I thought Tom already fix this problem last Friday.
And i think the better solution is to report a bug to ws-common , not in cxf.
But anyway, tom already fix that.


Dan Diephouse 写道:
Michael - did this ever get resolved? If not, can you create a JIRA issue so we make sure it doesn't get lost?

- Dan

Michael Bricout wrote:

Hi,

I have a test case that uses a set of WSDLs and schemas with multiple
imports using relative URIs.

ie: A.wsdl imports B.xsd that imports C.xsd, all are located in the
same directory.

In A.wsdl:
<xsd:import namespace="http://foo"; schemaLocation="./B.xsd"/>

In B.xsd:
<xsd:import namespace="http://foo/bar"; schemaLocation="./C.xsd"/>

Code generation works fine, however I have a problem at runtime where
the server fails to initialize with the following exception:

java.lang.RuntimeException: org.apache.ws.commons.schema.XmlSchemaException:
/[my project path]/C.xsd (No such file or directory)

The problem is that the URI for importing C.xsd is incorrectly determined.
In the example above, C.xsd would actually be located in
/[my project path]/target/test/wsdl/C.xsd


I see the following behavior in org.apache.cxf.resource.URIResolver:


For A imports B, we create a URIResolver with the following parameters:
baseUriStr = "file:[path to A]/A.wsdl" (correct)
uriStr = "./B.xsd"

Then tryFileSystem(baseUriStr, uriStr) is invoked and B.xsd is correctly
resolved.


Now for B import C, we create a URIResolver with the following parameters:
baseUriStr = "./B.xsd"
uriStr = "./C.xsd"

The value for the base URI being set to a relative path, we fail to resolve
C.xsd. tryFileSystem ends up calling tryClasspath("./C.xsd"), which in
turn calls tryRemote(), which aborts on a MalformedURLException.


I simplified my test case a bit in an effort to isolate the issue, but
I get the same problem when using relative URIs to import schemas
from different directories.


Should I file a bug report for this, or am I doing something wrong ?

This use case was working before the switch from XmlSchema 1.0.2 to 1.1

Best regards,
Michael






Reply via email to