User: jpmcc Date: 2009-05-06 23:01:05+0000 Modified: marketing/www/planet/atom.xml marketing/www/planet/index.html marketing/www/planet/opml.xml marketing/www/planet/rss10.xml marketing/www/planet/rss20.xml
Log: Planet run at Thu May 7 00:00:18 BST 2009 File Changes: Directory: /marketing/www/planet/ ================================= File [changed]: atom.xml Url: http://marketing.openoffice.org/source/browse/marketing/www/planet/atom.xml?r1=1.1836&r2=1.1837 Delta lines: +45 -31 --------------------- --- atom.xml 2009-05-06 17:00:59+0000 1.1836 +++ atom.xml 2009-05-06 23:01:01+0000 1.1837 @@ -5,9 +5,43 @@ <link rel="self" href="http://marketing.openoffice.org/planet/atom.xml"/> <link href="http://marketing.openoffice.org/planet/"/> <id>http://marketing.openoffice.org/planet/atom.xml</id> - <updated>2009-05-06T17:00:37+00:00</updated> + <updated>2009-05-06T23:00:37+00:00</updated> <generator uri="http://www.planetplanet.org/";>Planet/2.0 +http://www.planetplanet.org</generator> + <entry xml:lang="en"> + <title type="html">ODF with no excuse</title> + <link href="http://standardsandfreedom.net/index.php/2009/05/06/odf-with-no-excuse/"/> + <id>http://standardsandfreedom.net/index.php/2009/05/06/odf-with-no-excuse/</id> + <updated>2009-05-06T17:12:09+00:00</updated> + <content type="html"><p> Reports start to appear in the press about the ODF support quality enabled by the Service Pack 2 inside Microsoft Office 2007. I could say that I&#8217;m not surprised,<br /> +but I somewhat had also expected the contrary. Unfortunately it seems we have here a poor implementation of ODF. If further reports confirm it (and I have no serious doubt they will),<br /> +we will have the case of a monopolistic vendor messing up its own implementation of an open standard and have no viable excuse for doing so.</p> +<p>If we are to believe several reports who all link to <a href="http://www.robweir.com/blog/2009/05/update-on-odf-spreadsheet.html">Rob Weir&#8217;s own thorough review</a> ,<br /> +Microsoft has not only done a poor job implementing ODF, it has also ended up into a quite unique <em>endless loop phenomenon</em> . What this basically means is that in some instances<br /> +ODF documents created by Microsoft Office will only be readable and editable in&#8230; Microsoft Office. How was this possible? Apparently when you want to mess up something, you always find ways to do so.</p> +<p>It would be very tempting to assume that if such a loop, as I call it, was possible, then the real technical flaw has been lying inside the standard&#8217;s specification for quite some time. And you know what?<br /> +This is obviously the case&#8230; otherwise it would not have been possible, or else, MS does not produce conforming ODF documents. But the worst part may not even be there.</p> +<p>What we should perhaps realize today, is that one company charged of monopolistic abuse, after having imposed its own office document standard at the ISO (this one being itself under investigation),<br /> +is now trying to break the existing interoperability with the ODF standard. It would not be the first time Microsoft would have had this strategy. But it just reveals how little has changed inside this company.</p> +<p>The intended effect, or should I say the risk, is that given a market share gained and maintained mostly by monopolistic practices and network effects, Microsoft Officer will lock its users in its very own,<br /> +incompatible and uninteroperable version of ODF. This is called <em>format filibustering</em> and it is an art Redmond has mastered over the years. I do urge Microsoft to reconsider these biased and unproductive practices.<br /> +They will only end up harming its customers. As for ODF, things are going to become very interesting, I think. This time, there is a real chance the market will not let Microsoft fool it again.<br /> +And what the market will ask for will be pure, unbiased ODF that can interact with various ODF-capable systems. This time, there will be no excuse.</p> +<p class="akst_link"><a href="http://standardsandfreedom.net/?p=124&akst_action=share-this" title="E-mail this, post to del.icio.us, etc." id="akst_link_124" class="akst_share_link" rel="nofollow">Share This</a> +</p></content> + <author> + <name>Charles Schulz</name> + <uri>http://standardsandfreedom.net</uri> + </author> + <source> + <title type="html">Moved by Freedom - Powered by Standards » OOo Postings</title> + <subtitle type="html">A weblog by Charles-H. Schulz.</subtitle> + <link rel="self" href="http://standardsandfreedom.net/index.php/category/ooo-postings/feed"/> + <id>http://standardsandfreedom.net/index.php/category/ooo-postings/feed</id> + <updated>2009-05-06T23:00:22+00:00</updated> + </source> + </entry> + <entry> <title type="html">OpenOffice.org LinuxTag partner booth</title> <link href="http://ooomarketing.blogspot.com/2009/05/openofficeorg-linuxtag-partner-booth.html"/> @@ -24,7 +58,7 @@ <subtitle type="html">News and interesting stories about OpenOffice.org and other open source solutions.</subtitle> <link rel="self" href="http://ooomarketing.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default"/> <id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4887643299605448632</id> - <updated>2009-05-06T17:00:35+00:00</updated> + <updated>2009-05-06T23:00:35+00:00</updated> </source> </entry> @@ -48,7 +82,7 @@ <title type="html">jpmcc's shared items in Google Reader</title> <link rel="self" href="http://www.google.co.uk/reader/public/atom/user/06203502505240591501/state/com.google/broadcast"/> <id>tag:google.com,2005:reader/user/06203502505240591501/state/com.google/broadcast</id> - <updated>2009-05-06T17:00:21+00:00</updated> + <updated>2009-05-06T23:00:23+00:00</updated> </source> </entry> @@ -91,7 +125,7 @@ <subtitle type="html">News and interesting stories about OpenOffice.org and other open source solutions.</subtitle> <link rel="self" href="http://ooomarketing.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default"/> <id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4887643299605448632</id> - <updated>2009-05-06T17:00:35+00:00</updated> + <updated>2009-05-06T23:00:35+00:00</updated> </source> </entry> @@ -229,7 +263,7 @@ <subtitle type="html">A weblog by Charles-H. Schulz.</subtitle> <link rel="self" href="http://standardsandfreedom.net/index.php/category/ooo-postings/feed"/> <id>http://standardsandfreedom.net/index.php/category/ooo-postings/feed</id> - <updated>2009-05-05T23:00:17+00:00</updated> + <updated>2009-05-06T23:00:22+00:00</updated> </source> </entry> @@ -254,7 +288,7 @@ <title type="html">jpmcc's shared items in Google Reader</title> <link rel="self" href="http://www.google.co.uk/reader/public/atom/user/06203502505240591501/state/com.google/broadcast"/> <id>tag:google.com,2005:reader/user/06203502505240591501/state/com.google/broadcast</id> - <updated>2009-05-06T17:00:21+00:00</updated> + <updated>2009-05-06T23:00:23+00:00</updated> </source> </entry> @@ -296,7 +330,7 @@ <title type="html">jpmcc's shared items in Google Reader</title> <link rel="self" href="http://www.google.co.uk/reader/public/atom/user/06203502505240591501/state/com.google/broadcast"/> <id>tag:google.com,2005:reader/user/06203502505240591501/state/com.google/broadcast</id> - <updated>2009-05-06T17:00:21+00:00</updated> + <updated>2009-05-06T23:00:23+00:00</updated> </source> </entry> @@ -349,7 +383,7 @@ <title type="html">jpmcc's shared items in Google Reader</title> <link rel="self" href="http://www.google.co.uk/reader/public/atom/user/06203502505240591501/state/com.google/broadcast"/> <id>tag:google.com,2005:reader/user/06203502505240591501/state/com.google/broadcast</id> - <updated>2009-05-06T17:00:21+00:00</updated> + <updated>2009-05-06T23:00:23+00:00</updated> </source> </entry> @@ -390,7 +424,7 @@ <subtitle type="html">News and interesting stories about OpenOffice.org and other open source solutions.</subtitle> <link rel="self" href="http://ooomarketing.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default"/> <id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4887643299605448632</id> - <updated>2009-05-06T17:00:35+00:00</updated> + <updated>2009-05-06T23:00:35+00:00</updated> </source> </entry> @@ -475,7 +509,7 @@ <subtitle type="html">A weblog by Charles-H. Schulz.</subtitle> <link rel="self" href="http://standardsandfreedom.net/index.php/category/ooo-postings/feed"/> <id>http://standardsandfreedom.net/index.php/category/ooo-postings/feed</id> - <updated>2009-05-05T23:00:17+00:00</updated> + <updated>2009-05-06T23:00:22+00:00</updated> </source> </entry> @@ -540,27 +574,7 @@ <subtitle type="html">News and interesting stories about OpenOffice.org and other open source solutions.</subtitle> <link rel="self" href="http://ooomarketing.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default"/> <id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4887643299605448632</id> - <updated>2009-05-06T17:00:35+00:00</updated> - </source> - </entry> - - <entry> - <title type="html">OpenOffice.org Special at Heise (German)</title> - <link href="http://ooomarketing.blogspot.com/2009/04/openofficeorg-special-at-heise-german.html"/> - <id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4887643299605448632.post-2059215242010135251</id> - <updated>2009-04-18T17:58:54+00:00</updated> - <content type="html">German publisher Heise just put online its OpenOffice.org Special, talking about extensions: <a href="http://www.heise.de/software/download/special/openoffice_lernt_dazu/57_1">http://www.heise.de/software/download/special/openoffice_lernt_dazu/57_1</a><div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width="1" height="1" src="http://res1.blogblog.com/tracker/4887643299605448632-2059215242010135251?l=ooomarketing.blogspot.com" /></div></content> - <author> - <name>floeff</name> - <email>[email protected]</email> - <uri>http://ooomarketing.blogspot.com/</uri> - </author> - <source> - <title type="html">OpenOffice.org Marketing Blog</title> - <subtitle type="html">News and interesting stories about OpenOffice.org and other open source solutions.</subtitle> - <link rel="self" href="http://ooomarketing.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default"/> - <id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4887643299605448632</id> - <updated>2009-05-06T17:00:35+00:00</updated> + <updated>2009-05-06T23:00:35+00:00</updated> </source> </entry> File [changed]: index.html Url: http://marketing.openoffice.org/source/browse/marketing/www/planet/index.html?r1=1.1843&r2=1.1844 Delta lines: +30 -15 --------------------- --- index.html 2009-05-06 17:00:59+0000 1.1843 +++ index.html 2009-05-06 23:01:02+0000 1.1844 @@ -36,10 +36,39 @@ <a href="rss20.xml"><img src="rss2.gif" alt="Link to RSS 2 feed" /></a> </div> -<p><em>Bloggings on marketing topics by project members - see <a href="#disclaimer">disclaimer</a>.<br />Last updated: May 06, 2009 05:00 PM GMT</em></p> +<p><em>Bloggings on marketing topics by project members - see <a href="#disclaimer">disclaimer</a>.<br />Last updated: May 06, 2009 11:00 PM GMT</em></p> <h2>May 06, 2009</h2> <h3> +<a href="http://standardsandfreedom.net"; title="Moved by Freedom - Powered by Standards » OOo Postings"> +Charles Schulz</a> : +<a href="http://standardsandfreedom.net/index.php/2009/05/06/odf-with-no-excuse/";> +ODF with no excuse</a> +</h3> +<p> +<p> Reports start to appear in the press about the ODF support quality enabled by the Service Pack 2 inside Microsoft Office 2007. I could say that I’m not surprised,<br /> +but I somewhat had also expected the contrary. Unfortunately it seems we have here a poor implementation of ODF. If further reports confirm it (and I have no serious doubt they will),<br /> +we will have the case of a monopolistic vendor messing up its own implementation of an open standard and have no viable excuse for doing so.</p> +<p>If we are to believe several reports who all link to <a href="http://www.robweir.com/blog/2009/05/update-on-odf-spreadsheet.html";>Rob Weir’s own thorough review</a> ,<br /> +Microsoft has not only done a poor job implementing ODF, it has also ended up into a quite unique <em>endless loop phenomenon</em> . What this basically means is that in some instances<br /> +ODF documents created by Microsoft Office will only be readable and editable in… Microsoft Office. How was this possible? Apparently when you want to mess up something, you always find ways to do so.</p> +<p>It would be very tempting to assume that if such a loop, as I call it, was possible, then the real technical flaw has been lying inside the standard’s specification for quite some time. And you know what?<br /> +This is obviously the case… otherwise it would not have been possible, or else, MS does not produce conforming ODF documents. But the worst part may not even be there.</p> +<p>What we should perhaps realize today, is that one company charged of monopolistic abuse, after having imposed its own office document standard at the ISO (this one being itself under investigation),<br /> +is now trying to break the existing interoperability with the ODF standard. It would not be the first time Microsoft would have had this strategy. But it just reveals how little has changed inside this company.</p> +<p>The intended effect, or should I say the risk, is that given a market share gained and maintained mostly by monopolistic practices and network effects, Microsoft Officer will lock its users in its very own,<br /> +incompatible and uninteroperable version of ODF. This is called <em>format filibustering</em> and it is an art Redmond has mastered over the years. I do urge Microsoft to reconsider these biased and unproductive practices.<br /> +They will only end up harming its customers. As for ODF, things are going to become very interesting, I think. This time, there is a real chance the market will not let Microsoft fool it again.<br /> +And what the market will ask for will be pure, unbiased ODF that can interact with various ODF-capable systems. This time, there will be no excuse.</p> +<p class="akst_link"><a href="http://standardsandfreedom.net/?p=124&akst_action=share-this"; title="E-mail this, post to del.icio.us, etc." id="akst_link_124" class="akst_share_link" rel="nofollow">Share This</a> +</p></p> +<p> +<em><a href="http://standardsandfreedom.net/index.php/2009/05/06/odf-with-no-excuse/";>by Charles at May 06, 2009 05:12 PM GMT</a></em> +</p> +<br /> +<hr /> +<br /> +<h3> <a href="http://ooomarketing.blogspot.com/"; title="OpenOffice.org Marketing Blog"> OOo Marketeers</a> : <a href="http://ooomarketing.blogspot.com/2009/05/openofficeorg-linuxtag-partner-booth.html";> @@ -490,20 +519,6 @@ <br /> <hr /> <br /> -<h3> -<a href="http://ooomarketing.blogspot.com/"; title="OpenOffice.org Marketing Blog"> -OOo Marketeers</a> : -<a href="http://ooomarketing.blogspot.com/2009/04/openofficeorg-special-at-heise-german.html";> -OpenOffice.org Special at Heise (German)</a> -</h3> -<p> -German publisher Heise just put online its OpenOffice.org Special, talking about extensions: <a href="http://www.heise.de/software/download/special/openoffice_lernt_dazu/57_1";>http://www.heise.de/software/download/special/openoffice_lernt_dazu/57_1</a><div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width="1" height="1" src="http://res1.blogblog.com/tracker/4887643299605448632-2059215242010135251?l=ooomarketing.blogspot.com"; /></div></p> -<p> -<em><a href="http://ooomarketing.blogspot.com/2009/04/openofficeorg-special-at-heise-german.html";>by floeff ([email protected]) at April 18, 2009 05:58 PM BST</a></em> -</p> -<br /> -<hr /> -<br /> <a id="disclaimer" name="disclaimer"></a> <p><em>Disclaimer: all views expressed on this page are those of the individual contributors, and may not reflect the views of the File [changed]: opml.xml Url: http://marketing.openoffice.org/source/browse/marketing/www/planet/opml.xml?r1=1.1836&r2=1.1837 Delta lines: +1 -1 ------------------- --- opml.xml 2009-05-06 17:00:59+0000 1.1836 +++ opml.xml 2009-05-06 23:01:02+0000 1.1837 @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ <opml version="1.1"> <head> <title>Marketing Planet</title> - <dateModified>Wed, 06 May 2009 17:00:37 +0000</dateModified> + <dateModified>Wed, 06 May 2009 23:00:38 +0000</dateModified> <ownerName>Marketing Project</ownerName> <ownerEmail>[email protected]</ownerEmail> </head> File [changed]: rss10.xml Url: http://marketing.openoffice.org/source/browse/marketing/www/planet/rss10.xml?r1=1.722&r2=1.723 Delta lines: +22 -8 -------------------- --- rss10.xml 2009-05-06 17:01:00+0000 1.722 +++ rss10.xml 2009-05-06 23:01:02+0000 1.723 @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ <items> <rdf:Seq> + <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://standardsandfreedom.net/index.php/2009/05/06/odf-with-no-excuse/"; /> <rdf:li rdf:resource="tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4887643299605448632.post-529693685334375424" /> <rdf:li rdf:resource="tag:google.com,2005:reader/item/e1ec9247227c65e5" /> <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mealldubh.org/?p=687"; /> @@ -32,11 +33,31 @@ <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mealldubh.org/?p=680"; /> <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.solidoffice.com/?p=1116"; /> <rdf:li rdf:resource="tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4887643299605448632.post-2296602663729091189" /> - <rdf:li rdf:resource="tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4887643299605448632.post-2059215242010135251" /> </rdf:Seq> </items> </channel> +<item rdf:about="http://standardsandfreedom.net/index.php/2009/05/06/odf-with-no-excuse/";> + <title>Charles Schulz: ODF with no excuse</title> + <link>http://standardsandfreedom.net/index.php/2009/05/06/odf-with-no-excuse/</link> + <content:encoded><p> Reports start to appear in the press about the ODF support quality enabled by the Service Pack 2 inside Microsoft Office 2007. I could say that I&#8217;m not surprised,<br /> +but I somewhat had also expected the contrary. Unfortunately it seems we have here a poor implementation of ODF. If further reports confirm it (and I have no serious doubt they will),<br /> +we will have the case of a monopolistic vendor messing up its own implementation of an open standard and have no viable excuse for doing so.</p> +<p>If we are to believe several reports who all link to <a href="http://www.robweir.com/blog/2009/05/update-on-odf-spreadsheet.html">Rob Weir&#8217;s own thorough review</a> ,<br /> +Microsoft has not only done a poor job implementing ODF, it has also ended up into a quite unique <em>endless loop phenomenon</em> . What this basically means is that in some instances<br /> +ODF documents created by Microsoft Office will only be readable and editable in&#8230; Microsoft Office. How was this possible? Apparently when you want to mess up something, you always find ways to do so.</p> +<p>It would be very tempting to assume that if such a loop, as I call it, was possible, then the real technical flaw has been lying inside the standard&#8217;s specification for quite some time. And you know what?<br /> +This is obviously the case&#8230; otherwise it would not have been possible, or else, MS does not produce conforming ODF documents. But the worst part may not even be there.</p> +<p>What we should perhaps realize today, is that one company charged of monopolistic abuse, after having imposed its own office document standard at the ISO (this one being itself under investigation),<br /> +is now trying to break the existing interoperability with the ODF standard. It would not be the first time Microsoft would have had this strategy. But it just reveals how little has changed inside this company.</p> +<p>The intended effect, or should I say the risk, is that given a market share gained and maintained mostly by monopolistic practices and network effects, Microsoft Officer will lock its users in its very own,<br /> +incompatible and uninteroperable version of ODF. This is called <em>format filibustering</em> and it is an art Redmond has mastered over the years. I do urge Microsoft to reconsider these biased and unproductive practices.<br /> +They will only end up harming its customers. As for ODF, things are going to become very interesting, I think. This time, there is a real chance the market will not let Microsoft fool it again.<br /> +And what the market will ask for will be pure, unbiased ODF that can interact with various ODF-capable systems. This time, there will be no excuse.</p> +<p class="akst_link"><a href="http://standardsandfreedom.net/?p=124&akst_action=share-this" title="E-mail this, post to del.icio.us, etc." id="akst_link_124" class="akst_share_link" rel="nofollow">Share This</a> +</p></content:encoded> + <dc:date>2009-05-06T17:12:09+00:00</dc:date> +</item> <item rdf:about="tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4887643299605448632.post-529693685334375424"> <title>OOo Marketeers: OpenOffice.org LinuxTag partner booth</title> <link>http://ooomarketing.blogspot.com/2009/05/openofficeorg-linuxtag-partner-booth.html</link> @@ -334,12 +355,5 @@ <dc:date>2009-04-18T20:11:21+00:00</dc:date> <dc:creator>floeff</dc:creator> </item> -<item rdf:about="tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4887643299605448632.post-2059215242010135251"> - <title>OOo Marketeers: OpenOffice.org Special at Heise (German)</title> - <link>http://ooomarketing.blogspot.com/2009/04/openofficeorg-special-at-heise-german.html</link> - <content:encoded>German publisher Heise just put online its OpenOffice.org Special, talking about extensions: <a href="http://www.heise.de/software/download/special/openoffice_lernt_dazu/57_1">http://www.heise.de/software/download/special/openoffice_lernt_dazu/57_1</a><div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width="1" height="1" src="http://res1.blogblog.com/tracker/4887643299605448632-2059215242010135251?l=ooomarketing.blogspot.com" /></div></content:encoded> - <dc:date>2009-04-18T17:58:54+00:00</dc:date> - <dc:creator>floeff</dc:creator> -</item> </rdf:RDF> File [changed]: rss20.xml Url: http://marketing.openoffice.org/source/browse/marketing/www/planet/rss20.xml?r1=1.722&r2=1.723 Delta lines: +22 -8 -------------------- --- rss20.xml 2009-05-06 17:01:00+0000 1.722 +++ rss20.xml 2009-05-06 23:01:02+0000 1.723 @@ -8,6 +8,28 @@ <description>Marketing Planet - http://marketing.openoffice.org/planet/</description> <item> + <title>Charles Schulz: ODF with no excuse</title> + <guid>http://standardsandfreedom.net/index.php/2009/05/06/odf-with-no-excuse/</guid> + <link>http://standardsandfreedom.net/index.php/2009/05/06/odf-with-no-excuse/</link> + <description><p> Reports start to appear in the press about the ODF support quality enabled by the Service Pack 2 inside Microsoft Office 2007. I could say that I&#8217;m not surprised,<br /> +but I somewhat had also expected the contrary. Unfortunately it seems we have here a poor implementation of ODF. If further reports confirm it (and I have no serious doubt they will),<br /> +we will have the case of a monopolistic vendor messing up its own implementation of an open standard and have no viable excuse for doing so.</p> +<p>If we are to believe several reports who all link to <a href="http://www.robweir.com/blog/2009/05/update-on-odf-spreadsheet.html">Rob Weir&#8217;s own thorough review</a> ,<br /> +Microsoft has not only done a poor job implementing ODF, it has also ended up into a quite unique <em>endless loop phenomenon</em> . What this basically means is that in some instances<br /> +ODF documents created by Microsoft Office will only be readable and editable in&#8230; Microsoft Office. How was this possible? Apparently when you want to mess up something, you always find ways to do so.</p> +<p>It would be very tempting to assume that if such a loop, as I call it, was possible, then the real technical flaw has been lying inside the standard&#8217;s specification for quite some time. And you know what?<br /> +This is obviously the case&#8230; otherwise it would not have been possible, or else, MS does not produce conforming ODF documents. But the worst part may not even be there.</p> +<p>What we should perhaps realize today, is that one company charged of monopolistic abuse, after having imposed its own office document standard at the ISO (this one being itself under investigation),<br /> +is now trying to break the existing interoperability with the ODF standard. It would not be the first time Microsoft would have had this strategy. But it just reveals how little has changed inside this company.</p> +<p>The intended effect, or should I say the risk, is that given a market share gained and maintained mostly by monopolistic practices and network effects, Microsoft Officer will lock its users in its very own,<br /> +incompatible and uninteroperable version of ODF. This is called <em>format filibustering</em> and it is an art Redmond has mastered over the years. I do urge Microsoft to reconsider these biased and unproductive practices.<br /> +They will only end up harming its customers. As for ODF, things are going to become very interesting, I think. This time, there is a real chance the market will not let Microsoft fool it again.<br /> +And what the market will ask for will be pure, unbiased ODF that can interact with various ODF-capable systems. This time, there will be no excuse.</p> +<p class="akst_link"><a href="http://standardsandfreedom.net/?p=124&akst_action=share-this" title="E-mail this, post to del.icio.us, etc." id="akst_link_124" class="akst_share_link" rel="nofollow">Share This</a> +</p></description> + <pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 17:12:09 +0000</pubDate> +</item> +<item> <title>OOo Marketeers: OpenOffice.org LinuxTag partner booth</title> <guid>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4887643299605448632.post-529693685334375424</guid> <link>http://ooomarketing.blogspot.com/2009/05/openofficeorg-linuxtag-partner-booth.html</link> @@ -319,14 +341,6 @@ <pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 20:11:21 +0000</pubDate> <author>[email protected] (floeff)</author> </item> -<item> - <title>OOo Marketeers: OpenOffice.org Special at Heise (German)</title> - <guid>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4887643299605448632.post-2059215242010135251</guid> - <link>http://ooomarketing.blogspot.com/2009/04/openofficeorg-special-at-heise-german.html</link> - <description>German publisher Heise just put online its OpenOffice.org Special, talking about extensions: <a href="http://www.heise.de/software/download/special/openoffice_lernt_dazu/57_1">http://www.heise.de/software/download/special/openoffice_lernt_dazu/57_1</a><div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width="1" height="1" src="http://res1.blogblog.com/tracker/4887643299605448632-2059215242010135251?l=ooomarketing.blogspot.com" /></div></description> - <pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 17:58:54 +0000</pubDate> - <author>[email protected] (floeff)</author> -</item> </channel> </rss> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
