User: jpmcc Date: 2009-06-07 17:00:44+0000 Modified: marketing/www/planet/atom.xml marketing/www/planet/index.html marketing/www/planet/opml.xml marketing/www/planet/rss10.xml marketing/www/planet/rss20.xml
Log: Planet run at Sun Jun 7 18:00:13 BST 2009 File Changes: Directory: /marketing/www/planet/ ================================= File [changed]: atom.xml Url: http://marketing.openoffice.org/source/browse/marketing/www/planet/atom.xml?r1=1.1964&r2=1.1965 Delta lines: +34 -36 --------------------- --- atom.xml 2009-06-07 11:00:39+0000 1.1964 +++ atom.xml 2009-06-07 17:00:40+0000 1.1965 @@ -5,9 +5,35 @@ <link rel="self" href="http://marketing.openoffice.org/planet/atom.xml"/> <link href="http://marketing.openoffice.org/planet/"/> <id>http://marketing.openoffice.org/planet/atom.xml</id> - <updated>2009-06-07T11:00:26+00:00</updated> + <updated>2009-06-07T17:00:28+00:00</updated> <generator uri="http://www.planetplanet.org/">Planet/2.0 +http://www.planetplanet.org</generator> + <entry xml:lang="en"> + <title type="html">Itâs official, MS Office looks like The Gimp.</title> + <link href="http://standardsandfreedom.net/index.php/2009/06/07/its-official-ms-office-looks-like-the-gimp/"/> + <id>http://standardsandfreedom.net/index.php/2009/06/07/its-official-ms-office-looks-like-the-gimp/</id> + <updated>2009-06-07T15:20:41+00:00</updated> + <content type="html"><p>Taken from the GullFOSS blog, Andreas Mertel&#8217;s post, this is how MS Office 2008 on Mac OS X may look like, if you don&#8217;t pay enough attention:</p> +<p><a href="http://standardsandfreedom.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/bild-1.png" title="bild1"><img src="http://standardsandfreedom.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/bild-1.thumbnail.png" alt="bild1" /></a></p> +<p>Now this is, after 5 minutes of fiddling with pretty much every toolbar possible, how OpenOffice.org 3.01 looks on my Fedora 10:</p> +<p><a href="http://standardsandfreedom.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/ooocluttered.png" title="OOocluttered"><img src="http://standardsandfreedom.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/ooocluttered.thumbnail.png" alt="OOocluttered" /></a></p> +<p>To be fair, we should perhaps salute the man/years of development that have been put into both office suites first and then criticize them if we want to. But still, Andreas makes an interesting point: This is how you can render an application unusable when you work along the lines of &#8220;more is always better&#8221;.</p> +<p>Enjoy your Sunday!</p> +<p class="akst_link"><a href="http://standardsandfreedom.net/?p=129&akst_action=share-this" title="E-mail this, post to del.icio.us, etc." id="akst_link_129" class="akst_share_link" rel="nofollow">Share This</a> +</p></content> + <author> + <name>Charles Schulz</name> + <uri>http://standardsandfreedom.net</uri> + </author> + <source> + <title type="html">Moved by Freedom - Powered by Standards » OOo Postings</title> + <subtitle type="html">A weblog by Charles-H. Schulz.</subtitle> + <link rel="self" href="http://standardsandfreedom.net/index.php/category/ooo-postings/feed"/> + <id>http://standardsandfreedom.net/index.php/category/ooo-postings/feed</id> + <updated>2009-06-07T17:00:16+00:00</updated> + </source> + </entry> + <entry> <title type="html">CORRECTION: Trips: China, Japan</title> <link href="http://ooo-speak.blogspot.com/2009/05/correction-trips-china-japan.html"/> @@ -48,7 +74,7 @@ <title type="html">jpmcc's shared items in Google Reader</title> <link rel="self" href="http://www.google.co.uk/reader/public/atom/user/06203502505240591501/state/com.google/broadcast"/> <id>tag:google.com,2005:reader/user/06203502505240591501/state/com.google/broadcast</id> - <updated>2009-06-07T11:00:19+00:00</updated> + <updated>2009-06-07T17:00:17+00:00</updated> </source> </entry> @@ -111,7 +137,7 @@ <subtitle type="html">News and interesting stories about OpenOffice.org and other open source solutions.</subtitle> <link rel="self" href="http://ooomarketing.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default"/> <id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4887643299605448632</id> - <updated>2009-06-06T23:00:25+00:00</updated> + <updated>2009-06-07T17:00:26+00:00</updated> </source> </entry> @@ -181,7 +207,7 @@ <title type="html">jpmcc's shared items in Google Reader</title> <link rel="self" href="http://www.google.co.uk/reader/public/atom/user/06203502505240591501/state/com.google/broadcast"/> <id>tag:google.com,2005:reader/user/06203502505240591501/state/com.google/broadcast</id> - <updated>2009-06-07T11:00:19+00:00</updated> + <updated>2009-06-07T17:00:17+00:00</updated> </source> </entry> @@ -211,7 +237,7 @@ <subtitle type="html">A weblog by Charles-H. Schulz.</subtitle> <link rel="self" href="http://standardsandfreedom.net/index.php/category/ooo-postings/feed"/> <id>http://standardsandfreedom.net/index.php/category/ooo-postings/feed</id> - <updated>2009-06-05T23:00:16+00:00</updated> + <updated>2009-06-07T17:00:16+00:00</updated> </source> </entry> @@ -305,7 +331,7 @@ <title type="html">jpmcc's shared items in Google Reader</title> <link rel="self" href="http://www.google.co.uk/reader/public/atom/user/06203502505240591501/state/com.google/broadcast"/> <id>tag:google.com,2005:reader/user/06203502505240591501/state/com.google/broadcast</id> - <updated>2009-06-07T11:00:19+00:00</updated> + <updated>2009-06-07T17:00:17+00:00</updated> </source> </entry> @@ -325,7 +351,7 @@ <title type="html">jpmcc's shared items in Google Reader</title> <link rel="self" href="http://www.google.co.uk/reader/public/atom/user/06203502505240591501/state/com.google/broadcast"/> <id>tag:google.com,2005:reader/user/06203502505240591501/state/com.google/broadcast</id> - <updated>2009-06-07T11:00:19+00:00</updated> + <updated>2009-06-07T17:00:17+00:00</updated> </source> </entry> @@ -444,35 +470,7 @@ <subtitle type="html">News and interesting stories about OpenOffice.org and other open source solutions.</subtitle> <link rel="self" href="http://ooomarketing.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default"/> <id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4887643299605448632</id> - <updated>2009-06-06T23:00:25+00:00</updated> - </source> - </entry> - - <entry xml:lang="en"> - <title type="html">Links for the 20th of May 2009</title> - <link href="http://standardsandfreedom.net/index.php/2009/05/20/links-for-the-20th-of-may-2009/"/> - <id>http://standardsandfreedom.net/index.php/2009/05/20/links-for-the-20th-of-may-2009/</id> - <updated>2009-05-20T17:16:17+00:00</updated> - <content type="html"><ul> -<li>I wrote a bit more about <a href="https://fossbazaar.org/content/defining-certifications-open-source">Ars Aperta&#8217;s new certification project</a>. The basic idea is to award certifications to organizations that contribute or lead FOSS projects. Several types of certification exist, but in this article I discuss the specifics of what is probably the first comprehensive FOSS certification to date for companies.</li> -<li>Some people do not seem to be happy with Microsoft Office&#8217;s implementation of ODF. Check out the <a href="http://www.odfalliance.org/blog/index.php/site/microsofts_odf_support_falls_short/">ODF Alliance blog</a>. What I find amusing, besides the fact that the unfortunate side of this situation, is that there seems to be a willingness to explain that OOXML was not so bad after all.</li> -<li>I could point to other blogs, <a href="http://tuxdeluxe.org/node/296">but this one comes from Jeremy Allison, author of Samba, now working for <strike>the great Satan</strike> Google</a>. It&#8217;s actually quite interesting because what Jeremy is saying is that all this dispute seems to be based on the impression that Microsoft did the minimum to have ODF work inside MS Office. My take on this is we should first stop getting ballistic at each other, especially inside the ODF TC. What is needed in the interest of ODF and the users, is to have a careful examination not on the ODF conformance in MS Office, but on why, based on experience, the interoperability is severely hampered when using ODF with MS Office. Based on this analysis we should be able to go forward. But don&#8217;t let this fool you: this has, I&#8217;m afraid, nothing to do with the development of ODF 1.2.</li> -<li>As an interesting reminder, <a href="http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=MEMO/08/324&format=HTML&aged=0&language=EN&guiLanguage=fr">here&#8217;s what the European Commission was saying</a> about Microsoft&#8217;s announcement on the support of ODF inside MS Office last year.</li> -<li>Now, Ladies and Gents, something completely different that do not require you getting your hands dirty with Redmondian half-truths: <a href="ftp://qa-upload.services.openoffice.org/wiki-publisher/">You can test OpenOffice.org&#8217;s wiki publisher extension</a>. What does it do? It allows you to write your document directly inside OpenOffice.org, and it then translates it into the Mediawiki syntax; the extension integrates a wizard that is used to directly upload the content to any Mediawiki-style wiki out there provided you have the address, your username and password.</li> -</ul> -<p>Enjoy the Spring!</p> -<p class="akst_link"><a href="http://standardsandfreedom.net/?p=126&akst_action=share-this" title="E-mail this, post to del.icio.us, etc." id="akst_link_126" class="akst_share_link" rel="nofollow">Share This</a> -</p></content> - <author> - <name>Charles Schulz</name> - <uri>http://standardsandfreedom.net</uri> - </author> - <source> - <title type="html">Moved by Freedom - Powered by Standards » OOo Postings</title> - <subtitle type="html">A weblog by Charles-H. Schulz.</subtitle> - <link rel="self" href="http://standardsandfreedom.net/index.php/category/ooo-postings/feed"/> - <id>http://standardsandfreedom.net/index.php/category/ooo-postings/feed</id> - <updated>2009-06-05T23:00:16+00:00</updated> + <updated>2009-06-07T17:00:26+00:00</updated> </source> </entry> File [changed]: index.html Url: http://marketing.openoffice.org/source/browse/marketing/www/planet/index.html?r1=1.1971&r2=1.1972 Delta lines: +23 -25 --------------------- --- index.html 2009-06-07 11:00:40+0000 1.1971 +++ index.html 2009-06-07 17:00:41+0000 1.1972 @@ -36,8 +36,30 @@ <a href="rss20.xml"><img src="rss2.gif" alt="Link to RSS 2 feed" /></a> </div> -<p><em>Bloggings on marketing topics by project members - see <a href="#disclaimer">disclaimer</a>.<br />Last updated: June 07, 2009 11:00 AM GMT</em></p> +<p><em>Bloggings on marketing topics by project members - see <a href="#disclaimer">disclaimer</a>.<br />Last updated: June 07, 2009 05:00 PM GMT</em></p> +<h2>June 07, 2009</h2> +<h3> +<a href="http://standardsandfreedom.net" title="Moved by Freedom - Powered by Standards » OOo Postings"> +Charles Schulz</a> : +<a href="http://standardsandfreedom.net/index.php/2009/06/07/its-official-ms-office-looks-like-the-gimp/"> +Itâs official, MS Office looks like The Gimp.</a> +</h3> +<p> +<p>Taken from the GullFOSS blog, Andreas Mertel’s post, this is how MS Office 2008 on Mac OS X may look like, if you don’t pay enough attention:</p> +<p><a href="http://standardsandfreedom.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/bild-1.png" title="bild1"><img src="http://standardsandfreedom.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/bild-1.thumbnail.png" alt="bild1" /></a></p> +<p>Now this is, after 5 minutes of fiddling with pretty much every toolbar possible, how OpenOffice.org 3.01 looks on my Fedora 10:</p> +<p><a href="http://standardsandfreedom.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/ooocluttered.png" title="OOocluttered"><img src="http://standardsandfreedom.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/ooocluttered.thumbnail.png" alt="OOocluttered" /></a></p> +<p>To be fair, we should perhaps salute the man/years of development that have been put into both office suites first and then criticize them if we want to. But still, Andreas makes an interesting point: This is how you can render an application unusable when you work along the lines of “more is always better”.</p> +<p>Enjoy your Sunday!</p> +<p class="akst_link"><a href="http://standardsandfreedom.net/?p=129&akst_action=share-this" title="E-mail this, post to del.icio.us, etc." id="akst_link_129" class="akst_share_link" rel="nofollow">Share This</a> +</p></p> +<p> +<em><a href="http://standardsandfreedom.net/index.php/2009/06/07/its-official-ms-office-looks-like-the-gimp/">by Charles at June 07, 2009 03:20 PM GMT</a></em> +</p> +<br /> +<hr /> +<br /> <h2>June 05, 2009</h2> <h3> <a href="http://ooo-speak.blogspot.com/" title="ooo-speak"> @@ -389,30 +411,6 @@ <br /> <hr /> <br /> -<h2>May 20, 2009</h2> -<h3> -<a href="http://standardsandfreedom.net" title="Moved by Freedom - Powered by Standards » OOo Postings"> -Charles Schulz</a> : -<a href="http://standardsandfreedom.net/index.php/2009/05/20/links-for-the-20th-of-may-2009/"> -Links for the 20th of May 2009</a> -</h3> -<p> -<ul> -<li>I wrote a bit more about <a href="https://fossbazaar.org/content/defining-certifications-open-source">Ars Aperta’s new certification project</a>. The basic idea is to award certifications to organizations that contribute or lead FOSS projects. Several types of certification exist, but in this article I discuss the specifics of what is probably the first comprehensive FOSS certification to date for companies.</li> -<li>Some people do not seem to be happy with Microsoft Office’s implementation of ODF. Check out the <a href="http://www.odfalliance.org/blog/index.php/site/microsofts_odf_support_falls_short/">ODF Alliance blog</a>. What I find amusing, besides the fact that the unfortunate side of this situation, is that there seems to be a willingness to explain that OOXML was not so bad after all.</li> -<li>I could point to other blogs, <a href="http://tuxdeluxe.org/node/296">but this one comes from Jeremy Allison, author of Samba, now working for <strike>the great Satan</strike> Google</a>. It’s actually quite interesting because what Jeremy is saying is that all this dispute seems to be based on the impression that Microsoft did the minimum to have ODF work inside MS Office. My take on this is we should first stop getting ballistic at each other, especially inside the ODF TC. What is needed in the interest of ODF and the users, is to have a careful examination not on the ODF conformance in MS Office, but on why, based on experience, the interoperability is severely hampered when using ODF with MS Office. Based on this analysis we should be able to go forward. But don’t let this fool you: this has, I’m afraid, nothing to do with the development of ODF 1.2.</li> -<li>As an interesting reminder, <a href="http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=MEMO/08/324&format=HTML&aged=0&language=EN&guiLanguage=fr">here’s what the European Commission was saying</a> about Microsoft’s announcement on the support of ODF inside MS Office last year.</li> -<li>Now, Ladies and Gents, something completely different that do not require you getting your hands dirty with Redmondian half-truths: <a href="ftp://qa-upload.services.openoffice.org/wiki-publisher/">You can test OpenOffice.org’s wiki publisher extension</a>. What does it do? It allows you to write your document directly inside OpenOffice.org, and it then translates it into the Mediawiki syntax; the extension integrates a wizard that is used to directly upload the content to any Mediawiki-style wiki out there provided you have the address, your username and password.</li> -</ul> -<p>Enjoy the Spring!</p> -<p class="akst_link"><a href="http://standardsandfreedom.net/?p=126&akst_action=share-this" title="E-mail this, post to del.icio.us, etc." id="akst_link_126" class="akst_share_link" rel="nofollow">Share This</a> -</p></p> -<p> -<em><a href="http://standardsandfreedom.net/index.php/2009/05/20/links-for-the-20th-of-may-2009/">by Charles at May 20, 2009 05:16 PM GMT</a></em> -</p> -<br /> -<hr /> -<br /> <a id="disclaimer" name="disclaimer"></a> <p><em>Disclaimer: all views expressed on this page are those of the individual contributors, and may not reflect the views of the File [changed]: opml.xml Url: http://marketing.openoffice.org/source/browse/marketing/www/planet/opml.xml?r1=1.1964&r2=1.1965 Delta lines: +1 -1 ------------------- --- opml.xml 2009-06-07 11:00:40+0000 1.1964 +++ opml.xml 2009-06-07 17:00:41+0000 1.1965 @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ <opml version="1.1"> <head> <title>Marketing Planet</title> - <dateModified>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 11:00:27 +0000</dateModified> + <dateModified>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 17:00:28 +0000</dateModified> <ownerName>Marketing Project</ownerName> <ownerEmail>[email protected]</ownerEmail> </head> File [changed]: rss10.xml Url: http://marketing.openoffice.org/source/browse/marketing/www/planet/rss10.xml?r1=1.762&r2=1.763 Delta lines: +14 -16 --------------------- --- rss10.xml 2009-06-06 05:00:36+0000 1.762 +++ rss10.xml 2009-06-07 17:00:41+0000 1.763 @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ <items> <rdf:Seq> + <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://standardsandfreedom.net/index.php/2009/06/07/its-official-ms-office-looks-like-the-gimp/" /> <rdf:li rdf:resource="tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4649039904546083564.post-3404809581266549923" /> <rdf:li rdf:resource="tag:google.com,2005:reader/item/d0f79a90819896d8" /> <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mealldubh.org/?p=700" /> @@ -32,11 +33,23 @@ <rdf:li rdf:resource="tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4649039904546083564.post-594174081437080870" /> <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mealldubh.org/?p=695" /> <rdf:li rdf:resource="tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4887643299605448632.post-7194914077082123947" /> - <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://standardsandfreedom.net/index.php/2009/05/20/links-for-the-20th-of-may-2009/" /> </rdf:Seq> </items> </channel> +<item rdf:about="http://standardsandfreedom.net/index.php/2009/06/07/its-official-ms-office-looks-like-the-gimp/"> + <title>Charles Schulz: Itâs official, MS Office looks like The Gimp.</title> + <link>http://standardsandfreedom.net/index.php/2009/06/07/its-official-ms-office-looks-like-the-gimp/</link> + <content:encoded><p>Taken from the GullFOSS blog, Andreas Mertel&#8217;s post, this is how MS Office 2008 on Mac OS X may look like, if you don&#8217;t pay enough attention:</p> +<p><a href="http://standardsandfreedom.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/bild-1.png" title="bild1"><img src="http://standardsandfreedom.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/bild-1.thumbnail.png" alt="bild1" /></a></p> +<p>Now this is, after 5 minutes of fiddling with pretty much every toolbar possible, how OpenOffice.org 3.01 looks on my Fedora 10:</p> +<p><a href="http://standardsandfreedom.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/ooocluttered.png" title="OOocluttered"><img src="http://standardsandfreedom.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/ooocluttered.thumbnail.png" alt="OOocluttered" /></a></p> +<p>To be fair, we should perhaps salute the man/years of development that have been put into both office suites first and then criticize them if we want to. But still, Andreas makes an interesting point: This is how you can render an application unusable when you work along the lines of &#8220;more is always better&#8221;.</p> +<p>Enjoy your Sunday!</p> +<p class="akst_link"><a href="http://standardsandfreedom.net/?p=129&akst_action=share-this" title="E-mail this, post to del.icio.us, etc." id="akst_link_129" class="akst_share_link" rel="nofollow">Share This</a> +</p></content:encoded> + <dc:date>2009-06-07T15:20:41+00:00</dc:date> +</item> <item rdf:about="tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4649039904546083564.post-3404809581266549923"> <title>Louis Suarez-Potts: CORRECTION: Trips: China, Japan</title> <link>http://ooo-speak.blogspot.com/2009/05/correction-trips-china-japan.html</link> @@ -238,20 +251,5 @@ <dc:date>2009-05-21T18:08:43+00:00</dc:date> <dc:creator>ggurley</dc:creator> </item> -<item rdf:about="http://standardsandfreedom.net/index.php/2009/05/20/links-for-the-20th-of-may-2009/"> - <title>Charles Schulz: Links for the 20th of May 2009</title> - <link>http://standardsandfreedom.net/index.php/2009/05/20/links-for-the-20th-of-may-2009/</link> - <content:encoded><ul> -<li>I wrote a bit more about <a href="https://fossbazaar.org/content/defining-certifications-open-source">Ars Aperta&#8217;s new certification project</a>. The basic idea is to award certifications to organizations that contribute or lead FOSS projects. Several types of certification exist, but in this article I discuss the specifics of what is probably the first comprehensive FOSS certification to date for companies.</li> -<li>Some people do not seem to be happy with Microsoft Office&#8217;s implementation of ODF. Check out the <a href="http://www.odfalliance.org/blog/index.php/site/microsofts_odf_support_falls_short/">ODF Alliance blog</a>. What I find amusing, besides the fact that the unfortunate side of this situation, is that there seems to be a willingness to explain that OOXML was not so bad after all.</li> -<li>I could point to other blogs, <a href="http://tuxdeluxe.org/node/296">but this one comes from Jeremy Allison, author of Samba, now working for <strike>the great Satan</strike> Google</a>. It&#8217;s actually quite interesting because what Jeremy is saying is that all this dispute seems to be based on the impression that Microsoft did the minimum to have ODF work inside MS Office. My take on this is we should first stop getting ballistic at each other, especially inside the ODF TC. What is needed in the interest of ODF and the users, is to have a careful examination not on the ODF conformance in MS Office, but on why, based on experience, the interoperability is severely hampered when using ODF with MS Office. Based on this analysis we should be able to go forward. But don&#8217;t let this fool you: this has, I&#8217;m afraid, nothing to do with the development of ODF 1.2.</li> -<li>As an interesting reminder, <a href="http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=MEMO/08/324&format=HTML&aged=0&language=EN&guiLanguage=fr">here&#8217;s what the European Commission was saying</a> about Microsoft&#8217;s announcement on the support of ODF inside MS Office last year.</li> -<li>Now, Ladies and Gents, something completely different that do not require you getting your hands dirty with Redmondian half-truths: <a href="ftp://qa-upload.services.openoffice.org/wiki-publisher/">You can test OpenOffice.org&#8217;s wiki publisher extension</a>. What does it do? It allows you to write your document directly inside OpenOffice.org, and it then translates it into the Mediawiki syntax; the extension integrates a wizard that is used to directly upload the content to any Mediawiki-style wiki out there provided you have the address, your username and password.</li> -</ul> -<p>Enjoy the Spring!</p> -<p class="akst_link"><a href="http://standardsandfreedom.net/?p=126&akst_action=share-this" title="E-mail this, post to del.icio.us, etc." id="akst_link_126" class="akst_share_link" rel="nofollow">Share This</a> -</p></content:encoded> - <dc:date>2009-05-20T17:16:17+00:00</dc:date> -</item> </rdf:RDF> File [changed]: rss20.xml Url: http://marketing.openoffice.org/source/browse/marketing/www/planet/rss20.xml?r1=1.762&r2=1.763 Delta lines: +14 -16 --------------------- --- rss20.xml 2009-06-06 05:00:37+0000 1.762 +++ rss20.xml 2009-06-07 17:00:41+0000 1.763 @@ -8,6 +8,20 @@ <description>Marketing Planet - http://marketing.openoffice.org/planet/</description> <item> + <title>Charles Schulz: Itâs official, MS Office looks like The Gimp.</title> + <guid>http://standardsandfreedom.net/index.php/2009/06/07/its-official-ms-office-looks-like-the-gimp/</guid> + <link>http://standardsandfreedom.net/index.php/2009/06/07/its-official-ms-office-looks-like-the-gimp/</link> + <description><p>Taken from the GullFOSS blog, Andreas Mertel&#8217;s post, this is how MS Office 2008 on Mac OS X may look like, if you don&#8217;t pay enough attention:</p> +<p><a href="http://standardsandfreedom.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/bild-1.png" title="bild1"><img src="http://standardsandfreedom.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/bild-1.thumbnail.png" alt="bild1" /></a></p> +<p>Now this is, after 5 minutes of fiddling with pretty much every toolbar possible, how OpenOffice.org 3.01 looks on my Fedora 10:</p> +<p><a href="http://standardsandfreedom.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/ooocluttered.png" title="OOocluttered"><img src="http://standardsandfreedom.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/ooocluttered.thumbnail.png" alt="OOocluttered" /></a></p> +<p>To be fair, we should perhaps salute the man/years of development that have been put into both office suites first and then criticize them if we want to. But still, Andreas makes an interesting point: This is how you can render an application unusable when you work along the lines of &#8220;more is always better&#8221;.</p> +<p>Enjoy your Sunday!</p> +<p class="akst_link"><a href="http://standardsandfreedom.net/?p=129&akst_action=share-this" title="E-mail this, post to del.icio.us, etc." id="akst_link_129" class="akst_share_link" rel="nofollow">Share This</a> +</p></description> + <pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 15:20:41 +0000</pubDate> +</item> +<item> <title>Louis Suarez-Potts: CORRECTION: Trips: China, Japan</title> <guid>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4649039904546083564.post-3404809581266549923</guid> <link>http://ooo-speak.blogspot.com/2009/05/correction-trips-china-japan.html</link> @@ -223,22 +237,6 @@ <pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 18:08:43 +0000</pubDate> <author>[email protected] (ggurley)</author> </item> -<item> - <title>Charles Schulz: Links for the 20th of May 2009</title> - <guid>http://standardsandfreedom.net/index.php/2009/05/20/links-for-the-20th-of-may-2009/</guid> - <link>http://standardsandfreedom.net/index.php/2009/05/20/links-for-the-20th-of-may-2009/</link> - <description><ul> -<li>I wrote a bit more about <a href="https://fossbazaar.org/content/defining-certifications-open-source">Ars Aperta&#8217;s new certification project</a>. The basic idea is to award certifications to organizations that contribute or lead FOSS projects. Several types of certification exist, but in this article I discuss the specifics of what is probably the first comprehensive FOSS certification to date for companies.</li> -<li>Some people do not seem to be happy with Microsoft Office&#8217;s implementation of ODF. Check out the <a href="http://www.odfalliance.org/blog/index.php/site/microsofts_odf_support_falls_short/">ODF Alliance blog</a>. What I find amusing, besides the fact that the unfortunate side of this situation, is that there seems to be a willingness to explain that OOXML was not so bad after all.</li> -<li>I could point to other blogs, <a href="http://tuxdeluxe.org/node/296">but this one comes from Jeremy Allison, author of Samba, now working for <strike>the great Satan</strike> Google</a>. It&#8217;s actually quite interesting because what Jeremy is saying is that all this dispute seems to be based on the impression that Microsoft did the minimum to have ODF work inside MS Office. My take on this is we should first stop getting ballistic at each other, especially inside the ODF TC. What is needed in the interest of ODF and the users, is to have a careful examination not on the ODF conformance in MS Office, but on why, based on experience, the interoperability is severely hampered when using ODF with MS Office. Based on this analysis we should be able to go forward. But don&#8217;t let this fool you: this has, I&#8217;m afraid, nothing to do with the development of ODF 1.2.</li> -<li>As an interesting reminder, <a href="http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=MEMO/08/324&format=HTML&aged=0&language=EN&guiLanguage=fr">here&#8217;s what the European Commission was saying</a> about Microsoft&#8217;s announcement on the support of ODF inside MS Office last year.</li> -<li>Now, Ladies and Gents, something completely different that do not require you getting your hands dirty with Redmondian half-truths: <a href="ftp://qa-upload.services.openoffice.org/wiki-publisher/">You can test OpenOffice.org&#8217;s wiki publisher extension</a>. What does it do? It allows you to write your document directly inside OpenOffice.org, and it then translates it into the Mediawiki syntax; the extension integrates a wizard that is used to directly upload the content to any Mediawiki-style wiki out there provided you have the address, your username and password.</li> -</ul> -<p>Enjoy the Spring!</p> -<p class="akst_link"><a href="http://standardsandfreedom.net/?p=126&akst_action=share-this" title="E-mail this, post to del.icio.us, etc." id="akst_link_126" class="akst_share_link" rel="nofollow">Share This</a> -</p></description> - <pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 17:16:17 +0000</pubDate> -</item> </channel> </rss> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
