OK, I'm back and looking at this issue now...
Glen
Am Donnerstag, den 09.08.2007, 10:45 -0400 schrieb Daniel Kulp:
> Glen,
>
>
> On Wednesday 08 August 2007 21:19, Glen Mazza wrote:
> > Am Dienstag, den 07.08.2007, 21:49 -0400 schrieb Daniel Kulp:
> > > So, the question becomes: what can we do to help others get more
> > > involved in the CXF code? That question is open to the
> > > non-commiters as well. What can we do to help you?
> >
> > Personally speaking, I would very much like to move beyond my usual
> > grammar checking and coding suggestions. If people know of simpler
> > tasks that are rather independent of other people's work, things I can
> > do to start moving up the next few steps, emailing me privately or on
> > this list would be appreciated. I plan on spending more time looking
> > at the JIRA's myself next week.
>
> Just a thought, but CXF-884, while not "trivial", is not very hard
> either. The runtime itself already supports it, it's just a matter of
> wiring it into the spring config and there should be a bunch of examples
> of that.
>
> Basically, in the ReflectionServiceFactoryBean (simple frontend), line
> 500, the method:
> protected boolean qualifyWrapperSchema() {
> return true;
> }
> and the over-ridden method in the JaxWsServiceFactoryBean would need to
> be changed from return the hardcoded true/false to pulling info from the
> configs. A svn log on the jaxws.xsd whould probably yield a couple
> past commits that showed how to add config entries. One of those could
> be used as a model. (this should be added to the "simple.xsd"
> processing as well)
>
> The next step, once that is working, would be to add a "-qualified=true"
> flag to the java2wsdl tool. :-)
>
>
> Anyway, just throwing that out as an idea if you're interested. The
> fact that the JAX-WS TCK pretty much requires we use unqualified schemas
> really kind of sucks. I'm not sure if that interests you or not.
>
> Once we switch to working on JAX-WS 2.1, more stuff should pop up as
> well. Theres a bunch of commented out methods in the jaxws frontend
> that will need implementations for 2.1. (grep JAX-WS 2.1) Even
> going through the 2.1 changelog and grabbing anything there is a start.
>
>
