Well if no one objects, I'm going to get rid of the support for <endpoints> and just have CXF delegate to Spring for this case. I really don't want to explain to users which configuration format they have to use...
- Dan On 3/24/07, Dan Diephouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Did we ultimately decide to get rid of the support for the JAX-WS RI <endpoints> syntax? Or use XSLT? Or keep the JAX-WS RI syntax? I just want to make sure we don't distribute something in 2.0 that we aren't really planning on supporting. My preference would be to just standardize on the Spring syntax. The namespace declarations are a little verbose, but at least we're consistent across the board. <beans xmlns="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans"; xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance " xmlns:jaxws="http://cxf.apache.org/jaxws"; xsi:schemaLocation=" http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans/spring-beans-2.0.xsd http://cxf.apache.org/jaxws http://cxf.apache.org/schema/jaxws.xsd";> <jaxws:endpoint id="endpoint1" implementor="org.apache.hello_world_soap_http.GreeterImpl " address="http://localhost/services/Greeter1"; wsdlLocation="/wsdl/hello_world.wsdl" /> </beans> -- Dan Diephouse Envoi Solutions http://envoisolutions.com | http://netzooid.com/blog
-- Dan Diephouse Envoi Solutions http://envoisolutions.com | http://netzooid.com/blog
