We too have noticed considerably slower performance in graphing and diffing
with the following change:

1.1 CVS on and old single proc Linux 6.2 box
1.2 Windows Clients using pserver

and have changed to..

CVSNT 1.11.1.3 rc2 (Build 55) on a dual 800 PIII Win2k box
1.3.7.1 beta 7 Windows clients using ntserver

Hard to tell with that many variable changes what the issue(s) are with
respect to performance.  I'm going to do some testing over the next week or
so.  If anyone else has some ideas I'd be happy to hear about them :)

Cheers,

Sean


"Bo Berglund" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED].;
> I have installed the very latest versions of cvsnt and wincvs (built
> myself off of the latest updates) on the clients at a location where I
> am normally only connected via a VPN tunnel.
> While I was here I have noticed that the performance has been
> noticeably slower than before, especially the graph done in WinCvs
> takes almost forever. This is really strange because I am now on a 100
> Mbps local network and everything should work almost instantaneously.
> Commits also take a very long time.
> I notice that updates towards Tony's server on the Internet using that
> same WinCvs client works much faster, graphs take a second or two
> instead of half a minute on the local LAN etc.
>
> Question:
> Is there a performance hit when I use ntserver as opposed to pserver
> nowadays? I didn't see anything like that before but now it seems like
> ntserver has slowed down considerably.
>
> Any thoughts? Has anyone else seen this?
>
>
>
> Bo Berglund
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> _______________________________________________
> Cvsnt mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.cvsnt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cvsnt


_______________________________________________
Cvsnt mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.cvsnt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cvsnt

Reply via email to