We have a solution! As expected, we will be kicking ourselves for a while for having overlooked this detail!
Thanks again to everyone who helped - it might have taken quite a bit longer without you guys... --Don Ellis On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 11:16 PM, L. V. Lammert <...> wrote: > On Thu, 17 Jan 2013, megadave wrote: > >> Ok, its possible that the problem is that the machine on the .1 >> network, doesnt have a route to the .3.x network via 1.253, if all it >> has is a default route via the router at 1.254..... >> >> You need to add a static route on the 10.0.1.200 machine that says >> >> destination 10.0.3.0, mask 255.255.255.0, gateway 10.0.1.253 >> > BINGO! Adding routes from each server to the proxy server worked! > > One of these days it will make sense, .. in the meantime, THANKS!! > > Lee (& Don) > _______________________________________________ > grlug mailing list > [email protected] > http://shinobu.grlug.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/grlug -- Central West End Linux Users Group (via Google Groups) Main page: http://www.cwelug.org To post: [email protected] To subscribe: [email protected] To unsubscribe: [email protected] More options: http://groups.google.com/group/cwelug
