Jarek Gawor wrote: > Oh... I didn't even realize you guys are targeting JAX-WS 2.1. Now, > I'm not sure how that affects things.
If the JavaEE5 TCK is only JAX-WS 2.0 compliant, this may be a problem. > > Jarek > > On 3/1/07, Dan Diephouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I'm happy to revert the change, but I think that we ultimately need it. I >> believe we're targeting JAX-WS 2.1 (we switched the API jar the other >> day), >> and that requires JAXB 2.1. There are many benefits from a user >> perspective >> in 2.1. For isntance it has a lot better functionality for things like >> WS-A >> and also makes it easier for people to use substitution types, which >> requires all sorts of hacks right now. >> >> Is Geronimo just looking to release JAX-WS 2.0 support or 2.1? Any >> idea if >> its possible to certify Geronimo with 2.1? Or does certification >> require 2.0? >> I'm not sure what the status is of the JAX-WS 2.1 TCK either. >> >> - Dan >> >> (I CC'd [EMAIL PROTECTED] in, hope thats ok) >> >> On 2/28/07, Jarek Gawor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > >> > Hi again, >> > >> > CXF code was recently upgraded to JAXB 2.1 and so I tired to figure >> > out what sort of implications that might have on Geronimo. First of >> > all, JAXB is one of those libraries that is shared by all applications >> > in the Geronimo server. We also have a bunch of different components >> > using JAXB to do deployment descriptor parsing, etc. So if we upgrade >> > JAXB in G, we have to retest all these subcomponents to make sure they >> > are ok. And I think in general that should be ok but potentially time >> > consuming. Another potential issue that somebody raised was TCK >> > testing. We don't know what happens if for example TCK expects JAXB >> > 2.0 API but gets JAXB 2.1 API/implementation. Maybe nothing (as things >> > supposed to be backwards compatible) but maybe it blows up. That's >> > another thing for us to worry about. >> > >> > So, if this JAXB upgrade is not a critical issue for CXF would it be >> > possible to switch back to JAXB 2.0? >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Jarek >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Dan Diephouse >> Envoi Solutions >> http://envoisolutions.com | http://netzooid.com/blog >>
