Howcome that thought process doesn't apply to the other cxf jar, which does have a number? And does Apache really force the silly token 'incubator' into every jar name?
> -----Original Message----- > From: Dan Diephouse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, July 30, 2007 11:20 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: manifest jar name > > i.e. without the version name? I think the idea is that people can just > depend on the manifest jar and not have to change any settings in their > build when they upgrade CXF. They'll just drop in a new manifest jar which > will point to the new version. > > Cheers, > - Dan > > On 7/29/07, Benson Margulies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Why is the manifest jar named with a different convention than the > > others? > > > > > > > -- > Dan Diephouse > Envoi Solutions > http://envoisolutions.com | http://netzooid.com/blog
