Hi Dan,
Thanks for your note.
I will do a quick update for it.
Cheers,
Willem.
Daniel Kulp wrote:
Willem,
Just a quick note....
Did you give any thought of using an
java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicInteger for the invocations count?
You could then avoid the synchronized stuff.
Dan
On Monday 14 May 2007 03:11, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+public class PerformanceCounter implements PerformanceCounterMBean,
Counter { + private int invocations;
+ private ObjectName objectName;
+
+ public PerformanceCounter(ObjectName on) {
+ objectName = on;
+ }
+
+ public Number getNumInvocations() {
+ return invocations;
+ }
+
+ public synchronized void increase(MessageHandlingTimeRecorder
mhtr) { + invocations++;
+ }
+
+ public ObjectName getObjectName() throws JMException {
+ return objectName;
+ }
