I have added the constructor with a MessageObserver back.
On 4/17/07, Dan Diephouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Alright, I think what I'll do is restore the ability to supply your own
MessageObserver. If no MessageObserver is supplied we'll let the binding
create one. This will give the Binding a chance to set up a chain for
scenarios where we don't know the endpoint ahead of time, and allow people
to override this.
That sound good?
- Dan
On 4/17/07, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I have just found a work around:
>
> server = new ServerImpl(getBus(), ep, null, new
> AbstractBindingFactory() {
> public Binding createBinding(BindingInfo binding) {
> return null;
> }
> public void addListener(Destination d, Endpoint e) {
> d.setMessageObserver(chain);
> }
> });
>
> where chain is a previously created ChainInitiationObserver.
> Thought it seems a bit weird ;-)
>
> On 4/17/07, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Same question here :-)
> > I used my own MessageObserver to set up some properties on the message
> > before launching the interceptor chain...
> > Btw, how can I retrieve the BindingFactory ?
> >
> > On 4/17/07, Dan Diephouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi William,
> > >
> > > Mind if I ask a few questions first? I think there are some cases
> where
> > > you
> > > probably do want to specify your own MessageObserver, but this seems
> > > opposed
> > > to the goal of letting a binding manage how endpoint resolution
> happens.
> > > I
> > > would like to unify the two better though - so maybe you can help me
> > > figure
> > > that out :-)
> > >
> > > Why are you specifying a different messageobserver?
> > >
> > > Where were you previously specifying your own messageobserver -
> > > ServerImpl?
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > - Dan
> > >
> > > On 4/17/07, William Tam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi Dan,
> > > >
> > > > Is it possible to specific my own MessageObserver rather than
using
> > > the
> > > > default "ChainInitiationObserver"? Prior to this change, I could
> name
> > > my
> > > > MessageObserver in the constructor of ServerImpl(). I could no
> longer
> > > do
> > > > that. The MessageObserver is now hardcorded in
> > > > AbstractBindingFactory.addListener(). It is not possible for me
to
> > > > override
> > > > it because I don't have control over the BindingFactories.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > William
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > --
> > > Dan Diephouse
> > > Envoi Solutions
> > > http://envoisolutions.com | http://netzooid.com/blog
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Cheers,
> > Guillaume Nodet
> > ------------------------
> > Principal Engineer, IONA
> > Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>
>
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Guillaume Nodet
> ------------------------
> Principal Engineer, IONA
> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>
--
Dan Diephouse
Envoi Solutions
http://envoisolutions.com | http://netzooid.com/blog
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Principal Engineer, IONA
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
