Hi Dan,
What's the 'HTTP binding' for? is it just for REST?
If so why call it 'HTTP binding'? can we call it 'REST binding'?
'HTTP' sounds just like a transport.
The 'HTTP binding' is use HTTP transport, right? so we have 'HTTP over
HTTP'? sounds weird.
Another question is that current CXF REST support is based on JAX-WS,
why we need the 'HTTP binding' to expose the JAX-WS service again?
Thanks,
James.
Author: dandiep
Date: Mon Oct 23 11:52:16 2006
New Revision: 467080
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=467080
Log:
Add an "HTTP binding" which uses the Java Rest Annotations (new project at the
Codehaus which James Strachan and I started) to expose JAX-WS services as REST
style services.
Thanks to Guillaume Nodet who supplied the IriDecoderHelper class which was
indispensible.
Currently this just includes:
o simple server side functionality to take JAX-WS operations and expose them
as resources using the @HttpResource annotation and @Get/@Put/@Post/@Delete.
o Ability to take URI parameters and construct an incoming XML document
according to WSDL 2 spec
o Ability to take URI parameters and an incoming XML document and merge them
Other things in this commit:
o Fixed the JAXBDataBinding so we didn't twice initialize the Types if the
WSDLServiceBuilder already did it.
o Added support for recognizing unwrapped operations in XMLOutInterceptor
