> On 10/9/06, Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > 14 +1s (12 binding) > > 1 +0s (1 binding) > > 1 0s (1 binding) > > 1 -1 (1 binding) > > > > Congrats! We have a name, at least for now. :-) > > doesnt apache style voting work in a way that one -1 is a veto and > thus the proposal cant be accepted?
From: http://apache.org/foundation/voting.html Votes on procedural issues follow the common format of majority rule unless otherwise stated. That is, if there are more favourable votes than unfavorable ones, the issue is considered to have passed. For the most part, there are only two votes where a -1 is a veto: 1) Code modifications - the -1 must also have a technical reason for the veto. 2) In the Incubator, the iPMC can "veto" a release. Like a code modification, there should be a technical reason that the podling should fix to turn the -1 into a +1. Out of the incubator, a release isn't veto-able. Enjoy! -- J. Daniel Kulp Principal Engineer IONA P: 781-902-8727 C: 508-380-7194 F:781-902-8001 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
