> No - it is as Jan already replied. The slave passes all the writes to > the master which would then fail the commit. The system is failsafe in > this way.
Now that I read it a second time, I got it :-) So this is not two local cvsnt servers, that synchronize once in a while, but it is more of one cvsnt server and one cvs-proxy-with-local-cache. Thanks :-) Cheers, Carsten _______________________________________________ cvsnt mailing list cvsnt@cvsnt.org http://www.cvsnt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cvsnt