Brian Smith wrote: > > So, do you want a hash for each revision or for the file as a whole? I > am thinking that a single hash for the file would be sufficient. > A hash for each version would be useful. If you take a hash of the complete file before checkin (I think cvs already does this) then store it, when you reconstruct the file for checkout you can verify that the checkout is working correctly as well (no bugs in the diff algorithm, etc.)
Tony _______________________________________________ Cvsnt mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.cvsnt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cvsnt
