On 15 November 2017 at 22:00, Leandro Garcia <leandro.garci...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> In my own experience, cx_Freeze is not 100% accurate resolving
> dependencies of dependencies... (do not ask me why)...
>
cx_Freeze finds dependencies using static analysis - it inspects your code
and tries to work out what it will load. Since Python's a very dynamic
language, this doesn't always work very well: you can load libraries in
ways that static analysis doesn't detect.
I've been building an experimental tool called 'kartoffel' which identifies
dependencies by dynamic analysis. You run your application inside it, and
when you close your application, it lists all the modules that were
actually loaded. I haven't tested this much yet, but I hope it will find
dependencies more reliably than static analysis.
https://pypi.python.org/pypi/kartoffel
Best wishes,
Thomas
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
cx-freeze-users mailing list
cx-freeze-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cx-freeze-users
