> No - it is as Jan already replied.  The slave passes all the writes to
> the master which would then fail the commit.  The system is failsafe in
> this way.

Now that I read it a second time, I got it :-)

So this is not two local cvsnt servers, that synchronize once in a while,
but it is more of one cvsnt server and one cvs-proxy-with-local-cache.

Thanks :-)

Cheers,
Carsten
_______________________________________________
cvsnt mailing list
cvsnt@cvsnt.org
http://www.cvsnt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cvsnt

Reply via email to