User: jpmcc   
Date: 2009-05-26 11:00:42+0000
Modified:
   marketing/www/planet/atom.xml
   marketing/www/planet/index.html
   marketing/www/planet/opml.xml
   marketing/www/planet/rss10.xml
   marketing/www/planet/rss20.xml

Log:
 Planet run at Tue May 26 12:00:13 BST 2009

File Changes:

Directory: /marketing/www/planet/
=================================

File [changed]: atom.xml
Url: 
http://marketing.openoffice.org/source/browse/marketing/www/planet/atom.xml?r1=1.1916&r2=1.1917
Delta lines:  +54 -47
---------------------
--- atom.xml    2009-05-26 05:00:36+0000        1.1916
+++ atom.xml    2009-05-26 11:00:36+0000        1.1917
@@ -5,10 +5,59 @@
        <link rel="self" 
href="http://marketing.openoffice.org/planet/atom.xml"/>
        <link href="http://marketing.openoffice.org/planet/"/>
        <id>http://marketing.openoffice.org/planet/atom.xml</id>
-       <updated>2009-05-26T05:00:28+00:00</updated>
+       <updated>2009-05-26T11:00:26+00:00</updated>
        <generator uri="http://www.planetplanet.org/";>Planet/2.0 
+http://www.planetplanet.org</generator>
 
        <entry>
+               <title type="html">Ideation and what's next in the Renaissance 
Project</title>
+               <link 
href="http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS/entry/ideation_and_what_s_next"/>
+               <id>tag:google.com,2005:reader/item/d1a38e6f8a4c00f9</id>
+               <updated>2009-05-25T19:56:33+00:00</updated>
+               <content type="html">&lt;p&gt; So, the collection of design 
proposals and their refinement is over. Thanks to everyone who has participated 
and spent nights to finish either in time or a bit later. Liz will post a 
detailed summary about that part of the current phase later this week. With 
this post, I'd like to share my experience with using some ideation methods I 
learned in Berlin for UI brainstorming, and to give a short preview of what is 
about to happen in the Renaissance Project and for what reason.&lt;br 
/&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But first, let’s check what we have planned and what was in 
the project road map. Here is how phase two of project Renaissance was 
initially set up:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;1.    Incorporate research 
data&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;    a.    Analyze quantitative/qualitative data 
to understand usage/users&lt;br /&gt;    b.    Create personas based on 
the analysis&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;2.    Focus on the personas' 
characteristics&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;    a.    Create scenarios for key 
functionalities&lt;br /&gt;    b.    Define information architecture from 
the scenarios&lt;br /&gt;    c.    Flow charts&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;3.   
 Generate design ideas using the scenarios&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;    a.   
 Paper prototypes&lt;br /&gt;    b.    Clickable slides&lt;br 
/&gt;    c.    Dynamic prototypes&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I am still 
convinced that our initial plan was quite well elaborated and promising. 
However, looking at that now I must admit that we were not able to achieve many 
of the tasks that are listed here. In retrospective, we jumped right from 1a to 
3b, which is of course possible but it makes many other design activities a lot 
harder at a later stage. Due to time and resources constraints, we spent only 
little time on understanding our quantitative data and almost no time on 
qualitative research. As a consequence, we were only partially able to generate 
findings that support design decisions. But still, please don’t get me wrong, 
what we got from our research is a lot more and better than relying on pure 
subjective assumptions. And that is a good thing and a good start.&lt;br 
/&gt;&lt;br /&gt;However, usually you would want to start with a redesign 
strategy that defines your redesign scope and therefore guides any of your 
design research activities such as what research questions you’d like to have 
answers to. I would say that we were quite good at this part. But as stated 
above, we were not able to answer a few of our important research questions 
such as “What is important to our users and what are their goals?”, “How 
do they feel using our product?” or “How would they like to feel using 
it?”.  In practice, these are important insights that guide your design work 
and decisions. Insufficient answers to these questions make evaluation of 
designs a lot harder. That is actually related to our upcoming 
activities.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;So, what is the objective of ideation?  As 
described in one of my earlier blog posts, ideation helps to generate a lot of 
unconstrained design ideas. By a lot I mean masses, as many as possible. This 
process is all about the quantity of ideas, not the quality or richness in 
detail.  Quantity is important since you never know where a bright idea might 
show up.  So, learn to embrace the diversity. When you think that you have 
enough crazy ideas, start getting some order. Sort them, check for overlapping 
ideas, define groups and label them. In sum, put similar things together and 
give them a name. Then take your design principles that you’ve defined with 
the help of your research findings, and start refining all the crazy ideas 
accordingly. At the end, you should have a nice set of designs that you want to 
see in action in order to verify them with real users. That is basically where 
we’re heading next, refinement and prototyping.&lt;/p&gt; 
+  &lt;p align=&quot;center&quot;&gt;&lt;a 
href=&quot;http://picasaweb.google.de/lh/photo/GsK-H2GgDckPImDvkaJ6Sw?feat=embedwebsite&quot;&gt;&lt;img
 
src=&quot;http://lh5.ggpht.com/_1V3VpP3YHN0/ShrsxLUS46I/AAAAAAAABKs/Worq-1_xaaM/s400/IMG_1086.JPG&quot;
 /&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt; 
+  &lt;p&gt;To check how that approach works in our context and what we can 
actually get out of it, I did a small ideation “experiment” for the last 
two weeks. The first week I spent on drawing sketches like a maniac by myself. 
However, through our proposal collection phase, I was too restricted in my 
head. It is actually hard to let things go to which one is so used to. Last 
week, we repeated the ideation method with a couple of colleagues with various 
backgrounds. We had Dev, QA, Tooling, and UX onboard. In two groups, we started 
brainstorming about how we would want the ideal Impress to be. For three 
minutes, everyone wrote adjectives attributed to the “imaginary” Impress on 
sticky notes and then we put them on the wall, and started sorting and 
organizing them.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Amazingly a lot of the adjectives 
overlapped. At the end, we were able to define two main groups that had a lot 
more adjectives than others. The first group could be described as the one 
concerned with usability while the second group was all about positive 
experiences, emotions and aesthetics of the product. That happed in both groups 
by the way. In sum, everyone in Dev, QA, Tooling, and UX wanted the future 
Impress to be easy to use and “pretty”! These are quite basic needs, 
aren’t they? And all from people with totally different 
backgrounds.&lt;/p&gt;</content>
+               <author>
+                       <name>Andreas Bartel</name>
+                       <uri></uri>
+               </author>
+               <source>
+                       <title type="html">jpmcc's shared items in Google 
Reader</title>
+                       <link rel="self" 
href="http://www.google.co.uk/reader/public/atom/user/06203502505240591501/state/com.google/broadcast"/>
+                       
<id>tag:google.com,2005:reader/user/06203502505240591501/state/com.google/broadcast</id>
+                       <updated>2009-05-26T11:00:18+00:00</updated>
+               </source>
+       </entry>
+
+       <entry>
+               <title type="html">OpenOffice.org User Survey 2009 Data 
Available</title>
+               <link 
href="http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS/entry/openoffice_org_user_survey_2009"/>
+               <id>tag:google.com,2005:reader/item/78154ce7426b0c6a</id>
+               <updated>2009-05-25T19:13:27+00:00</updated>
+               <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;
+The data collected by the current OOo &lt;a title=&quot;OOo Survey 2009&quot; 
href=&quot;http://surveys.services.openoffice.org/surveys/index.php?sid=69531&quot;&gt;User
 Survey 2009&lt;/a&gt; has been &lt;a title=&quot;OOo Wiki&quot; 
href=&quot;http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Renaissance:Phase_1:OOoUser_Survey2009&quot;&gt;published
 at the OOo wiki&lt;/a&gt;.
+
+The data is based on more than 125K submissions by our users within the last 
three months.
+
+Unfortunately the questions are in German due to a limitation of the survey 
tooling (we have started this new survey with the 'wrong' language this 
time;-). Please use the key of a question to grab for the English text shown on 
the right side inside the spreadsheet. Sorry for the inconvenience.&lt;/p&gt; 
+  &lt;p&gt;
+
+Best Regards,
+
+&lt;/p&gt; 
+  &lt;p&gt;Frank&lt;/p&gt;</content>
+               <author>
+                       <name>frankl</name>
+                       <uri></uri>
+               </author>
+               <source>
+                       <title type="html">jpmcc's shared items in Google 
Reader</title>
+                       <link rel="self" 
href="http://www.google.co.uk/reader/public/atom/user/06203502505240591501/state/com.google/broadcast"/>
+                       
<id>tag:google.com,2005:reader/user/06203502505240591501/state/com.google/broadcast</id>
+                       <updated>2009-05-26T11:00:18+00:00</updated>
+               </source>
+       </entry>
+
+       <entry>
                <title type="html">Value : Notes on Foss 2009-05-25</title>
                <link 
href="http://ooo-speak.blogspot.com/2009/05/value-notes-on-foss-2009-05-25.html"/>
                
<id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4649039904546083564.post-6589002475932314814</id>
@@ -220,7 +269,7 @@
                        <title type="html">jpmcc's shared items in Google 
Reader</title>
                        <link rel="self" 
href="http://www.google.co.uk/reader/public/atom/user/06203502505240591501/state/com.google/broadcast"/>
                        
<id>tag:google.com,2005:reader/user/06203502505240591501/state/com.google/broadcast</id>
-                       <updated>2009-05-26T05:00:16+00:00</updated>
+                       <updated>2009-05-26T11:00:18+00:00</updated>
                </source>
        </entry>
 
@@ -270,7 +319,7 @@
                        <title type="html">jpmcc's shared items in Google 
Reader</title>
                        <link rel="self" 
href="http://www.google.co.uk/reader/public/atom/user/06203502505240591501/state/com.google/broadcast"/>
                        
<id>tag:google.com,2005:reader/user/06203502505240591501/state/com.google/broadcast</id>
-                       <updated>2009-05-26T05:00:16+00:00</updated>
+                       <updated>2009-05-26T11:00:18+00:00</updated>
                </source>
        </entry>
 
@@ -406,7 +455,7 @@
                        <title type="html">jpmcc's shared items in Google 
Reader</title>
                        <link rel="self" 
href="http://www.google.co.uk/reader/public/atom/user/06203502505240591501/state/com.google/broadcast"/>
                        
<id>tag:google.com,2005:reader/user/06203502505240591501/state/com.google/broadcast</id>
-                       <updated>2009-05-26T05:00:16+00:00</updated>
+                       <updated>2009-05-26T11:00:18+00:00</updated>
                </source>
        </entry>
 
@@ -441,49 +490,7 @@
                        <title type="html">jpmcc's shared items in Google 
Reader</title>
                        <link rel="self" 
href="http://www.google.co.uk/reader/public/atom/user/06203502505240591501/state/com.google/broadcast"/>
                        
<id>tag:google.com,2005:reader/user/06203502505240591501/state/com.google/broadcast</id>
-                       <updated>2009-05-26T05:00:16+00:00</updated>
-               </source>
-       </entry>
-
-       <entry xml:lang="en">
-               <title type="html">After the launch was over</title>
-               <link 
href="http://www.mealldubh.org/index.php/2009/05/12/after-the-launch-was-over/"/>
-               <id>http://www.mealldubh.org/?p=689</id>
-               <updated>2009-05-12T19:06:15+00:00</updated>
-               <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;So, &lt;a 
href=&quot;http://www.openoffice.org/product/&quot;&gt;OpenOffice.org 
3.1&lt;/a&gt; with all its &lt;a 
href=&quot;http://www.openoffice.org/dev_docs/features/3.1/index.html&quot;&gt;lovely
 new features&lt;/a&gt; is well and truly launched, with the &lt;a 
href=&quot;http://www.prweb.com/releases/OOo/31/prweb2388264.htm&quot;&gt;official
 announcement&lt;/a&gt; last Thursday. I&amp;#8217;ve reset the download 
counter on the &lt;a 
href=&quot;http://marketing.openoffice.org/planet/&quot;&gt;Marketing 
Planet&lt;/a&gt; - as you can see from the &lt;a 
href=&quot;http://marketing.openoffice.org/marketing_bouncer.html&quot;&gt;detailed
 stats page&lt;/a&gt;, we were just a smidgeon short of 60 million downloads 
for OpenOffice.org 3.0.&lt;/p&gt;
-&lt;p&gt;The first reviews are also starting to appear in the press - 
it&amp;#8217;s worth keeping an eye on the &lt;a 
href=&quot;http://www.openoffice.org/product/reviews.html&quot;&gt;reviews 
page&lt;/a&gt; for a summary - we don&amp;#8217;t just list the good ones 
&lt;img 
src=&quot;http://www.mealldubh.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif&quot;
 alt=&quot;;)&quot; class=&quot;wp-smiley&quot; /&gt; &lt;/p&gt;</content>
-               <author>
-                       <name>John McCreesh</name>
-                       <uri>http://www.mealldubh.org</uri>
-               </author>
-               <source>
-                       <title type="html">Meall Dubh » OpenOffice.org</title>
-                       <subtitle type="html">a view from a dark hill</subtitle>
-                       <link rel="self" 
href="http://www.mealldubh.org/index.php/category/open-source/openofficeorg/feed/"/>
-                       
<id>http://www.mealldubh.org/index.php/category/open-source/openofficeorg/feed/</id>
-                       <updated>2009-05-23T11:00:15+00:00</updated>
-               </source>
-       </entry>
-
-       <entry xml:lang="en">
-               <title type="html">TestFreaks’ 50 OpenOffice Tips</title>
-               <link href="http://www.solidoffice.com/archives/1143"/>
-               <id>http://www.solidoffice.com/?p=1143</id>
-               <updated>2009-05-12T02:09:55+00:00</updated>
-               <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;The &lt;a 
href=&quot;http://www.testfreaks.com/blog/&quot;&gt;TestFreaks Blog&lt;/a&gt; 
publishes &lt;a 
href=&quot;http://www.testfreaks.com/blog/information/mastering-open-office-50-useful-tips-to-get-you-started/&quot;&gt;Mastering
 OpenOffice: 50 Useful Tips to Get You Started&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;/p&gt;
-&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a 
href=&quot;http://www.openoffice.org/&quot;&gt;OpenOffice&lt;/a&gt; is the 
unsung software for personal usage. It offers two very convincing reasons to 
download: 1.) It’s free. And 2.) It comes with 24/7 online 
help.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
-&lt;p&gt;Yes, both true, but there is more.&lt;/p&gt;
-&lt;p&gt;The article continues, with a collection of progressively more 
advanced tips for new users of OOo. It covers wizards for installing new 
dictionaries and fonts, and the Math component is discussed, as well as Calc, 
although very briefly. Of course it covers Writer, Impress and Draw as well, 
and one final tip on Base.&lt;/p&gt;</content>
-               <author>
-                       <name>Benjamin Horst</name>
-                       <uri>http://www.solidoffice.com</uri>
-               </author>
-               <source>
-                       <title type="html">SolidOffice » OpenOffice.org</title>
-                       <subtitle type="html">Home of The Tiny Guide to 
OpenOffice.org</subtitle>
-                       <link rel="self" 
href="http://www.solidoffice.com/archives/category/openofficeorg/feed"/>
-                       
<id>http://www.solidoffice.com/archives/category/openofficeorg/feed</id>
-                       <updated>2009-05-26T05:00:28+00:00</updated>
+                       <updated>2009-05-26T11:00:18+00:00</updated>
                </source>
        </entry>
 

File [changed]: index.html
Url: 
http://marketing.openoffice.org/source/browse/marketing/www/planet/index.html?r1=1.1923&r2=1.1924
Delta lines:  +42 -34
---------------------
--- index.html  2009-05-26 05:00:37+0000        1.1923
+++ index.html  2009-05-26 11:00:37+0000        1.1924
@@ -36,10 +36,51 @@
 <a href="rss20.xml"><img src="rss2.gif" alt="Link to RSS 2 feed" /></a>
 </div>
 
-<p><em>Bloggings on marketing topics by project members - see <a 
href="#disclaimer">disclaimer</a>.<br />Last updated: May 26, 2009 05:00 AM 
GMT</em></p>
+<p><em>Bloggings on marketing topics by project members - see <a 
href="#disclaimer">disclaimer</a>.<br />Last updated: May 26, 2009 11:00 AM 
GMT</em></p>
 
 <h2>May 25, 2009</h2>
 <h3>
+<a href="" title="jpmcc's shared items in Google Reader">
+GullFOSS</a>&nbsp;:&nbsp;
+<a href="http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS/entry/ideation_and_what_s_next";>
+Ideation and what's next in the Renaissance Project</a>
+</h3>
+<p>
+<p> So, the collection of design proposals and their refinement is over. 
Thanks to everyone who has participated and spent nights to finish either in 
time or a bit later. Liz will post a detailed summary about that part of the 
current phase later this week. With this post, I'd like to share my experience 
with using some ideation methods I learned in Berlin for UI brainstorming, and 
to give a short preview of what is about to happen in the Renaissance Project 
and for what reason.<br /><br />But first, let’s check what we have planned 
and what was in the project road map. Here is how phase two of project 
Renaissance was initially set up:<br /><br /><b>1.    Incorporate research 
data</b><br />    a.    Analyze quantitative/qualitative data to 
understand usage/users<br />    b.    Create personas based on the 
analysis<br /><b>2.    Focus on the personas' characteristics</b><br 
/>    a.    Create scenarios for key functionalities<br />    b.   
 Define information architecture from the scenarios<br />    c.    Flow 
charts<br /><b>3.    Generate design ideas using the scenarios</b><br 
/>    a.    Paper prototypes<br />    b.    Clickable slides<br 
/>    c.    Dynamic prototypes<br /><br />I am still convinced that our 
initial plan was quite well elaborated and promising. However, looking at that 
now I must admit that we were not able to achieve many of the tasks that are 
listed here. In retrospective, we jumped right from 1a to 3b, which is of 
course possible but it makes many other design activities a lot harder at a 
later stage. Due to time and resources constraints, we spent only little time 
on understanding our quantitative data and almost no time on qualitative 
research. As a consequence, we were only partially able to generate findings 
that support design decisions. But still, please don’t get me wrong, what we 
got from our research is a lot more and better than relying on pure subjective 
assumptions. And that is a good thing and a good start.<br /><br />However, 
usually you would want to start with a redesign strategy that defines your 
redesign scope and therefore guides any of your design research activities such 
as what research questions you’d like to have answers to. I would say that we 
were quite good at this part. But as stated above, we were not able to answer a 
few of our important research questions such as “What is important to our 
users and what are their goals?”, “How do they feel using our product?” 
or “How would they like to feel using it?”.  In practice, these are 
important insights that guide your design work and decisions. Insufficient 
answers to these questions make evaluation of designs a lot harder. That is 
actually related to our upcoming activities.<br /><br />So, what is the 
objective of ideation?  As described in one of my earlier blog posts, ideation 
helps to generate a lot of unconstrained design ideas. By a lot I mean masses, 
as many as possible. This process is all about the quantity of ideas, not the 
quality or richness in detail.  Quantity is important since you never know 
where a bright idea might show up.  So, learn to embrace the diversity. When 
you think that you have enough crazy ideas, start getting some order. Sort 
them, check for overlapping ideas, define groups and label them. In sum, put 
similar things together and give them a name. Then take your design principles 
that you’ve defined with the help of your research findings, and start 
refining all the crazy ideas accordingly. At the end, you should have a nice 
set of designs that you want to see in action in order to verify them with real 
users. That is basically where we’re heading next, refinement and 
prototyping.</p> 
+  <p align="center"><a 
href="http://picasaweb.google.de/lh/photo/GsK-H2GgDckPImDvkaJ6Sw?feat=embedwebsite";><img
 
src="http://lh5.ggpht.com/_1V3VpP3YHN0/ShrsxLUS46I/AAAAAAAABKs/Worq-1_xaaM/s400/IMG_1086.JPG";
 /></a> <br /></p> 
+  <p>To check how that approach works in our context and what we can actually 
get out of it, I did a small ideation “experiment” for the last two weeks. 
The first week I spent on drawing sketches like a maniac by myself. However, 
through our proposal collection phase, I was too restricted in my head. It is 
actually hard to let things go to which one is so used to. Last week, we 
repeated the ideation method with a couple of colleagues with various 
backgrounds. We had Dev, QA, Tooling, and UX onboard. In two groups, we started 
brainstorming about how we would want the ideal Impress to be. For three 
minutes, everyone wrote adjectives attributed to the “imaginary” Impress on 
sticky notes and then we put them on the wall, and started sorting and 
organizing them.<br /><br />Amazingly a lot of the adjectives overlapped. At 
the end, we were able to define two main groups that had a lot more adjectives 
than others. The first group could be described as the one concerned with 
usability while the second group was all about positive experiences, emotions 
and aesthetics of the product. That happed in both groups by the way. In sum, 
everyone in Dev, QA, Tooling, and UX wanted the future Impress to be easy to 
use and “pretty”! These are quite basic needs, aren’t they? And all from 
people with totally different backgrounds.</p></p>
+<p>
+<em><a href="http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS/entry/ideation_and_what_s_next";>by 
Andreas Bartel at May 25, 2009 07:56 PM GMT</a></em>
+</p>
+<br />
+<hr />
+<br />
+<h3>
+<a href="" title="jpmcc's shared items in Google Reader">
+GullFOSS</a>&nbsp;:&nbsp;
+<a href="http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS/entry/openoffice_org_user_survey_2009";>
+OpenOffice.org User Survey 2009 Data Available</a>
+</h3>
+<p>
+<p>
+The data collected by the current OOo <a title="OOo Survey 2009" 
href="http://surveys.services.openoffice.org/surveys/index.php?sid=69531";>User 
Survey 2009</a> has been <a title="OOo Wiki" 
href="http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Renaissance:Phase_1:OOoUser_Survey2009";>published
 at the OOo wiki</a>.
+
+The data is based on more than 125K submissions by our users within the last 
three months.
+
+Unfortunately the questions are in German due to a limitation of the survey 
tooling (we have started this new survey with the 'wrong' language this 
time;-). Please use the key of a question to grab for the English text shown on 
the right side inside the spreadsheet. Sorry for the inconvenience.</p> 
+  <p>
+
+Best Regards,
+
+</p> 
+  <p>Frank</p></p>
+<p>
+<em><a 
href="http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS/entry/openoffice_org_user_survey_2009";>by 
frankl at May 25, 2009 07:13 PM GMT</a></em>
+</p>
+<br />
+<hr />
+<br />
+<h3>
 <a href="http://ooo-speak.blogspot.com/"; title="ooo-speak">
 Louis Suarez-Potts</a>&nbsp;:&nbsp;
 <a 
href="http://ooo-speak.blogspot.com/2009/05/value-notes-on-foss-2009-05-25.html";>
@@ -392,39 +433,6 @@
 <br />
 <hr />
 <br />
-<h2>May 12, 2009</h2>
-<h3>
-<a href="http://www.mealldubh.org"; title="Meall Dubh » OpenOffice.org">
-John McCreesh</a>&nbsp;:&nbsp;
-<a 
href="http://www.mealldubh.org/index.php/2009/05/12/after-the-launch-was-over/";>
-After the launch was over</a>
-</h3>
-<p>
-<p>So, <a href="http://www.openoffice.org/product/";>OpenOffice.org 3.1</a> 
with all its <a 
href="http://www.openoffice.org/dev_docs/features/3.1/index.html";>lovely new 
features</a> is well and truly launched, with the <a 
href="http://www.prweb.com/releases/OOo/31/prweb2388264.htm";>official 
announcement</a> last Thursday. I&#8217;ve reset the download counter on the <a 
href="http://marketing.openoffice.org/planet/";>Marketing Planet</a> - as you 
can see from the <a 
href="http://marketing.openoffice.org/marketing_bouncer.html";>detailed stats 
page</a>, we were just a smidgeon short of 60 million downloads for 
OpenOffice.org 3.0.</p>
-<p>The first reviews are also starting to appear in the press - it&#8217;s 
worth keeping an eye on the <a 
href="http://www.openoffice.org/product/reviews.html";>reviews page</a> for a 
summary - we don&#8217;t just list the good ones <img 
src="http://www.mealldubh.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif"; 
alt=";)" class="wp-smiley" /> </p></p>
-<p>
-<em><a 
href="http://www.mealldubh.org/index.php/2009/05/12/after-the-launch-was-over/";>by
 John at May 12, 2009 07:06 PM GMT</a></em>
-</p>
-<br />
-<hr />
-<br />
-<h3>
-<a href="http://www.solidoffice.com"; title="SolidOffice » OpenOffice.org">
-Benjamin Horst</a>&nbsp;:&nbsp;
-<a href="http://www.solidoffice.com/archives/1143";>
-TestFreaks’ 50 OpenOffice Tips</a>
-</h3>
-<p>
-<p>The <a href="http://www.testfreaks.com/blog/";>TestFreaks Blog</a> publishes 
<a 
href="http://www.testfreaks.com/blog/information/mastering-open-office-50-useful-tips-to-get-you-started/";>Mastering
 OpenOffice: 50 Useful Tips to Get You Started</a>:</p>
-<blockquote><p><a href="http://www.openoffice.org/";>OpenOffice</a> is the 
unsung software for personal usage. It offers two very convincing reasons to 
download: 1.) It’s free. And 2.) It comes with 24/7 online 
help.</p></blockquote>
-<p>Yes, both true, but there is more.</p>
-<p>The article continues, with a collection of progressively more advanced 
tips for new users of OOo. It covers wizards for installing new dictionaries 
and fonts, and the Math component is discussed, as well as Calc, although very 
briefly. Of course it covers Writer, Impress and Draw as well, and one final 
tip on Base.</p></p>
-<p>
-<em><a href="http://www.solidoffice.com/archives/1143";>by Benjamin Horst at 
May 12, 2009 02:09 AM GMT</a></em>
-</p>
-<br />
-<hr />
-<br />
 <a id="disclaimer" name="disclaimer"></a>
 <p><em>Disclaimer: all views expressed on this page are those 
 of the individual contributors, and may not reflect the views of the 

File [changed]: opml.xml
Url: 
http://marketing.openoffice.org/source/browse/marketing/www/planet/opml.xml?r1=1.1916&r2=1.1917
Delta lines:  +1 -1
-------------------
--- opml.xml    2009-05-26 05:00:37+0000        1.1916
+++ opml.xml    2009-05-26 11:00:37+0000        1.1917
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 <opml version="1.1">
        <head>
                <title>Marketing Planet</title>
-               <dateModified>Tue, 26 May 2009 05:00:28 +0000</dateModified>
+               <dateModified>Tue, 26 May 2009 11:00:27 +0000</dateModified>
                <ownerName>Marketing Project</ownerName>
                <ownerEmail>[email protected]</ownerEmail>
        </head>

File [changed]: rss10.xml
Url: 
http://marketing.openoffice.org/source/browse/marketing/www/planet/rss10.xml?r1=1.750&r2=1.751
Delta lines:  +29 -18
---------------------
--- rss10.xml   2009-05-25 23:00:50+0000        1.750
+++ rss10.xml   2009-05-26 11:00:37+0000        1.751
@@ -13,6 +13,8 @@
 
        <items>
                <rdf:Seq>
+                       <rdf:li 
rdf:resource="tag:google.com,2005:reader/item/d1a38e6f8a4c00f9" />
+                       <rdf:li 
rdf:resource="tag:google.com,2005:reader/item/78154ce7426b0c6a" />
                        <rdf:li 
rdf:resource="tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4649039904546083564.post-6589002475932314814"
 />
                        <rdf:li 
rdf:resource="tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4649039904546083564.post-814228670360310856"
 />
                        <rdf:li 
rdf:resource="tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4649039904546083564.post-6139785145424705872"
 />
@@ -31,12 +33,37 @@
                        <rdf:li 
rdf:resource="http://www.solidoffice.com/?p=1148"; />
                        <rdf:li 
rdf:resource="tag:google.com,2005:reader/item/5fa638c35d662dc8" />
                        <rdf:li 
rdf:resource="tag:google.com,2005:reader/item/4504d0aad9f21914" />
-                       <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mealldubh.org/?p=689"; 
/>
-                       <rdf:li 
rdf:resource="http://www.solidoffice.com/?p=1143"; />
                </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
 </channel>
 
+<item rdf:about="tag:google.com,2005:reader/item/d1a38e6f8a4c00f9">
+       <title>GullFOSS: Ideation and what's next in the Renaissance 
Project</title>
+       
<link>http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS/entry/ideation_and_what_s_next</link>
+       <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt; So, the collection of design proposals and 
their refinement is over. Thanks to everyone who has participated and spent 
nights to finish either in time or a bit later. Liz will post a detailed 
summary about that part of the current phase later this week. With this post, 
I'd like to share my experience with using some ideation methods I learned in 
Berlin for UI brainstorming, and to give a short preview of what is about to 
happen in the Renaissance Project and for what reason.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br 
/&gt;But first, let’s check what we have planned and what was in the project 
road map. Here is how phase two of project Renaissance was initially set 
up:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;1.    Incorporate research 
data&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;    a.    Analyze quantitative/qualitative data 
to understand usage/users&lt;br /&gt;    b.    Create personas based on 
the analysis&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;2.    Focus on the personas' 
characteristics&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;    a.    Create scenarios for key 
functionalities&lt;br /&gt;    b.    Define information architecture from 
the scenarios&lt;br /&gt;    c.    Flow charts&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;3.   
 Generate design ideas using the scenarios&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;    a.   
 Paper prototypes&lt;br /&gt;    b.    Clickable slides&lt;br 
/&gt;    c.    Dynamic prototypes&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I am still 
convinced that our initial plan was quite well elaborated and promising. 
However, looking at that now I must admit that we were not able to achieve many 
of the tasks that are listed here. In retrospective, we jumped right from 1a to 
3b, which is of course possible but it makes many other design activities a lot 
harder at a later stage. Due to time and resources constraints, we spent only 
little time on understanding our quantitative data and almost no time on 
qualitative research. As a consequence, we were only partially able to generate 
findings that support design decisions. But still, please don’t get me wrong, 
what we got from our research is a lot more and better than relying on pure 
subjective assumptions. And that is a good thing and a good start.&lt;br 
/&gt;&lt;br /&gt;However, usually you would want to start with a redesign 
strategy that defines your redesign scope and therefore guides any of your 
design research activities such as what research questions you’d like to have 
answers to. I would say that we were quite good at this part. But as stated 
above, we were not able to answer a few of our important research questions 
such as “What is important to our users and what are their goals?”, “How 
do they feel using our product?” or “How would they like to feel using 
it?”.  In practice, these are important insights that guide your design work 
and decisions. Insufficient answers to these questions make evaluation of 
designs a lot harder. That is actually related to our upcoming 
activities.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;So, what is the objective of ideation?  As 
described in one of my earlier blog posts, ideation helps to generate a lot of 
unconstrained design ideas. By a lot I mean masses, as many as possible. This 
process is all about the quantity of ideas, not the quality or richness in 
detail.  Quantity is important since you never know where a bright idea might 
show up.  So, learn to embrace the diversity. When you think that you have 
enough crazy ideas, start getting some order. Sort them, check for overlapping 
ideas, define groups and label them. In sum, put similar things together and 
give them a name. Then take your design principles that you’ve defined with 
the help of your research findings, and start refining all the crazy ideas 
accordingly. At the end, you should have a nice set of designs that you want to 
see in action in order to verify them with real users. That is basically where 
we’re heading next, refinement and prototyping.&lt;/p&gt; 
+  &lt;p align=&quot;center&quot;&gt;&lt;a 
href=&quot;http://picasaweb.google.de/lh/photo/GsK-H2GgDckPImDvkaJ6Sw?feat=embedwebsite&quot;&gt;&lt;img
 
src=&quot;http://lh5.ggpht.com/_1V3VpP3YHN0/ShrsxLUS46I/AAAAAAAABKs/Worq-1_xaaM/s400/IMG_1086.JPG&quot;
 /&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt; 
+  &lt;p&gt;To check how that approach works in our context and what we can 
actually get out of it, I did a small ideation “experiment” for the last 
two weeks. The first week I spent on drawing sketches like a maniac by myself. 
However, through our proposal collection phase, I was too restricted in my 
head. It is actually hard to let things go to which one is so used to. Last 
week, we repeated the ideation method with a couple of colleagues with various 
backgrounds. We had Dev, QA, Tooling, and UX onboard. In two groups, we started 
brainstorming about how we would want the ideal Impress to be. For three 
minutes, everyone wrote adjectives attributed to the “imaginary” Impress on 
sticky notes and then we put them on the wall, and started sorting and 
organizing them.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Amazingly a lot of the adjectives 
overlapped. At the end, we were able to define two main groups that had a lot 
more adjectives than others. The first group could be described as the one 
concerned with usability while the second group was all about positive 
experiences, emotions and aesthetics of the product. That happed in both groups 
by the way. In sum, everyone in Dev, QA, Tooling, and UX wanted the future 
Impress to be easy to use and “pretty”! These are quite basic needs, 
aren’t they? And all from people with totally different 
backgrounds.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
+       <dc:date>2009-05-25T19:56:33+00:00</dc:date>
+       <dc:creator>Andreas Bartel</dc:creator>
+</item>
+<item rdf:about="tag:google.com,2005:reader/item/78154ce7426b0c6a">
+       <title>GullFOSS: OpenOffice.org User Survey 2009 Data Available</title>
+       
<link>http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS/entry/openoffice_org_user_survey_2009</link>
+       <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;
+The data collected by the current OOo &lt;a title=&quot;OOo Survey 2009&quot; 
href=&quot;http://surveys.services.openoffice.org/surveys/index.php?sid=69531&quot;&gt;User
 Survey 2009&lt;/a&gt; has been &lt;a title=&quot;OOo Wiki&quot; 
href=&quot;http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Renaissance:Phase_1:OOoUser_Survey2009&quot;&gt;published
 at the OOo wiki&lt;/a&gt;.
+
+The data is based on more than 125K submissions by our users within the last 
three months.
+
+Unfortunately the questions are in German due to a limitation of the survey 
tooling (we have started this new survey with the 'wrong' language this 
time;-). Please use the key of a question to grab for the English text shown on 
the right side inside the spreadsheet. Sorry for the inconvenience.&lt;/p&gt; 
+  &lt;p&gt;
+
+Best Regards,
+
+&lt;/p&gt; 
+  &lt;p&gt;Frank&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
+       <dc:date>2009-05-25T19:13:27+00:00</dc:date>
+       <dc:creator>frankl</dc:creator>
+</item>
 <item 
rdf:about="tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4649039904546083564.post-6589002475932314814">
        <title>Louis Suarez-Potts: Value : Notes on Foss 2009-05-25</title>
        
<link>http://ooo-speak.blogspot.com/2009/05/value-notes-on-foss-2009-05-25.html</link>
@@ -248,21 +275,5 @@
        <dc:date>2009-05-13T09:11:30+00:00</dc:date>
        <dc:creator>Frank Mau</dc:creator>
 </item>
-<item rdf:about="http://www.mealldubh.org/?p=689";>
-       <title>John McCreesh: After the launch was over</title>
-       
<link>http://www.mealldubh.org/index.php/2009/05/12/after-the-launch-was-over/</link>
-       <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;So, &lt;a 
href=&quot;http://www.openoffice.org/product/&quot;&gt;OpenOffice.org 
3.1&lt;/a&gt; with all its &lt;a 
href=&quot;http://www.openoffice.org/dev_docs/features/3.1/index.html&quot;&gt;lovely
 new features&lt;/a&gt; is well and truly launched, with the &lt;a 
href=&quot;http://www.prweb.com/releases/OOo/31/prweb2388264.htm&quot;&gt;official
 announcement&lt;/a&gt; last Thursday. I&amp;#8217;ve reset the download 
counter on the &lt;a 
href=&quot;http://marketing.openoffice.org/planet/&quot;&gt;Marketing 
Planet&lt;/a&gt; - as you can see from the &lt;a 
href=&quot;http://marketing.openoffice.org/marketing_bouncer.html&quot;&gt;detailed
 stats page&lt;/a&gt;, we were just a smidgeon short of 60 million downloads 
for OpenOffice.org 3.0.&lt;/p&gt;
-&lt;p&gt;The first reviews are also starting to appear in the press - 
it&amp;#8217;s worth keeping an eye on the &lt;a 
href=&quot;http://www.openoffice.org/product/reviews.html&quot;&gt;reviews 
page&lt;/a&gt; for a summary - we don&amp;#8217;t just list the good ones 
&lt;img 
src=&quot;http://www.mealldubh.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif&quot;
 alt=&quot;;)&quot; class=&quot;wp-smiley&quot; /&gt; 
&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
-       <dc:date>2009-05-12T19:06:15+00:00</dc:date>
-</item>
-<item rdf:about="http://www.solidoffice.com/?p=1143";>
-       <title>Benjamin Horst: TestFreaks’ 50 OpenOffice Tips</title>
-       <link>http://www.solidoffice.com/archives/1143</link>
-       <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;The &lt;a 
href=&quot;http://www.testfreaks.com/blog/&quot;&gt;TestFreaks Blog&lt;/a&gt; 
publishes &lt;a 
href=&quot;http://www.testfreaks.com/blog/information/mastering-open-office-50-useful-tips-to-get-you-started/&quot;&gt;Mastering
 OpenOffice: 50 Useful Tips to Get You Started&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;/p&gt;
-&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a 
href=&quot;http://www.openoffice.org/&quot;&gt;OpenOffice&lt;/a&gt; is the 
unsung software for personal usage. It offers two very convincing reasons to 
download: 1.) It’s free. And 2.) It comes with 24/7 online 
help.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
-&lt;p&gt;Yes, both true, but there is more.&lt;/p&gt;
-&lt;p&gt;The article continues, with a collection of progressively more 
advanced tips for new users of OOo. It covers wizards for installing new 
dictionaries and fonts, and the Math component is discussed, as well as Calc, 
although very briefly. Of course it covers Writer, Impress and Draw as well, 
and one final tip on Base.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
-       <dc:date>2009-05-12T02:09:55+00:00</dc:date>
-</item>
 
 </rdf:RDF>

File [changed]: rss20.xml
Url: 
http://marketing.openoffice.org/source/browse/marketing/www/planet/rss20.xml?r1=1.750&r2=1.751
Delta lines:  +27 -18
---------------------
--- rss20.xml   2009-05-25 23:00:50+0000        1.750
+++ rss20.xml   2009-05-26 11:00:38+0000        1.751
@@ -8,6 +8,33 @@
        <description>Marketing Planet - 
http://marketing.openoffice.org/planet/</description>
 
 <item>
+       <title>GullFOSS: Ideation and what's next in the Renaissance 
Project</title>
+       <guid>tag:google.com,2005:reader/item/d1a38e6f8a4c00f9</guid>
+       
<link>http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS/entry/ideation_and_what_s_next</link>
+       <description>&lt;p&gt; So, the collection of design proposals and their 
refinement is over. Thanks to everyone who has participated and spent nights to 
finish either in time or a bit later. Liz will post a detailed summary about 
that part of the current phase later this week. With this post, I'd like to 
share my experience with using some ideation methods I learned in Berlin for UI 
brainstorming, and to give a short preview of what is about to happen in the 
Renaissance Project and for what reason.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But first, 
let’s check what we have planned and what was in the project road map. Here 
is how phase two of project Renaissance was initially set up:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br 
/&gt;&lt;b&gt;1.    Incorporate research data&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;    
a.    Analyze quantitative/qualitative data to understand usage/users&lt;br 
/&gt;    b.    Create personas based on the analysis&lt;br 
/&gt;&lt;b&gt;2.    Focus on the personas' characteristics&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br 
/&gt;    a.    Create scenarios for key functionalities&lt;br /&gt;    
b.    Define information architecture from the scenarios&lt;br /&gt;    
c.    Flow charts&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;3.    Generate design ideas using 
the scenarios&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;    a.    Paper prototypes&lt;br 
/&gt;    b.    Clickable slides&lt;br /&gt;    c.    Dynamic 
prototypes&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I am still convinced that our initial plan 
was quite well elaborated and promising. However, looking at that now I must 
admit that we were not able to achieve many of the tasks that are listed here. 
In retrospective, we jumped right from 1a to 3b, which is of course possible 
but it makes many other design activities a lot harder at a later stage. Due to 
time and resources constraints, we spent only little time on understanding our 
quantitative data and almost no time on qualitative research. As a consequence, 
we were only partially able to generate findings that support design decisions. 
But still, please don’t get me wrong, what we got from our research is a lot 
more and better than relying on pure subjective assumptions. And that is a good 
thing and a good start.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;However, usually you would want 
to start with a redesign strategy that defines your redesign scope and 
therefore guides any of your design research activities such as what research 
questions you’d like to have answers to. I would say that we were quite good 
at this part. But as stated above, we were not able to answer a few of our 
important research questions such as “What is important to our users and what 
are their goals?”, “How do they feel using our product?” or “How would 
they like to feel using it?”.  In practice, these are important insights 
that guide your design work and decisions. Insufficient answers to these 
questions make evaluation of designs a lot harder. That is actually related to 
our upcoming activities.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;So, what is the objective of 
ideation?  As described in one of my earlier blog posts, ideation helps to 
generate a lot of unconstrained design ideas. By a lot I mean masses, as many 
as possible. This process is all about the quantity of ideas, not the quality 
or richness in detail.  Quantity is important since you never know where a 
bright idea might show up.  So, learn to embrace the diversity. When you think 
that you have enough crazy ideas, start getting some order. Sort them, check 
for overlapping ideas, define groups and label them. In sum, put similar things 
together and give them a name. Then take your design principles that you’ve 
defined with the help of your research findings, and start refining all the 
crazy ideas accordingly. At the end, you should have a nice set of designs that 
you want to see in action in order to verify them with real users. That is 
basically where we’re heading next, refinement and prototyping.&lt;/p&gt; 
+  &lt;p align=&quot;center&quot;&gt;&lt;a 
href=&quot;http://picasaweb.google.de/lh/photo/GsK-H2GgDckPImDvkaJ6Sw?feat=embedwebsite&quot;&gt;&lt;img
 
src=&quot;http://lh5.ggpht.com/_1V3VpP3YHN0/ShrsxLUS46I/AAAAAAAABKs/Worq-1_xaaM/s400/IMG_1086.JPG&quot;
 /&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt; 
+  &lt;p&gt;To check how that approach works in our context and what we can 
actually get out of it, I did a small ideation “experiment” for the last 
two weeks. The first week I spent on drawing sketches like a maniac by myself. 
However, through our proposal collection phase, I was too restricted in my 
head. It is actually hard to let things go to which one is so used to. Last 
week, we repeated the ideation method with a couple of colleagues with various 
backgrounds. We had Dev, QA, Tooling, and UX onboard. In two groups, we started 
brainstorming about how we would want the ideal Impress to be. For three 
minutes, everyone wrote adjectives attributed to the “imaginary” Impress on 
sticky notes and then we put them on the wall, and started sorting and 
organizing them.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Amazingly a lot of the adjectives 
overlapped. At the end, we were able to define two main groups that had a lot 
more adjectives than others. The first group could be described as the one 
concerned with usability while the second group was all about positive 
experiences, emotions and aesthetics of the product. That happed in both groups 
by the way. In sum, everyone in Dev, QA, Tooling, and UX wanted the future 
Impress to be easy to use and “pretty”! These are quite basic needs, 
aren’t they? And all from people with totally different 
backgrounds.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
+       <pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 19:56:33 +0000</pubDate>
+</item>
+<item>
+       <title>GullFOSS: OpenOffice.org User Survey 2009 Data Available</title>
+       <guid>tag:google.com,2005:reader/item/78154ce7426b0c6a</guid>
+       
<link>http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS/entry/openoffice_org_user_survey_2009</link>
+       <description>&lt;p&gt;
+The data collected by the current OOo &lt;a title=&quot;OOo Survey 2009&quot; 
href=&quot;http://surveys.services.openoffice.org/surveys/index.php?sid=69531&quot;&gt;User
 Survey 2009&lt;/a&gt; has been &lt;a title=&quot;OOo Wiki&quot; 
href=&quot;http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Renaissance:Phase_1:OOoUser_Survey2009&quot;&gt;published
 at the OOo wiki&lt;/a&gt;.
+
+The data is based on more than 125K submissions by our users within the last 
three months.
+
+Unfortunately the questions are in German due to a limitation of the survey 
tooling (we have started this new survey with the 'wrong' language this 
time;-). Please use the key of a question to grab for the English text shown on 
the right side inside the spreadsheet. Sorry for the inconvenience.&lt;/p&gt; 
+  &lt;p&gt;
+
+Best Regards,
+
+&lt;/p&gt; 
+  &lt;p&gt;Frank&lt;/p&gt;</description>
+       <pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 19:13:27 +0000</pubDate>
+</item>
+<item>
        <title>Louis Suarez-Potts: Value : Notes on Foss 2009-05-25</title>
        
<guid>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4649039904546083564.post-6589002475932314814</guid>
        
<link>http://ooo-speak.blogspot.com/2009/05/value-notes-on-foss-2009-05-25.html</link>
@@ -232,24 +259,6 @@
   &lt;p&gt;Frank&lt;/p&gt;</description>
        <pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 09:11:30 +0000</pubDate>
 </item>
-<item>
-       <title>John McCreesh: After the launch was over</title>
-       <guid>http://www.mealldubh.org/?p=689</guid>
-       
<link>http://www.mealldubh.org/index.php/2009/05/12/after-the-launch-was-over/</link>
-       <description>&lt;p&gt;So, &lt;a 
href=&quot;http://www.openoffice.org/product/&quot;&gt;OpenOffice.org 
3.1&lt;/a&gt; with all its &lt;a 
href=&quot;http://www.openoffice.org/dev_docs/features/3.1/index.html&quot;&gt;lovely
 new features&lt;/a&gt; is well and truly launched, with the &lt;a 
href=&quot;http://www.prweb.com/releases/OOo/31/prweb2388264.htm&quot;&gt;official
 announcement&lt;/a&gt; last Thursday. I&amp;#8217;ve reset the download 
counter on the &lt;a 
href=&quot;http://marketing.openoffice.org/planet/&quot;&gt;Marketing 
Planet&lt;/a&gt; - as you can see from the &lt;a 
href=&quot;http://marketing.openoffice.org/marketing_bouncer.html&quot;&gt;detailed
 stats page&lt;/a&gt;, we were just a smidgeon short of 60 million downloads 
for OpenOffice.org 3.0.&lt;/p&gt;
-&lt;p&gt;The first reviews are also starting to appear in the press - 
it&amp;#8217;s worth keeping an eye on the &lt;a 
href=&quot;http://www.openoffice.org/product/reviews.html&quot;&gt;reviews 
page&lt;/a&gt; for a summary - we don&amp;#8217;t just list the good ones 
&lt;img 
src=&quot;http://www.mealldubh.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif&quot;
 alt=&quot;;)&quot; class=&quot;wp-smiley&quot; /&gt; &lt;/p&gt;</description>
-       <pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 19:06:15 +0000</pubDate>
-</item>
-<item>
-       <title>Benjamin Horst: TestFreaks’ 50 OpenOffice Tips</title>
-       <guid>http://www.solidoffice.com/?p=1143</guid>
-       <link>http://www.solidoffice.com/archives/1143</link>
-       <description>&lt;p&gt;The &lt;a 
href=&quot;http://www.testfreaks.com/blog/&quot;&gt;TestFreaks Blog&lt;/a&gt; 
publishes &lt;a 
href=&quot;http://www.testfreaks.com/blog/information/mastering-open-office-50-useful-tips-to-get-you-started/&quot;&gt;Mastering
 OpenOffice: 50 Useful Tips to Get You Started&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;/p&gt;
-&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a 
href=&quot;http://www.openoffice.org/&quot;&gt;OpenOffice&lt;/a&gt; is the 
unsung software for personal usage. It offers two very convincing reasons to 
download: 1.) It’s free. And 2.) It comes with 24/7 online 
help.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
-&lt;p&gt;Yes, both true, but there is more.&lt;/p&gt;
-&lt;p&gt;The article continues, with a collection of progressively more 
advanced tips for new users of OOo. It covers wizards for installing new 
dictionaries and fonts, and the Math component is discussed, as well as Calc, 
although very briefly. Of course it covers Writer, Impress and Draw as well, 
and one final tip on Base.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
-       <pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 02:09:55 +0000</pubDate>
-</item>
 
 </channel>
 </rss>




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to