Dan Diephouse wrote:
Do we have a list of policies we're looking to support? Security, RM, and
MTOM are on my list so far, but I don't claim to have a comprehensive
one.
Not that I know of - but I don't think we need one as support for
additional policies should be pluggable, i.e. become available by
registering AssertionBuilderFactories (which would happen by simply
adding stuff to the classpath)?
I'm still digesting your proposal/questions and will try to provide some
feedback tomorrow, but has anyone given any thought to using policy for
configuration as opposed to just policy?
Celtix did this - you could have a policy with an RMAssertion attached
to a wsdl element - and a property of the same type (RMAssertion) in the
endpoint configuration bean - the latter superseding the former.
Conversely, the data types used for http and jms configuration may
become assertions (understood only by CXF of course).
One of the benefits of a policy framework is that is makes interceptor
chain configuration a lot easier.
Andrea.
- Dan
On 1/15/07, Andrea Smyth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have written up some ideas on a WS-Policy implementation for CXF on
the wiki:
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CXF/WS-Policy+Framework
Any feedback appreciated.
Andrea.
