Quick question regarding #2 - Do other RM implementations include a RelatesTo header in partial responses?
Also, could we determine if its a partial response by checking to see if the Action is a SequenceAcknowledgement? - Dan On 1/9/07, Glynn, Eoghan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
OK, back to the drawing board on this one :( A quick google on this question suggests that, notwithstanding some confusion, an empty SOAP body is actually kosher in certain circumstances ... see for example [1]. So off the top of my head, I think we'd have to do something like the following to make the partial/full response distinction more bullet-proof: 1. Stop sending the wsa:RelatesTo in the partial response (this is potentially misleading in any case) 2. Set something like a Message.IS_RESPONSE property to false in the WS-A layer if the wsa:RelatesTo header is not present 3. Replace the ClientImpl.isPartialResponse() logic with Boolean.FALSE.equals(inMessage.get(Message.IS_RESPONSE)) Checking via Boolean.FALSE.equals() would ensure that the ClientImpl logic would be valid even if WS-A layer was absent (in which case the IS_RESPONSE property would be null, but we can assume that a partial response would never be received, as this may only occur if WS-A headers were present in the corresponding request). Cheers, Eoghan [1] http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jbossws-issues/2006-October/000022.html > -----Original Message----- > From: Andrea Smyth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 09 January 2007 09:58 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Identification of Partial Responses > > Further to the dicussions on the > "JaxwsInterceptorRemoverInterceptor and RM" subject on the > different ways to identify a partial response I came accross > an example of application messages with empty soap bodies. > This is in the > org.apache.cxf.systest.basicDOCBare.DOCBareClientServerTest > system test, where the response to the putLastTradedPrice > invocation is a soap message with an empty body. > Addressing is not involved. > First off, is the empty ssoap body OK and to be expected? > Secondly, if it is, what should I expect if this > client-server setup uses addressing and non-anonymous > ReplyTo? It seems we can distinguish the partial response > from the real response not by checking for an empty body > (regardless if this results in empty of no list content in the > message) but need to look also at the addressing headers ... > Any ideas? > > Andrea. >
-- Dan Diephouse Envoi Solutions http://envoisolutions.com | http://netzooid.com/blog
