On Tue, 26 Feb 2002 23:30:29 +0000 (UTC), Brian Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I think that the semantics above are fine. I thought you just meant that >it should be changed because it looked ugly. I don't see any endian >issue with it; it is translating from network-byte-order to the native >byte order, which seems right to me. If it's compiled on a machine with a different byte order (PPC for example) it'll break as network byte order is the same as native byte order on those machines. Not so much of an issue for sspi which is NT only, but I'm surprised the gserver code had something like that in it. Tony _______________________________________________ Cvsnt mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.cvsnt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cvsnt
