Excuse my bad english. What version of wincvs do you use ? 1.3.8b1 is very faster than 1.3.7b1
-----Message d'origine----- De�: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] De la part de Stuart Yoder Envoy�: vendredi 19 avril 2002 21:19 ��: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Objet�: Re: [Cvsnt] cvs nt performance issue By the way-- I am using the sspi communication mechanism. Stuart "Stuart Yoder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message a9pq7f$eha$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:a9pq7f$eha$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Our organization currently uses WinCVS with the repository > directly accessed through mapped drives. I would like to move > to a real client/server set up and have been experimenting with > cvsnt. I have things working, but am having performance problems. > > If I issue the 'cvs version' command on the server itself it takes > 0.2 seconds according to the cygwin time command. > > On a networked client machine machine (Windows) on the network > 'cvs version' takes 15 seconds. Is this in the ballpark of normal?? > Other commands take as long or longer. > > A 15 and greater second delay on every command may be > unacceptable. > > Thanks. > > Stuart Yoder > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > _______________________________________________ > Cvsnt mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.cvsnt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cvsnt _______________________________________________ Cvsnt mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.cvsnt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cvsnt _______________________________________________ Cvsnt mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.cvsnt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cvsnt
