <id>tag:google.com,2005:reader/item/4bf4c8489d81ecc1</id> @@ -24,7 +86,7 @@ <title type="html">jpmcc's shared items in Google Reader</title> <link rel="self" href="http://www.google.co.uk/reader/public/atom/user/06203502505240591501/state/com.google/broadcast"/> <id>tag:google.com,2005:reader/user/06203502505240591501/state/com.google/broadcast</id> - <updated>2009-03-03T12:00:16+00:00</updated> + <updated>2009-03-03T18:00:20+00:00</updated> </source> </entry> @@ -48,7 +110,7 @@ <subtitle type="html">Home of The Tiny Guide to OpenOffice.org</subtitle> <link rel="self" href="http://www.solidoffice.com/archives/category/openofficeorg/feed"/> <id>http://www.solidoffice.com/archives/category/openofficeorg/feed</id> - <updated>2009-03-02T18:00:32+00:00</updated> + <updated>2009-03-03T18:00:39+00:00</updated> </source> </entry> @@ -69,7 +131,7 @@ <title type="html">jpmcc's shared items in Google Reader</title> <link rel="self" href="http://www.google.co.uk/reader/public/atom/user/06203502505240591501/state/com.google/broadcast"/> <id>tag:google.com,2005:reader/user/06203502505240591501/state/com.google/broadcast</id> - <updated>2009-03-03T12:00:16+00:00</updated> + <updated>2009-03-03T18:00:20+00:00</updated> </source> </entry> @@ -90,7 +152,7 @@ Okay, sometimes you can read about Lotus Notes too</subtitle> <link rel="self" href="http://lodahl.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default/-/OpenOffice.org"/> <id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5198340507565233169</id> - <updated>2009-03-01T18:00:27+00:00</updated> + <updated>2009-03-03T18:00:37+00:00</updated> </source> </entry> @@ -115,7 +177,7 @@ <title type="html">jpmcc's shared items in Google Reader</title> <link rel="self" href="http://www.google.co.uk/reader/public/atom/user/06203502505240591501/state/com.google/broadcast"/> <id>tag:google.com,2005:reader/user/06203502505240591501/state/com.google/broadcast</id> - <updated>2009-03-03T12:00:16+00:00</updated> + <updated>2009-03-03T18:00:20+00:00</updated> </source> </entry> @@ -136,7 +198,7 @@ Okay, sometimes you can read about Lotus Notes too</subtitle> <link rel="self" href="http://lodahl.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default/-/OpenOffice.org"/> <id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5198340507565233169</id> - <updated>2009-03-01T18:00:27+00:00</updated> + <updated>2009-03-03T18:00:37+00:00</updated> </source> </entry> @@ -158,7 +220,7 @@ <subtitle type="html">Home of The Tiny Guide to OpenOffice.org</subtitle> <link rel="self" href="http://www.solidoffice.com/archives/category/openofficeorg/feed"/> <id>http://www.solidoffice.com/archives/category/openofficeorg/feed</id> - <updated>2009-03-02T18:00:32+00:00</updated> + <updated>2009-03-03T18:00:39+00:00</updated> </source> </entry> @@ -179,7 +241,7 @@ Okay, sometimes you can read about Lotus Notes too</subtitle> <link rel="self" href="http://lodahl.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default/-/OpenOffice.org"/> <id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5198340507565233169</id> - <updated>2009-03-01T18:00:27+00:00</updated> + <updated>2009-03-03T18:00:37+00:00</updated> </source> </entry> @@ -344,7 +406,7 @@ <title type="html">jpmcc's shared items in Google Reader</title> <link rel="self" href="http://www.google.co.uk/reader/public/atom/user/06203502505240591501/state/com.google/broadcast"/> <id>tag:google.com,2005:reader/user/06203502505240591501/state/com.google/broadcast</id> - <updated>2009-03-03T12:00:16+00:00</updated> + <updated>2009-03-03T18:00:20+00:00</updated> </source> </entry> @@ -365,7 +427,7 @@ <subtitle type="html">Home of The Tiny Guide to OpenOffice.org</subtitle> <link rel="self" href="http://www.solidoffice.com/archives/category/openofficeorg/feed"/> <id>http://www.solidoffice.com/archives/category/openofficeorg/feed</id> - <updated>2009-03-02T18:00:32+00:00</updated> + <updated>2009-03-03T18:00:39+00:00</updated> </source> </entry> @@ -427,68 +489,4 @@ </source> </entry> - <entry> - <title type="html">Still have some wishes for Base?</title> - <link href="http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS/entry/still_have_some_wishes_for"/> - <id>tag:google.com,2005:reader/item/d1987600f0c8e2c6</id> - <updated>2009-02-19T08:16:15+00:00</updated> - <content type="html"><p>Recently, I <a href="http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS/entry/if_you_had_3_wishes">asked</a> -which <a href="http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Base/Features/Pool">features</a> -you would most like to see implemented in <a href="http://dba.openoffice.org/">OpenOffice.org -Base</a>. I asked you to send your feedback to -<a href="mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a>.</p> - <p>Now, my inherent inability to master complex technology (though -sometimes, I hope that this applies to collab.net's technology only) -let me do a mistake when setting up this mailing list: I created it -as âdiscussâ-type mailing list, which sounded appropriate. As I -learned recently, âdiscussâ lists <i>silently</i> drop all mails -from non-subscribers. Oh dear! The only subscriber was /me, and so -all my test mails made it through, but none of the (certainly -billions) mails you sent. How awkward â¦</p> - <p>So, if you kindly resend your mail (yes, I changed the list type -meanwhile), that'd be great!</p> - <p>To repeat (in short â for the long version, see my <a href="http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS/entry/if_you_had_3_wishes">previous -blog entry</a>) what this call for participation is about:<br />Distribute -10 points amongts the items in the <a href="http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Base/Features/Pool">Base -Feature Pool</a>, and send this to <a href="mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a>. -We'll collect the results, publish them, and we will -let them influence our decisions on where to spend the development -resources for the next release(s).<br />The extended deadline for the poll is March, 1<sup>st</sup> 2009.</p> - <p>Thanks for your participation! <br /></p></content> - <author> - <name>Frank Schönheit</name> - <uri></uri> - </author> - <source> - <title type="html">jpmcc's shared items in Google Reader</title> - <link rel="self" href="http://www.google.co.uk/reader/public/atom/user/06203502505240591501/state/com.google/broadcast"/> - <id>tag:google.com,2005:reader/user/06203502505240591501/state/com.google/broadcast</id> - <updated>2009-03-03T12:00:16+00:00</updated> - </source> - </entry> - - <entry xml:lang="en"> - <title type="html">OOo 3.1âs Antialiasing Upgrade</title> - <link href="http://www.solidoffice.com/archives/1014"/> - <id>http://www.solidoffice.com/?p=1014</id> - <updated>2009-02-18T13:32:47+00:00</updated> - <content type="html"><p>OpenOffice.org 3.1 is the next upcoming release of OOo, and among the new features it will include is a very visible improvement to graphics, in the form of antialiasing support.</p> -<p>Armin Le Grand describes what to expect in his post <a href="http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS/entry/finally_anti_aliasing_is_done"><em>Finally: Anti Aliasing is Done for OOo 3.1</em></a> for the <a href="http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS/">GullFOSS blog</a>. One of the most obvious improvements is in the display of charts:</p> -<div id="attachment_1016" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><img class="size-full wp-image-1016" title="Antialiasing an OOo Chart" src="http://www.solidoffice.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/ooo-antialiasing.jpg" alt="Antialiasing an OOo Chart" width="422" height="289" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Antialiasing an OOo Chart</p></div> -<p>The improvements that allow this attractive antialiasing also bring along other improvements, including better geometric processing for all vector graphics, with further upgrades planned for the future:</p> -<blockquote><p>The extended DrawingLayer starting from OOo 3.1 will allow more graphical enhancements in the future. As an example, Full Object Drag as a feature for OOo 3.1 is realized using the new functionalities. You may also have noticed the enhanced selection visualizations in the Applications, also a result of those internal changes.</p></blockquote> -<p>I make heavy use of Draw to create flowcharts and webpage wireframes, so these graphical enhancements will be a welcome enhancement to my work processes.</p></content> - <author> - <name>Benjamin Horst</name> - <uri>http://www.solidoffice.com</uri> - </author> - <source> - <title type="html">SolidOffice » OpenOffice.org</title> - <subtitle type="html">Home of The Tiny Guide to OpenOffice.org</subtitle> - <link rel="self" href="http://www.solidoffice.com/archives/category/openofficeorg/feed"/> - <id>http://www.solidoffice.com/archives/category/openofficeorg/feed</id> - <updated>2009-03-02T18:00:32+00:00</updated> - </source> - </entry> - </feed> File [changed]: index.html Url: http://marketing.openoffice.org/source/browse/marketing/www/planet/index.html?r1=1.1587&r2=1.1588 Delta lines: +52 -58 --------------------- --- index.html 2009-03-03 12:01:01+0000 1.1587 +++ index.html 2009-03-03 18:01:20+0000 1.1588 @@ -36,8 +36,59 @@ <a href="rss20.xml"><img src="rss2.gif" alt="Link to RSS 2 feed" /></a> </div> -<p><em>Bloggings on marketing topics by project members - see <a href="#disclaimer">disclaimer</a>.<br />Last updated: March 03, 2009 12:00 PM GMT</em></p> +<p><em>Bloggings on marketing topics by project members - see <a href="#disclaimer">disclaimer</a>.<br />Last updated: March 03, 2009 06:00 PM GMT</em></p> +<h2>March 03, 2009</h2> +<h3> +<a href="http://lodahl.blogspot.com/search/label/OpenOffice.org"; title="Lodahl's blog"> +Leif Lodahl</a> : +<a href="http://lodahl.blogspot.com/2009/03/translating-openofficeorg-extensions.html";> +Translating OpenOffice.org extensions</a> +</h3> +<p> +One very important feature in OpenOffice.org is the ability to extend the functionality of the program with extensions. Most public extensions can be found in the official extension repository here: http://extensions.services.openoffice.org/.It is very important for the community, that as many extensions as possible are localized or translated into as many languages as possible. There is a tool</p> +<p> +<em><a href="http://lodahl.blogspot.com/2009/03/translating-openofficeorg-extensions.html";>by Leif Lodahl ([email protected]) at March 03, 2009 02:44 PM GMT</a></em> +</p> +<br /> +<hr /> +<br /> +<h3> +<a href="http://standardsandfreedom.net"; title="Moved by Freedom - Powered by Standards » OOo Postings"> +Charles Schulz</a> : +<a href="http://standardsandfreedom.net/index.php/2009/03/03/thirty-years-old-and-still-no-tom-tom/";> +Thirty years old and still no Tom-Tomâ¦</a> +</h3> +<p> +<p><a href="http://www.laquadrature.net/HADOPI"; title="HADOPI - Le Net en France : black-out"><img src="http://media.laquadrature.net/Quadrature_black-out_HADOPI_728x90px.gif"; border="0" alt="HADOPI - Le Net en France : black-out" /></a></p> +<p>Today I am thirty. And today, I have decided I would post a blog that would not be different from the my other posts. How’s that for genuine originality? So today’s topic will be a round-up of news on OpenDocument Format (ODF). It has been a long time I haven’t updated this area.</p> +<p> </p> +<ul> +<li> +<p>ODF 1.2 is well underway. The arrival of a flurry of new members inside the ODF Technical Committee who have illustrated themselves as proponents of OOXML is a bit fun to watch I must say. But I have to command the general serenity of the Committee and its chairs, Rob Weir and Michael Brauer for their quiet and effective management of the proceedings. I think the only thing that is to be hoped for is that we can finish the completion of this ODF sub-version. Also, and of some interest, I can only recommend <a href="http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office/";>the reading of the archives of the Committee’s discussions online</a> where interesting concepts on extensions and conformance are being discussed.</p> +</li> +<li> +<p>Some « lighter » news but as serious: the future of ODF does not just depend on the OASIS ODF Technical Committee. It depends on you. You are encouraged to provide ideas for the future versions of ODF « ODF-Next » . The Committee has wanted this to be inclusive of everyone’s participation as explained <a href="http://opendocument.xml.org/news/oasis-welcomes-input-for-odf-next";>here</a>.</p> +</li> +<li> +<p>We did know that at some point in time, Microsoft Office would support ODF. It seems the wait is <a href="http://blogs.technet.com/office_sustained_engineering/archive/2008/10/22/announcing-service-pack-2-sp2-for-the-2007-microsoft-office-system.aspx";>almost over these days</a>. You will recall I was originally very supportive of the idea of Microsoft Office natively supporting ODF; then, I took some time reading the fine print and I grew a bit wary of what the Microsoft engineers were saying about the limits their implementation of ODF would be constrained to. At this point in time we do not have the Service Pack 2 of Microsoft Office 2007. What we do know however, is a couple of things that got me thinking: ODF support will only be available in the latest, patched version of Microsoft Office 2007. It will have some limitations and the feature will not be put prominently in the hands of the users, so to speak. I wonder why ODF shouldn’t be Microsoft Office’s default format or if the default configuration would be more effective with an icon on the user interface. After all, ODF is an ISO standard and people, governments, businesses demand it (at this stage it’s not even clear if OOXML was even requested by anyone who was not already part of Ecma and had vested interests in siding on with Microsoft…), so why not make that jump?</p> +</li> +<li> +<p>This also got me thinking: <em>ODF support in MS Office is a good idea.</em> <span>Don’t get me wrong on this. I wish however were extended to other products of the Microsoft stack, such as Sharepoint, Microsoft Dynamics and even Microsoft Internet Explorer. Why? I do not advocate this strategic move with ulterior motives of having Microsoft fail. Precisely not: The only way for Microsoft to survive is to embrace Open Standards, transparency and perhaps Open Source in some way. So let Microsoft do it the whole way. If the market demands ODF, let it have it and let it have a real choice, where Microsoft would actually be a compelling one for good. I am confident Microsoft folks are having some discussion on this internally. But there is at the very least two sides inside the company, and any attempt to play well with the Open Source Community (for the sake of not playing fair with the Free Software part of the community) is unfortunately matched by opposite and hostile moves.</span></p> +</li> +<li> +<p> <span>Which brings me to the Microsoft vs. Tom-Tom case. This is one more story where software patents hamper innovation. Add to this the general timing of the case: Tom-Tom is an European company operating in the automotive industry. You can understand now why the European Union has to stand firmly by its automotive sector…</span></p> +</li> +</ul> +<p><br clear="left" /></p> +<p class="akst_link"><a href="http://standardsandfreedom.net/?p=117&akst_action=share-this"; title="E-mail this, post to del.icio.us, etc." id="akst_link_117" class="akst_share_link" rel="nofollow">Share This</a> +</p></p> +<p> +<em><a href="http://standardsandfreedom.net/index.php/2009/03/03/thirty-years-old-and-still-no-tom-tom/";>by Charles at March 03, 2009 01:35 PM GMT</a></em> +</p> +<br /> +<hr /> +<br /> <h2>March 02, 2009</h2> <h3> <a href="" title="jpmcc's shared items in Google Reader"> @@ -371,63 +422,6 @@ <br /> <hr /> <br /> -<h2>February 19, 2009</h2> -<h3> -<a href="" title="jpmcc's shared items in Google Reader"> -GullFOSS</a> : -<a href="http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS/entry/still_have_some_wishes_for";> -Still have some wishes for Base?</a> -</h3> -<p> -<p>Recently, I <a href="http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS/entry/if_you_had_3_wishes";>asked</a> -which <a href="http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Base/Features/Pool";>features</a> -you would most like to see implemented in <a href="http://dba.openoffice.org/";>OpenOffice.org -Base</a>. I asked you to send your feedback to -<a href="mailto:[email protected]";>[email protected]</a>.</p> - <p>Now, my inherent inability to master complex technology (though -sometimes, I hope that this applies to collab.net's technology only) -let me do a mistake when setting up this mailing list: I created it -as âdiscussâ-type mailing list, which sounded appropriate. As I -learned recently, âdiscussâ lists <i>silently</i> drop all mails -from non-subscribers. Oh dear! The only subscriber was /me, and so -all my test mails made it through, but none of the (certainly -billions) mails you sent. How awkward â¦</p> - <p>So, if you kindly resend your mail (yes, I changed the list type -meanwhile), that'd be great!</p> - <p>To repeat (in short â for the long version, see my <a href="http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS/entry/if_you_had_3_wishes";>previous -blog entry</a>) what this call for participation is about:<br />Distribute -10 points amongts the items in the <a href="http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Base/Features/Pool";>Base -Feature Pool</a>, and send this to <a href="mailto:[email protected]";>[email protected]</a>. -We'll collect the results, publish them, and we will -let them influence our decisions on where to spend the development -resources for the next release(s).<br />The extended deadline for the poll is March, 1<sup>st</sup> 2009.</p> - <p>Thanks for your participation! <br /></p></p> -<p> -<em><a href="http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS/entry/still_have_some_wishes_for";>by Frank Schönheit at February 19, 2009 08:16 AM GMT</a></em> -</p> -<br /> -<hr /> -<br /> -<h2>February 18, 2009</h2> -<h3> -<a href="http://www.solidoffice.com"; title="SolidOffice » OpenOffice.org"> -Benjamin Horst</a> : -<a href="http://www.solidoffice.com/archives/1014";> -OOo 3.1âs Antialiasing Upgrade</a> -</h3> -<p> -<p>OpenOffice.org 3.1 is the next upcoming release of OOo, and among the new features it will include is a very visible improvement to graphics, in the form of antialiasing support.</p> -<p>Armin Le Grand describes what to expect in his post <a href="http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS/entry/finally_anti_aliasing_is_done";><em>Finally: Anti Aliasing is Done for OOo 3.1</em></a> for the <a href="http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS/";>GullFOSS blog</a>. One of the most obvious improvements is in the display of charts:</p> -<div id="attachment_1016" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><img class="size-full wp-image-1016" title="Antialiasing an OOo Chart" src="http://www.solidoffice.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/ooo-antialiasing.jpg"; alt="Antialiasing an OOo Chart" width="422" height="289" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Antialiasing an OOo Chart</p></div> -<p>The improvements that allow this attractive antialiasing also bring along other improvements, including better geometric processing for all vector graphics, with further upgrades planned for the future:</p> -<blockquote><p>The extended DrawingLayer starting from OOo 3.1 will allow more graphical enhancements in the future. As an example, Full Object Drag as a feature for OOo 3.1 is realized using the new functionalities. You may also have noticed the enhanced selection visualizations in the Applications, also a result of those internal changes.</p></blockquote> -<p>I make heavy use of Draw to create flowcharts and webpage wireframes, so these graphical enhancements will be a welcome enhancement to my work processes.</p></p> -<p> -<em><a href="http://www.solidoffice.com/archives/1014";>by Benjamin Horst at February 18, 2009 01:32 PM GMT</a></em> -</p> -<br /> -<hr /> -<br /> <a id="disclaimer" name="disclaimer"></a> <p><em>Disclaimer: all views expressed on this page are those of the individual contributors, and may not reflect the views of the File [changed]: opml.xml Url: http://marketing.openoffice.org/source/browse/marketing/www/planet/opml.xml?r1=1.1580&r2=1.1581 Delta lines: +1 -1 ------------------- --- opml.xml 2009-03-03 12:01:01+0000 1.1580 +++ opml.xml 2009-03-03 18:01:20+0000 1.1581 @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ <opml version="1.1"> <head> <title>Marketing Planet</title> - <dateModified>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 12:00:21 +0000</dateModified> + <dateModified>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 18:00:40 +0000</dateModified> <ownerName>Marketing Project</ownerName> <ownerEmail>[email protected]</ownerEmail> </head> File [changed]: rss10.xml Url: http://marketing.openoffice.org/source/browse/marketing/www/planet/rss10.xml?r1=1.665&r2=1.666 Delta lines: +37 -42 --------------------- --- rss10.xml 2009-03-03 00:01:09+0000 1.665 +++ rss10.xml 2009-03-03 18:01:20+0000 1.666 @@ -13,6 +13,8 @@ <items> <rdf:Seq> + <rdf:li rdf:resource="tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5198340507565233169.post-7888011759649598452" /> + <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://standardsandfreedom.net/index.php/2009/03/03/thirty-years-old-and-still-no-tom-tom/"; /> <rdf:li rdf:resource="tag:google.com,2005:reader/item/4bf4c8489d81ecc1" /> <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.solidoffice.com/?p=1040"; /> <rdf:li rdf:resource="tag:google.com,2005:reader/item/5a4e9f39d334a4d0" /> @@ -31,12 +33,45 @@ <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.solidoffice.com/?p=1022"; /> <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mealldubh.org/?p=636"; /> <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.italovignoli.org/2009/02/openofficeorg-7-things-you-didnt-know-you-could-do/"; /> - <rdf:li rdf:resource="tag:google.com,2005:reader/item/d1987600f0c8e2c6" /> - <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.solidoffice.com/?p=1014"; /> </rdf:Seq> </items> </channel> +<item rdf:about="tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5198340507565233169.post-7888011759649598452"> + <title>Leif Lodahl: Translating OpenOffice.org extensions</title> + <link>http://lodahl.blogspot.com/2009/03/translating-openofficeorg-extensions.html</link> + <content:encoded>One very important feature in OpenOffice.org is the ability to extend the functionality of the program with extensions. Most public extensions can be found in the official extension repository here: http://extensions.services.openoffice.org/.It is very important for the community, that as many extensions as possible are localized or translated into as many languages as possible. There is a tool</content:encoded> + <dc:date>2009-03-03T14:44:04+00:00</dc:date> + <dc:creator>Leif Lodahl</dc:creator> +</item> +<item rdf:about="http://standardsandfreedom.net/index.php/2009/03/03/thirty-years-old-and-still-no-tom-tom/";> + <title>Charles Schulz: Thirty years old and still no Tom-Tomâ¦</title> + <link>http://standardsandfreedom.net/index.php/2009/03/03/thirty-years-old-and-still-no-tom-tom/</link> + <content:encoded><p><a href="http://www.laquadrature.net/HADOPI" title="HADOPI - Le Net en France : black-out"><img src="http://media.laquadrature.net/Quadrature_black-out_HADOPI_728x90px.gif" border="0" alt="HADOPI - Le Net en France : black-out" /></a></p> +<p>Today I am thirty. And today, I have decided I would post a blog that would not be different from the my other posts. How&#8217;s that for genuine originality? So today&#8217;s topic will be a round-up of news on OpenDocument Format (ODF). It has been a long time I haven&#8217;t updated this area.</p> +<p>&nbsp;</p> +<ul> +<li> +<p>ODF 1.2 is well underway. The arrival of a flurry of new members inside the ODF Technical Committee who have illustrated themselves as proponents of OOXML is a bit fun to watch I must say. But I have to command the general serenity of the Committee and its chairs, Rob Weir and Michael Brauer for their quiet and effective management of the proceedings. I think the only thing that is to be hoped for is that we can finish the completion of this ODF sub-version. Also, and of some interest, I can only recommend <a href="http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office/">the reading of the archives of the Committee&#8217;s discussions online</a> where interesting concepts on extensions and conformance are being discussed.</p> +</li> +<li> +<p>Some « lighter » news but as serious: the future of ODF does not just depend on the OASIS ODF Technical Committee. It depends on you. You are encouraged to provide ideas for the future versions of ODF « ODF-Next » . The Committee has wanted this to be inclusive of everyone&#8217;s participation as explained <a href="http://opendocument.xml.org/news/oasis-welcomes-input-for-odf-next">here</a>.</p> +</li> +<li> +<p>We did know that at some point in time, Microsoft Office would support ODF. It seems the wait is <a href="http://blogs.technet.com/office_sustained_engineering/archive/2008/10/22/announcing-service-pack-2-sp2-for-the-2007-microsoft-office-system.aspx">almost over these days</a>. You will recall I was originally very supportive of the idea of Microsoft Office natively supporting ODF; then, I took some time reading the fine print and I grew a bit wary of what the Microsoft engineers were saying about the limits their implementation of ODF would be constrained to. At this point in time we do not have the Service Pack 2 of Microsoft Office 2007. What we do know however, is a couple of things that got me thinking: ODF support will only be available in the latest, patched version of Microsoft Office 2007. It will have some limitations and the feature will not be put prominently in the hands of the users, so to speak. I wonder why ODF shouldn&#8217;t be Microsoft Office&#8217;s default format or if the default configuration would be more effective with an icon on the user interface. After all, ODF is an ISO standard and people, governments, businesses demand it (at this stage it&#8217;s not even clear if OOXML was even requested by anyone who was not already part of Ecma and had vested interests in siding on with Microsoft&#8230;), so why not make that jump?</p> +</li> +<li> +<p>This also got me thinking: <em>ODF support in MS Office is a good idea.</em> <span>Don&#8217;t get me wrong on this. I wish however were extended to other products of the Microsoft stack, such as Sharepoint, Microsoft Dynamics and even Microsoft Internet Explorer. Why? I do not advocate this strategic move with ulterior motives of having Microsoft fail. Precisely not: The only way for Microsoft to survive is to embrace Open Standards, transparency and perhaps Open Source in some way. So let Microsoft do it the whole way. If the market demands ODF, let it have it and let it have a real choice, where Microsoft would actually be a compelling one for good. I am confident Microsoft folks are having some discussion on this internally. But there is at the very least two sides inside the company, and any attempt to play well with the Open Source Community (for the sake of not playing fair with the Free Software part of the community) is unfortunately matched by opposite and hostile moves.</span></p> +</li> +<li> +<p> <span>Which brings me to the Microsoft vs. Tom-Tom case. This is one more story where software patents hamper innovation. Add to this the general timing of the case: Tom-Tom is an European company operating in the automotive industry. You can understand now why the European Union has to stand firmly by its automotive sector&#8230;</span></p> +</li> +</ul> +<p><br clear="left" /></p> +<p class="akst_link"><a href="http://standardsandfreedom.net/?p=117&akst_action=share-this" title="E-mail this, post to del.icio.us, etc." id="akst_link_117" class="akst_share_link" rel="nofollow">Share This</a> +</p></content:encoded> + <dc:date>2009-03-03T13:35:56+00:00</dc:date> +</item> <item rdf:about="tag:google.com,2005:reader/item/4bf4c8489d81ecc1"> <title>GullFOSS: Visit the OpenOffice.org Planet</title> <link>http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS/entry/visit_the_openoffice_org_planet</link> @@ -227,45 +262,5 @@ </div><img src="http://feeds2.feedburner.com/~r/ItalosOOoBlog/~4/vR7Rr3Hty3E" height="1" width="1" /></content:encoded> <dc:date>2009-02-20T16:09:24+00:00</dc:date> </item> -<item rdf:about="tag:google.com,2005:reader/item/d1987600f0c8e2c6"> - <title>GullFOSS: Still have some wishes for Base?</title> - <link>http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS/entry/still_have_some_wishes_for</link> - <content:encoded><p>Recently, I <a href="http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS/entry/if_you_had_3_wishes">asked</a> -which <a href="http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Base/Features/Pool">features</a> -you would most like to see implemented in <a href="http://dba.openoffice.org/">OpenOffice.org -Base</a>. I asked you to send your feedback to -<a href="mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a>.</p> - <p>Now, my inherent inability to master complex technology (though -sometimes, I hope that this applies to collab.net's technology only) -let me do a mistake when setting up this mailing list: I created it -as âdiscussâ-type mailing list, which sounded appropriate. As I -learned recently, âdiscussâ lists <i>silently</i> drop all mails -from non-subscribers. Oh dear! The only subscriber was /me, and so -all my test mails made it through, but none of the (certainly -billions) mails you sent. How awkward â¦</p> - <p>So, if you kindly resend your mail (yes, I changed the list type -meanwhile), that'd be great!</p> - <p>To repeat (in short â for the long version, see my <a href="http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS/entry/if_you_had_3_wishes">previous -blog entry</a>) what this call for participation is about:<br />Distribute -10 points amongts the items in the <a href="http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Base/Features/Pool">Base -Feature Pool</a>, and send this to <a href="mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a>. -We'll collect the results, publish them, and we will -let them influence our decisions on where to spend the development -resources for the next release(s).<br />The extended deadline for the poll is March, 1<sup>st</sup> 2009.</p> - <p>Thanks for your participation! <br /></p></content:encoded> - <dc:date>2009-02-19T08:16:15+00:00</dc:date> - <dc:creator>Frank Schönheit</dc:creator> -</item> -<item rdf:about="http://www.solidoffice.com/?p=1014";> - <title>Benjamin Horst: OOo 3.1âs Antialiasing Upgrade</title> - <link>http://www.solidoffice.com/archives/1014</link> - <content:encoded><p>OpenOffice.org 3.1 is the next upcoming release of OOo, and among the new features it will include is a very visible improvement to graphics, in the form of antialiasing support.</p> -<p>Armin Le Grand describes what to expect in his post <a href="http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS/entry/finally_anti_aliasing_is_done"><em>Finally: Anti Aliasing is Done for OOo 3.1</em></a> for the <a href="http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS/">GullFOSS blog</a>. One of the most obvious improvements is in the display of charts:</p> -<div id="attachment_1016" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><img class="size-full wp-image-1016" title="Antialiasing an OOo Chart" src="http://www.solidoffice.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/ooo-antialiasing.jpg" alt="Antialiasing an OOo Chart" width="422" height="289" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Antialiasing an OOo Chart</p></div> -<p>The improvements that allow this attractive antialiasing also bring along other improvements, including better geometric processing for all vector graphics, with further upgrades planned for the future:</p> -<blockquote><p>The extended DrawingLayer starting from OOo 3.1 will allow more graphical enhancements in the future. As an example, Full Object Drag as a feature for OOo 3.1 is realized using the new functionalities. You may also have noticed the enhanced selection visualizations in the Applications, also a result of those internal changes.</p></blockquote> -<p>I make heavy use of Draw to create flowcharts and webpage wireframes, so these graphical enhancements will be a welcome enhancement to my work processes.</p></content:encoded> - <dc:date>2009-02-18T13:32:47+00:00</dc:date> -</item> </rdf:RDF> File [changed]: rss20.xml Url: http://marketing.openoffice.org/source/browse/marketing/www/planet/rss20.xml?r1=1.665&r2=1.666 Delta lines: +37 -41 --------------------- --- rss20.xml 2009-03-03 00:01:09+0000 1.665 +++ rss20.xml 2009-03-03 18:01:20+0000 1.666 @@ -8,6 +8,43 @@ <description>Marketing Planet - http://marketing.openoffice.org/planet/</description> <item> + <title>Leif Lodahl: Translating OpenOffice.org extensions</title> + <guid>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5198340507565233169.post-7888011759649598452</guid> + <link>http://lodahl.blogspot.com/2009/03/translating-openofficeorg-extensions.html</link> + <description>One very important feature in OpenOffice.org is the ability to extend the functionality of the program with extensions. Most public extensions can be found in the official extension repository here: http://extensions.services.openoffice.org/.It is very important for the community, that as many extensions as possible are localized or translated into as many languages as possible. There is a tool</description> + <pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 14:44:04 +0000</pubDate> + <author>[email protected] (Leif Lodahl)</author> +</item> +<item> + <title>Charles Schulz: Thirty years old and still no Tom-Tomâ¦</title> + <guid>http://standardsandfreedom.net/index.php/2009/03/03/thirty-years-old-and-still-no-tom-tom/</guid> + <link>http://standardsandfreedom.net/index.php/2009/03/03/thirty-years-old-and-still-no-tom-tom/</link> + <description><p><a href="http://www.laquadrature.net/HADOPI" title="HADOPI - Le Net en France : black-out"><img src="http://media.laquadrature.net/Quadrature_black-out_HADOPI_728x90px.gif" border="0" alt="HADOPI - Le Net en France : black-out" /></a></p> +<p>Today I am thirty. And today, I have decided I would post a blog that would not be different from the my other posts. How&#8217;s that for genuine originality? So today&#8217;s topic will be a round-up of news on OpenDocument Format (ODF). It has been a long time I haven&#8217;t updated this area.</p> +<p>&nbsp;</p> +<ul> +<li> +<p>ODF 1.2 is well underway. The arrival of a flurry of new members inside the ODF Technical Committee who have illustrated themselves as proponents of OOXML is a bit fun to watch I must say. But I have to command the general serenity of the Committee and its chairs, Rob Weir and Michael Brauer for their quiet and effective management of the proceedings. I think the only thing that is to be hoped for is that we can finish the completion of this ODF sub-version. Also, and of some interest, I can only recommend <a href="http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office/">the reading of the archives of the Committee&#8217;s discussions online</a> where interesting concepts on extensions and conformance are being discussed.</p> +</li> +<li> +<p>Some « lighter » news but as serious: the future of ODF does not just depend on the OASIS ODF Technical Committee. It depends on you. You are encouraged to provide ideas for the future versions of ODF « ODF-Next » . The Committee has wanted this to be inclusive of everyone&#8217;s participation as explained <a href="http://opendocument.xml.org/news/oasis-welcomes-input-for-odf-next">here</a>.</p> +</li> +<li> +<p>We did know that at some point in time, Microsoft Office would support ODF. It seems the wait is <a href="http://blogs.technet.com/office_sustained_engineering/archive/2008/10/22/announcing-service-pack-2-sp2-for-the-2007-microsoft-office-system.aspx">almost over these days</a>. You will recall I was originally very supportive of the idea of Microsoft Office natively supporting ODF; then, I took some time reading the fine print and I grew a bit wary of what the Microsoft engineers were saying about the limits their implementation of ODF would be constrained to. At this point in time we do not have the Service Pack 2 of Microsoft Office 2007. What we do know however, is a couple of things that got me thinking: ODF support will only be available in the latest, patched version of Microsoft Office 2007. It will have some limitations and the feature will not be put prominently in the hands of the users, so to speak. I wonder why ODF shouldn&#8217;t be Microsoft Office&#8217;s default format or if the default configuration would be more effective with an icon on the user interface. After all, ODF is an ISO standard and people, governments, businesses demand it (at this stage it&#8217;s not even clear if OOXML was even requested by anyone who was not already part of Ecma and had vested interests in siding on with Microsoft&#8230;), so why not make that jump?</p> +</li> +<li> +<p>This also got me thinking: <em>ODF support in MS Office is a good idea.</em> <span>Don&#8217;t get me wrong on this. I wish however were extended to other products of the Microsoft stack, such as Sharepoint, Microsoft Dynamics and even Microsoft Internet Explorer. Why? I do not advocate this strategic move with ulterior motives of having Microsoft fail. Precisely not: The only way for Microsoft to survive is to embrace Open Standards, transparency and perhaps Open Source in some way. So let Microsoft do it the whole way. If the market demands ODF, let it have it and let it have a real choice, where Microsoft would actually be a compelling one for good. I am confident Microsoft folks are having some discussion on this internally. But there is at the very least two sides inside the company, and any attempt to play well with the Open Source Community (for the sake of not playing fair with the Free Software part of the community) is unfortunately matched by opposite and hostile moves.</span></p> +</li> +<li> +<p> <span>Which brings me to the Microsoft vs. Tom-Tom case. This is one more story where software patents hamper innovation. Add to this the general timing of the case: Tom-Tom is an European company operating in the automotive industry. You can understand now why the European Union has to stand firmly by its automotive sector&#8230;</span></p> +</li> +</ul> +<p><br clear="left" /></p> +<p class="akst_link"><a href="http://standardsandfreedom.net/?p=117&akst_action=share-this" title="E-mail this, post to del.icio.us, etc." id="akst_link_117" class="akst_share_link" rel="nofollow">Share This</a> +</p></description> + <pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 13:35:56 +0000</pubDate> +</item> +<item> <title>GullFOSS: Visit the OpenOffice.org Planet</title> <guid>tag:google.com,2005:reader/item/4bf4c8489d81ecc1</guid> <link>http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS/entry/visit_the_openoffice_org_planet</link> @@ -211,47 +248,6 @@ </div><img src="http://feeds2.feedburner.com/~r/ItalosOOoBlog/~4/vR7Rr3Hty3E" height="1" width="1" /></description> <pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 16:09:24 +0000</pubDate> </item> -<item> - <title>GullFOSS: Still have some wishes for Base?</title> - <guid>tag:google.com,2005:reader/item/d1987600f0c8e2c6</guid> - <link>http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS/entry/still_have_some_wishes_for</link> - <description><p>Recently, I <a href="http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS/entry/if_you_had_3_wishes">asked</a> -which <a href="http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Base/Features/Pool">features</a> -you would most like to see implemented in <a href="http://dba.openoffice.org/">OpenOffice.org -Base</a>. I asked you to send your feedback to -<a href="mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a>.</p> - <p>Now, my inherent inability to master complex technology (though -sometimes, I hope that this applies to collab.net's technology only) -let me do a mistake when setting up this mailing list: I created it -as âdiscussâ-type mailing list, which sounded appropriate. As I -learned recently, âdiscussâ lists <i>silently</i> drop all mails -from non-subscribers. Oh dear! The only subscriber was /me, and so -all my test mails made it through, but none of the (certainly -billions) mails you sent. How awkward â¦</p> - <p>So, if you kindly resend your mail (yes, I changed the list type -meanwhile), that'd be great!</p> - <p>To repeat (in short â for the long version, see my <a href="http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS/entry/if_you_had_3_wishes">previous -blog entry</a>) what this call for participation is about:<br />Distribute -10 points amongts the items in the <a href="http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Base/Features/Pool">Base -Feature Pool</a>, and send this to <a href="mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a>. -We'll collect the results, publish them, and we will -let them influence our decisions on where to spend the development -resources for the next release(s).<br />The extended deadline for the poll is March, 1<sup>st</sup> 2009.</p> - <p>Thanks for your participation! <br /></p></description> - <pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 08:16:15 +0000</pubDate> -</item> -<item> - <title>Benjamin Horst: OOo 3.1âs Antialiasing Upgrade</title> - <guid>http://www.solidoffice.com/?p=1014</guid> - <link>http://www.solidoffice.com/archives/1014</link> - <description><p>OpenOffice.org 3.1 is the next upcoming release of OOo, and among the new features it will include is a very visible improvement to graphics, in the form of antialiasing support.</p> -<p>Armin Le Grand describes what to expect in his post <a href="http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS/entry/finally_anti_aliasing_is_done"><em>Finally: Anti Aliasing is Done for OOo 3.1</em></a> for the <a href="http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS/">GullFOSS blog</a>. One of the most obvious improvements is in the display of charts:</p> -<div id="attachment_1016" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><img class="size-full wp-image-1016" title="Antialiasing an OOo Chart" src="http://www.solidoffice.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/ooo-antialiasing.jpg" alt="Antialiasing an OOo Chart" width="422" height="289" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Antialiasing an OOo Chart</p></div> -<p>The improvements that allow this attractive antialiasing also bring along other improvements, including better geometric processing for all vector graphics, with further upgrades planned for the future:</p> -<blockquote><p>The extended DrawingLayer starting from OOo 3.1 will allow more graphical enhancements in the future. As an example, Full Object Drag as a feature for OOo 3.1 is realized using the new functionalities. You may also have noticed the enhanced selection visualizations in the Applications, also a result of those internal changes.</p></blockquote> -<p>I make heavy use of Draw to create flowcharts and webpage wireframes, so these graphical enhancements will be a welcome enhancement to my work processes.</p></description> - <pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 13:32:47 +0000</pubDate> -</item> </channel> </rss> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
![http://media.laquadrature.net/Quadrature_black-out_HADOPI_728x90px.gif"](http://media.laquadrature.net/Quadrature_black-out_HADOPI_728x90px.gif"){kind=link}
![http://www.solidoffice.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/ooo-antialiasing.jpg"](http://www.solidoffice.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/ooo-antialiasing.jpg"){kind=link}
![http://media.laquadrature.net/Quadrature_black-out_HADOPI_728x90px.gif"](http://media.laquadrature.net/Quadrature_black-out_HADOPI_728x90px.gif"){kind=link}
![http://www.solidoffice.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/ooo-antialiasing.jpg"](http://www.solidoffice.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/ooo-antialiasing.jpg"){kind=link}