On Fri, 26 Jul 2002 22:57:23 +0100, Bo Berglund wrote:
> What happens if you try the sspi protocol instead? > Supposedly this will not use the named pipes so the shared drive > workaround will not be needed. > > I am rally interested to hear what comes out of this test so please > send me all details about the CVSNT server config and the client > (WinCvs) setup if you are successful with sspi. > It should work with SSPI, which only needs enough to perform a remote logon to the server. Overstrict domain security might break it though, in which case you'd (ironically) be down to an insecure protocol like pserver. Tony _______________________________________________ Cvsnt mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.cvsnt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cvsnt
