At this point, all I can say is "soon".   We need a few maven plugins to 
be released first to fix some of the packaging and NOTICE issues.   
Those are in progress.   We also have a few other issues we're working 
out which we hope to finish shortly.

Dan


On Friday 13 April 2007 13:44, Balaji Ravi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It looks like my email didn't get posted to the cxf-dev list, so
> sending it again...
>
> When is cxf planned to be released? Yoko is using the cxf runtime to
> enable corba applications as web services, so for releasing all the
> yoko parts, we would need to have a cxf release. It would be helpful
> for the yoko team to know when you are planning a release...
>
> Thanks
>
> Balaji
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mosur Ravi, Balaji [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, April 09, 2007 3:30 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: A release in the near future ?
>
> Hi,
>
> We are still working on some parts of the tools (idltowsdl &
> wsdltoidl) & the binding, so that we can release complete yoko & not
> parts of it in our next release. Also, we are waiting for the release
> of cxf, since we depend on them for the binding runtime.
>
> CXF-dev: Can you guys give us an estimate of when the cxf release
> would happen?
>
> From my perspective, we should be ready by the end of this month to
> release...
>
> - Balaji
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Matt Hogstrom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, April 09, 2007 3:18 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: A release in the near future ?
>
> I wanted to check and see if you might be releasing a version of Yoko
> in the near future.  As you're probably aware, Geronimo is using Yoko
> as its ORB and we're testing our server for compliance.  We'd like to
> get a release of G out for Java One if possible and it would be
> really useful to have a released version of Yoko.  The only other
> option I can see is to take a copy of Yoko and build our own copy of
> it; which is think is sub-optimal for both projects and I'd really
> prefer to not do that.  If there are others please let me know :)
>
> I don't think we're ready for a release today but when we get to a
> point where it looks like we've passed the appropriate areas that
> include the ORB would y'all be willing to cut a release or a new
> Milestone?
>
> Just looking for some community feedback so we can plan accordingly
> in Geronimo.
>
> Thanks
>
> Matt

-- 
J. Daniel Kulp
Principal Engineer
IONA
P: 781-902-8727    C: 508-380-7194
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.dankulp.com/blog

Reply via email to