Brian Smith wrote: > At my site we need to have a the CVS.EXE used by our developers built > without server support (for security reasons, we're not supposed to run > servers on our workstations). I know that the CVS95 project is > client-only. Probably, it also doesn't work with named pipes, which is > also good for my site since I'm planning on exclusively using the > :gserver: support I just checked in. Are there any other limitations to > cvs95.exe vs. cvs.exe? > Yes, it doesn't authenticate at all (because it assumes that user accounts don't really exist, which is true on Win95). It delegates all its authentication to the server... this shouldn't be a huge problem though.
Tony _______________________________________________ Cvsnt mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.cvsnt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cvsnt
