Great, thanks Dan :)
> -----Original Message----- > From: Dan Diephouse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 23 February 2007 15:10 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: HTTPClientPolicy [updating demos with refactored config] > > Not yet. Its very high on my list... I just updated the JMS > documentation two days ago. I'm hoping to get to the samples today. > > - Dan > > On 2/22/07, Glynn, Eoghan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Dan Diephouse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: 12 February 2007 14:43 > > > To: [email protected] > > > Subject: Re: HTTPClientPolicy > > > > > > Hi Eoghan, > > > > > > I think the HTTP samples got updated, but I'm not sure > about the JMS > > > ones. > > > I'll try and spend some time on it today. Thanks, > > > - Dan > > > > > > Hi Dan, > > > > Did you ever get a chance to go through the demos and > update these to > > the simplified config? > > > > Just happened to notice that the hello_world_https sample > doesn't seem > > to have been done, so there may be others still out of date. > > > > Cheers, > > Eoghan > > > > > > > > > On 2/12/07, Glynn, Eoghan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > From: Dan Diephouse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > Sent: 11 February 2007 20:45 > > > > > To: [email protected] > > > > > Subject: Re: HTTPClientPolicy > > > > > > > > > > Sorry for the confusion, the samples may be out of date. > > > > > > > > Dan, > > > > > > > > Probably a good idea that we get these samples updated to > > > match your > > > > config changes as a matter of urgency. Can you raise a JIRA > > > describing > > > > what needs to be done? > > > > > > > > Also, were the system tests updated, do you know? > > > > > > > > /Eoghan > > > > > > > > > started changing the way configuration works last week to > > > simplify > > > > > it a lot. People shouldn't have to do all the <bean.../> > > > stuff now. > > > > > > > > > > The rough format for http config is now: > > > > > > > > > > <conduit > > > > > id="{http://apache.org/hello_world_soap_http}Greeter1.http-con > > > > > > > > > duit<http://apache.org/hello_world_soap_http%7DGreeter1.http-conduit > > > > > > > > > > > "> > > > > > <client.../> > > > > > <ssClient../> > > > > > <authorization.../> > > > > > <proxyAuthorization.../> > > > > > </conduit> > > > > > > > > > > It is all in one namespace now too: > > > > > http://cxf.apache.org/transports/http/configuration > > > > > > > > > > - Dan > > > > > > > > > > On 2/11/07, Polar Humenn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Dan, > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for the prompt response. > > > > > > > > > > > > Dan Diephouse wrote: > > > > > > > You can see the schema in the http transport module for > > > > > more detail, > > > > > > > but here is a sample: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <conduit > > > > > id="{your:service:namespace}EndpointName.http-conduit" xmlns=" > > > > > > > http://cxf.apache.org/transports/http/configuration";> > > > > > > > <client AllowChunking="false"/> </conduit> \ > > > > > > > > > > > > Well, that's quite not what I was expecting! Does the > > > > > above just go > > > > > > in the top level client.xml file? How does that > interact with > > > > > > something like below, which works with the sample > directories? > > > > > > What happens if you have both? What takes > precedence, if there > > > > > is precedence? > > > > > > > > > > > > <bean > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > name="{http://apache.org/hello_world_soap_http}Greeter1.http-conduit"; > > > > > > abstract="true"> > > > > > > <property name="authorization"> > > > > > > <value> > > > > > > <sec:authorization> > > > > > > <sec:UserName>Polar</sec:UserName> > > > > > > <sec:Password>querty</sec:Password> > > > > > > </sec:authorization> > > > > > > </value> > > > > > > </property> > > > > > > </bean> > > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > -Polar > > > > > > > - Dan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 2/10/07, Polar Humenn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> Greetings, what is the way to write XML in a client.xml > > > > > > >> file that > > > > > > allows > > > > > > >> me to configure the HTTPClientPolicy for a particular > > > > > endpoint? I > > > > > > >> am having trouble tracking this down. I want to shut off > > > > > > >> streaming() or chunking which seams to be the default. > > > > > > >> I have to set some <AllowChunking>false</AllowChunking> > > > > > > >> item somewhere, but where? > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> Thanks, > > > > > > >> -Polar > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Dan Diephouse > > > > > Envoi Solutions > > > > > http://envoisolutions.com | http://netzooid.com/blog > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Dan Diephouse > > > Envoi Solutions > > > http://envoisolutions.com | http://netzooid.com/blog > > > > > > > > > -- > Dan Diephouse > Envoi Solutions > http://envoisolutions.com | http://netzooid.com/blog >
