Thanks for the link, Scott. - Robert

Scott Granneman wrote:
creating that graph would be extremely, extremely, extremely difficult
using automated tools.

scott

Robert Citek wrote:
>
> Edward Tufte has a great graph of Napoleon's march to Waterloo and back
> in his book "The Visual Display of Quantitative Information:
>
> http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0961392142/
>
> I'm looking for a link to that graph, which I believe was published
> originally in the 1800's. Also, does anyone know of a graphing package
> that can create that graph given the original raw data?


-- R. Scott Granneman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ www.granneman.com
Full list of publications: http://www.granneman.com/publications
My new book on Firefox: Don't Click on the Blue E!
Info at: http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/bluee/
Read the Open Source Blog: http://opensource.weblogsinc.com
Join GranneNotes! Information at www.granneman.com


http://www.edwardtufte.com/tufte/posters
http://www.ischool.utexas.edu/~l38613dw/website_spring_03/images/ NapoleonsMarch1.gif
napoleon's march


   "Charles Joseph Minard (1781-1870), the French engineer, which
shows the terrible fate of Napoleon's army in Russia. Described by E.
J. Marey as seeming to defy the pen of the historian by its brutal
eloquence, this combination of data map and time-series, drawn in
1861, portrays the devastating losses suffered in Napoleon's Russian
campaign of 1812. Beginning at the left on the Polish-Russian border
near the Niemen River, the thick band shows the size of the army
(422,000 men) as it invaded Rus�sia in June 1812. The width of the
band indicates the size of the army at each place on the map. In
September, the army reached Moscow, which was by then sacked and
deserted, with 100,000 men. The path of Napoleon's retreat from Moscow
is depicted by the darker, lower band, which is linked to a
temperature scale and dates at the bottom of the chart. It was a
bitterly cold winter, and many froze on the march out of Russia. As
the graphic shows, the crossing of the Berezina River was a disaster,
and the army finally struggled back into Poland with only 10,000 men
remaining. Also shown are the movements of auxiliary troops, as they
sought to protect the rear and the flank of the advancing army.
Minard's graphic tells a rich coherent storv with its multivariate
data, far more enlightening than just a single number bouncing along
over time. Six variables are plotted: the size of the army, its
location on a two-dimensional surface, direction of the army's
movement, and temperature on various dates during the retreat from
Moscow.

"It may well be the best statistical graphic ever drawn." (Endnote 6)


_______________________________________________
CWE-LUG mailing list
http://www.cwelug.org/
[email protected]
http://lists.firepipe.net/listinfo/cwe-lug

Reply via email to