User: jpmcc Date: 2010-09-28 17:00:44+0000 Modified: marketing/www/planet/atom.xml marketing/www/planet/index.html marketing/www/planet/opml.xml marketing/www/planet/rss10.xml marketing/www/planet/rss20.xml
Log: Planet run at Tue Sep 28 19:00:23 CEST 2010 File Changes: Directory: /marketing/www/planet/ ================================= File [changed]: atom.xml Url: http://marketing.openoffice.org/source/browse/marketing/www/planet/atom.xml?r1=1.3753&r2=1.3754 Delta lines: +5 -5 ------------------- --- atom.xml 2010-09-28 11:00:38+0000 1.3753 +++ atom.xml 2010-09-28 17:00:40+0000 1.3754 @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ <link rel="self" href="http://marketing.openoffice.org/planet/atom.xml"/> <link href="http://marketing.openoffice.org/planet/"/> <id>http://marketing.openoffice.org/planet/atom.xml</id> - <updated>2010-09-28T11:00:36+00:00</updated> + <updated>2010-09-28T17:00:39+00:00</updated> <generator uri="http://www.planetplanet.org/";>Planet/2.0 +http://www.planetplanet.org</generator> <entry xml:lang="en"> @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ <li>we do not believe fiduciary copyright agreements are a good thing: In fact, we don&#8217;t have any, which means you get to keep your own copyright on your own contributions (lucky you).</li> <li>yes, we have developers. Lots of them. But we need more, and especially, we need you.</li> <li>we invite everyone, yes, everyone, even Oracle, to join us, provided you agree to be a contributor on equal footing with the others.</li> -<li>&#8220;But you&#8217;re working with Novell! Oh my Gosh you&#8217;re working with Novell! You&#8217;re a traitor!&#8221; That might sound surprising but although we use the ooo-build system the similarity with Novell&#8217;s Go-OO stops there. We do start with the OpenOffice.org vanilla version, <em>do not include the Go-OO patches </em>(okay, we do include some nice ones, but no weird OOXML-Icaza-plugin stuff) and <em>add our very own patches</em> to the sauce. Besides, the <a href="http://www.opensource.org">OSI</a> and the <a href="http://www.fsf.org">FSF</a> seem to think it&#8217;s totally fine, and we will not ship Mono stuff, ever. Feeling better now?</li> +<li>&#8220;But you&#8217;re working with Novell! Oh my Gosh you&#8217;re working with Novell! You&#8217;re a traitor!&#8221; That might sound surprising but although we use the ooo-build system the similarity with Novell&#8217;s Go-OO stops there. We do start with the OpenOffice.org vanilla version, <em>do not include the Go-OO patches </em>(okay, we do include some nice ones, but no weird ones) and <em>add our very own patches</em> to the sauce. Besides, the <a href="http://www.opensource.org">OSI</a> and the <a href="http://www.fsf.org">FSF</a> seem to think it&#8217;s totally fine, and we will not ship Mono, ever. Feeling better now?</li> </ul> <p>Now let&#8217;s dwell a bit deeper on what we announced. So why did we announce the birth of The Document Foundation? Why not? A foundation for OpenOffice.org had always been planned. But after ten years, this promise was never fulfilled, and it would seem that the new owner of Sun Microsystems, Oracle, is not keen on engaging too much with the community about this. So we decided to move on by ourselves, and move this project forward. Let&#8217;s be frank: Every FLOSS project has its own set of issues. Inside OpenOffice.org we have many issues, even though it&#8217;s one of the friendliest and most welcoming community you&#8217;ll ever find. But 10 million lines of code that are not easily hackable, a certain heaviness in our process and governance structure made us feel like we had to change something. In fact, I would go as far as claiming that the Document Foundation is the ultimate victory of the old &#8220;StarDivision&#8221; and I do feel this is their moment of glory, even more so if they choose to join us. We feel that what we&#8217;re doing is fundamentally right and is a real opportunity to deliver the promise of Free, Libre and Open Source Software.</p> <p>Of course, some people will observe that we don&#8217;t seem to have a lot of resources, and they would be right. Let me be very candid on this: The answer is the Community. Sounds naive? Let&#8217;s take a step back for a moment. When the <a href="http://www.mozilla.org">Mozilla Foundation</a> was announced, these guys counted less members and entities supporting us from day one. And what we are focusing on, indeed, is our community. We&#8217;re putting our community first, because that is something we somehow forgot to do in the (recent) past. It&#8217;s time to change that, and it&#8217;s time for The Document Foundation.</p> @@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ <subtitle type="html">A weblog by Charles-H. Schulz.</subtitle> <link rel="self" href="http://standardsandfreedom.net/index.php/category/ooo-postings/feed/"/> <id>http://standardsandfreedom.net/index.php/category/ooo-postings/feed/</id> - <updated>2010-09-28T11:00:32+00:00</updated> + <updated>2010-09-28T17:00:36+00:00</updated> </source> </entry> @@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ <subtitle type="html">a view from a dark hill</subtitle> <link rel="self" href="http://www.mealldubh.org/index.php/category/open-source/openofficeorg/feed/"/> <id>http://www.mealldubh.org/index.php/category/open-source/openofficeorg/feed/</id> - <updated>2010-09-28T11:00:26+00:00</updated> + <updated>2010-09-28T17:00:31+00:00</updated> </source> </entry> @@ -273,7 +273,7 @@ <subtitle type="html">A weblog by Charles-H. Schulz.</subtitle> <link rel="self" href="http://standardsandfreedom.net/index.php/category/ooo-postings/feed/"/> <id>http://standardsandfreedom.net/index.php/category/ooo-postings/feed/</id> - <updated>2010-09-28T11:00:32+00:00</updated> + <updated>2010-09-28T17:00:36+00:00</updated> </source> </entry> File [changed]: index.html Url: http://marketing.openoffice.org/source/browse/marketing/www/planet/index.html?r1=1.3760&r2=1.3761 Delta lines: +2 -2 ------------------- --- index.html 2010-09-28 11:00:41+0000 1.3760 +++ index.html 2010-09-28 17:00:41+0000 1.3761 @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ <a href="rss20.xml"><img src="rss2.gif" alt="Link to RSS 2 feed" /></a> </div> -<p><em>Bloggings on marketing topics by project members - see <a href="#disclaimer">disclaimer</a>.<br />Last updated: September 28, 2010 11:00 AM CET</em></p> +<p><em>Bloggings on marketing topics by project members - see <a href="#disclaimer">disclaimer</a>.<br />Last updated: September 28, 2010 05:00 PM CET</em></p> <h2>September 28, 2010</h2> <h3> @@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ <li>we do not believe fiduciary copyright agreements are a good thing: In fact, we don’t have any, which means you get to keep your own copyright on your own contributions (lucky you).</li> <li>yes, we have developers. Lots of them. But we need more, and especially, we need you.</li> <li>we invite everyone, yes, everyone, even Oracle, to join us, provided you agree to be a contributor on equal footing with the others.</li> -<li>“But you’re working with Novell! Oh my Gosh you’re working with Novell! You’re a traitor!” That might sound surprising but although we use the ooo-build system the similarity with Novell’s Go-OO stops there. We do start with the OpenOffice.org vanilla version, <em>do not include the Go-OO patches </em>(okay, we do include some nice ones, but no weird OOXML-Icaza-plugin stuff) and <em>add our very own patches</em> to the sauce. Besides, the <a href="http://www.opensource.org";>OSI</a> and the <a href="http://www.fsf.org";>FSF</a> seem to think it’s totally fine, and we will not ship Mono stuff, ever. Feeling better now?</li> +<li>“But you’re working with Novell! Oh my Gosh you’re working with Novell! You’re a traitor!” That might sound surprising but although we use the ooo-build system the similarity with Novell’s Go-OO stops there. We do start with the OpenOffice.org vanilla version, <em>do not include the Go-OO patches </em>(okay, we do include some nice ones, but no weird ones) and <em>add our very own patches</em> to the sauce. Besides, the <a href="http://www.opensource.org";>OSI</a> and the <a href="http://www.fsf.org";>FSF</a> seem to think it’s totally fine, and we will not ship Mono, ever. Feeling better now?</li> </ul> <p>Now let’s dwell a bit deeper on what we announced. So why did we announce the birth of The Document Foundation? Why not? A foundation for OpenOffice.org had always been planned. But after ten years, this promise was never fulfilled, and it would seem that the new owner of Sun Microsystems, Oracle, is not keen on engaging too much with the community about this. So we decided to move on by ourselves, and move this project forward. Let’s be frank: Every FLOSS project has its own set of issues. Inside OpenOffice.org we have many issues, even though it’s one of the friendliest and most welcoming community you’ll ever find. But 10 million lines of code that are not easily hackable, a certain heaviness in our process and governance structure made us feel like we had to change something. In fact, I would go as far as claiming that the Document Foundation is the ultimate victory of the old “StarDivision” and I do feel this is their moment of glory, even more so if they choose to join us. We feel that what we’re doing is fundamentally right and is a real opportunity to deliver the promise of Free, Libre and Open Source Software.</p> <p>Of course, some people will observe that we don’t seem to have a lot of resources, and they would be right. Let me be very candid on this: The answer is the Community. Sounds naive? Let’s take a step back for a moment. When the <a href="http://www.mozilla.org";>Mozilla Foundation</a> was announced, these guys counted less members and entities supporting us from day one. And what we are focusing on, indeed, is our community. We’re putting our community first, because that is something we somehow forgot to do in the (recent) past. It’s time to change that, and it’s time for The Document Foundation.</p> File [changed]: opml.xml Url: http://marketing.openoffice.org/source/browse/marketing/www/planet/opml.xml?r1=1.3753&r2=1.3754 Delta lines: +1 -1 ------------------- --- opml.xml 2010-09-28 11:00:42+0000 1.3753 +++ opml.xml 2010-09-28 17:00:42+0000 1.3754 @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ <opml version="1.1"> <head> <title>Marketing Planet</title> - <dateModified>Tue, 28 Sep 2010 11:00:36 +0000</dateModified> + <dateModified>Tue, 28 Sep 2010 17:00:39 +0000</dateModified> <ownerName>Marketing Project</ownerName> <ownerEmail>[email protected]</ownerEmail> </head> File [changed]: rss10.xml Url: http://marketing.openoffice.org/source/browse/marketing/www/planet/rss10.xml?r1=1.1033&r2=1.1034 Delta lines: +1 -1 ------------------- --- rss10.xml 2010-09-28 11:00:42+0000 1.1033 +++ rss10.xml 2010-09-28 17:00:42+0000 1.1034 @@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ <li>we do not believe fiduciary copyright agreements are a good thing: In fact, we don&#8217;t have any, which means you get to keep your own copyright on your own contributions (lucky you).</li> <li>yes, we have developers. Lots of them. But we need more, and especially, we need you.</li> <li>we invite everyone, yes, everyone, even Oracle, to join us, provided you agree to be a contributor on equal footing with the others.</li> -<li>&#8220;But you&#8217;re working with Novell! Oh my Gosh you&#8217;re working with Novell! You&#8217;re a traitor!&#8221; That might sound surprising but although we use the ooo-build system the similarity with Novell&#8217;s Go-OO stops there. We do start with the OpenOffice.org vanilla version, <em>do not include the Go-OO patches </em>(okay, we do include some nice ones, but no weird OOXML-Icaza-plugin stuff) and <em>add our very own patches</em> to the sauce. Besides, the <a href="http://www.opensource.org">OSI</a> and the <a href="http://www.fsf.org">FSF</a> seem to think it&#8217;s totally fine, and we will not ship Mono stuff, ever. Feeling better now?</li> +<li>&#8220;But you&#8217;re working with Novell! Oh my Gosh you&#8217;re working with Novell! You&#8217;re a traitor!&#8221; That might sound surprising but although we use the ooo-build system the similarity with Novell&#8217;s Go-OO stops there. We do start with the OpenOffice.org vanilla version, <em>do not include the Go-OO patches </em>(okay, we do include some nice ones, but no weird ones) and <em>add our very own patches</em> to the sauce. Besides, the <a href="http://www.opensource.org">OSI</a> and the <a href="http://www.fsf.org">FSF</a> seem to think it&#8217;s totally fine, and we will not ship Mono, ever. Feeling better now?</li> </ul> <p>Now let&#8217;s dwell a bit deeper on what we announced. So why did we announce the birth of The Document Foundation? Why not? A foundation for OpenOffice.org had always been planned. But after ten years, this promise was never fulfilled, and it would seem that the new owner of Sun Microsystems, Oracle, is not keen on engaging too much with the community about this. So we decided to move on by ourselves, and move this project forward. Let&#8217;s be frank: Every FLOSS project has its own set of issues. Inside OpenOffice.org we have many issues, even though it&#8217;s one of the friendliest and most welcoming community you&#8217;ll ever find. But 10 million lines of code that are not easily hackable, a certain heaviness in our process and governance structure made us feel like we had to change something. In fact, I would go as far as claiming that the Document Foundation is the ultimate victory of the old &#8220;StarDivision&#8221; and I do feel this is their moment of glory, even more so if they choose to join us. We feel that what we&#8217;re doing is fundamentally right and is a real opportunity to deliver the promise of Free, Libre and Open Source Software.</p> <p>Of course, some people will observe that we don&#8217;t seem to have a lot of resources, and they would be right. Let me be very candid on this: The answer is the Community. Sounds naive? Let&#8217;s take a step back for a moment. When the <a href="http://www.mozilla.org">Mozilla Foundation</a> was announced, these guys counted less members and entities supporting us from day one. And what we are focusing on, indeed, is our community. We&#8217;re putting our community first, because that is something we somehow forgot to do in the (recent) past. It&#8217;s time to change that, and it&#8217;s time for The Document Foundation.</p> File [changed]: rss20.xml Url: http://marketing.openoffice.org/source/browse/marketing/www/planet/rss20.xml?r1=1.1033&r2=1.1034 Delta lines: +1 -1 ------------------- --- rss20.xml 2010-09-28 11:00:44+0000 1.1033 +++ rss20.xml 2010-09-28 17:00:42+0000 1.1034 @@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ <li>we do not believe fiduciary copyright agreements are a good thing: In fact, we don&#8217;t have any, which means you get to keep your own copyright on your own contributions (lucky you).</li> <li>yes, we have developers. Lots of them. But we need more, and especially, we need you.</li> <li>we invite everyone, yes, everyone, even Oracle, to join us, provided you agree to be a contributor on equal footing with the others.</li> -<li>&#8220;But you&#8217;re working with Novell! Oh my Gosh you&#8217;re working with Novell! You&#8217;re a traitor!&#8221; That might sound surprising but although we use the ooo-build system the similarity with Novell&#8217;s Go-OO stops there. We do start with the OpenOffice.org vanilla version, <em>do not include the Go-OO patches </em>(okay, we do include some nice ones, but no weird OOXML-Icaza-plugin stuff) and <em>add our very own patches</em> to the sauce. Besides, the <a href="http://www.opensource.org">OSI</a> and the <a href="http://www.fsf.org">FSF</a> seem to think it&#8217;s totally fine, and we will not ship Mono stuff, ever. Feeling better now?</li> +<li>&#8220;But you&#8217;re working with Novell! Oh my Gosh you&#8217;re working with Novell! You&#8217;re a traitor!&#8221; That might sound surprising but although we use the ooo-build system the similarity with Novell&#8217;s Go-OO stops there. We do start with the OpenOffice.org vanilla version, <em>do not include the Go-OO patches </em>(okay, we do include some nice ones, but no weird ones) and <em>add our very own patches</em> to the sauce. Besides, the <a href="http://www.opensource.org">OSI</a> and the <a href="http://www.fsf.org">FSF</a> seem to think it&#8217;s totally fine, and we will not ship Mono, ever. Feeling better now?</li> </ul> <p>Now let&#8217;s dwell a bit deeper on what we announced. So why did we announce the birth of The Document Foundation? Why not? A foundation for OpenOffice.org had always been planned. But after ten years, this promise was never fulfilled, and it would seem that the new owner of Sun Microsystems, Oracle, is not keen on engaging too much with the community about this. So we decided to move on by ourselves, and move this project forward. Let&#8217;s be frank: Every FLOSS project has its own set of issues. Inside OpenOffice.org we have many issues, even though it&#8217;s one of the friendliest and most welcoming community you&#8217;ll ever find. But 10 million lines of code that are not easily hackable, a certain heaviness in our process and governance structure made us feel like we had to change something. In fact, I would go as far as claiming that the Document Foundation is the ultimate victory of the old &#8220;StarDivision&#8221; and I do feel this is their moment of glory, even more so if they choose to join us. We feel that what we&#8217;re doing is fundamentally right and is a real opportunity to deliver the promise of Free, Libre and Open Source Software.</p> <p>Of course, some people will observe that we don&#8217;t seem to have a lot of resources, and they would be right. Let me be very candid on this: The answer is the Community. Sounds naive? Let&#8217;s take a step back for a moment. When the <a href="http://www.mozilla.org">Mozilla Foundation</a> was announced, these guys counted less members and entities supporting us from day one. And what we are focusing on, indeed, is our community. We&#8217;re putting our community first, because that is something we somehow forgot to do in the (recent) past. It&#8217;s time to change that, and it&#8217;s time for The Document Foundation.</p> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
