Any one know if any implementations send ^M in attachment headers? I could see this causing issues if so. - Dan
On 2/20/07, Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Rick, On Tuesday 20 February 2007 10:35, Daniel Kulp wrote: > On Tuesday 20 February 2007 10:15, Rick McGuire wrote: > > Geronimo has implementations of activation-1.1 and mail-1.4. I was the > > author of both. > > Oh. Cool. Last I had checked (early Dec), they were in trunk, but not > yet available on the maven repositories. (not released) I see they are > there now. And annotation. Good. I'll see if CXF can build/run with > them. OK. I managed to get CXF to use the geronimo specs versions of annotation, servlet, mail, and activation. I had some problems with Mail. The Geronimo Specs version is definitely not a 100% drop in replacement for Sun's 1.4 versions. The InternetHeaders object from Sun is much more tolerant of "out of spec" streams (example: unix EOL style) than Geronimo. We had a couple tests that failed, but it's because of bad test data. As soon as I did a unix2dos on the test data, the tests passed. Anyway, I'm committing the changes to CXF now. -- J. Daniel Kulp Principal Engineer IONA P: 781-902-8727 C: 508-380-7194 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Dan Diephouse Envoi Solutions http://envoisolutions.com | http://netzooid.com/blog
