I have logged this issue. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-389
Thanks Bharath http://jroller.com/page/bharath ----- Original Message ----- From: Daniel Kulp To: [email protected] Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2007 2:37 AM Subject: Re: org.apache.cxf.jaxws.EndpointImpl constructor On Tuesday 23 January 2007 03:57, Bharath Ganesh wrote: > Hi > > Currently (in M1 release) the constructor of EndpointImpl looks like > *public EndpointImpl(Bus b, Object implementor, JaxWsServiceFactoryBean > serviceFactory).* > > Instead it would be better if it takes an AbstractJaxWsServiceFactoryBean > instead of JaxWsServiceFactoryBean. This would be helpful for Provider > based endpoints to use this contructor, since JaxWsServiceFactoryBean and > ProviderServiceFactoryBean are subclasses of > AbstractJaxWsServiceFactoryBean. > > Is this possible? Not only possible, but definitely more "correct". The internal field that is set actually is an AbstractJaxWsServiceFactoryBean: private AbstractJaxWsServiceFactoryBean serviceFactory; ..... this.serviceFactory = serviceFactory; Nothing in the constructor requires it to be the specific subclass. I'll go ahead and make that change. Thanks! -- J. Daniel Kulp Principal Engineer IONA P: 781-902-8727 C: 508-380-7194 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
