Bo Berglund wrote: > get the builds in there too. Why not throw away the third item and get > this as cvsnt version: > 1.11.3.58-1.11.3.59-1.11.3.60 etc?
I'm tempted to go with to 1.12 or 2.00 since the new version is getting less and less like the cvs version is was based on. I'll decide that later, though. I think Brian was going to merge some changes onto the release branch so he might want to do any version changes to that. I've already versioned most of the files on my development copy here (I can't commit at the moment... I broke a bit too much stuff over the last couple of days). Tony _______________________________________________ Cvsnt mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.cvsnt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cvsnt
