On Wednesday 24 January 2007 14:30, Dan Diephouse wrote: > I don't have any insight into why, but it does seem similar. If we used the > JMX interfaces would that mean we would have to distribute a JMX jar as > well? Or would that be a "soft" dependency?
Built into JDK 1.5. Nothing we need to do. Dan > > On 1/24/07, Soltysik, Seumas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > In CXF I noticed that you are using a home-grown eventing mechanism that > > is based upon basic interfaces described in java.util package. However, > > this infrastructure seems to duplicate much of what already exists in the > > JMX Eventing classes. Why not simply use JMX Eventing as the internal > > eventing mechanism? Exposing events to other system would simply be a > > matter of creating an registering a JMX Listener so you are not tied to > > only exposing events to JMX systems. > > Regards, > > Seumas -- J. Daniel Kulp Principal Engineer IONA P: 781-902-8727 C: 508-380-7194 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
