Whatever Benson does here, will eventually also need to be done for JiBX and XMLBeans, correct? If so, it would be nice if this can be done just by setting a java2ws flag for the desired databinding option, rather than duplicate java2ws for each possible option.
Glen Am Donnerstag, den 06.09.2007, 13:04 -0400 schrieb Daniel Kulp: > On Thursday 06 September 2007, Benson Margulies wrote: > > Does it already do Aegis? > > No. I think what James was trying to say is if you want to do that (and > we'd GREATLY appreciate it), base it off the java2ws codebase, not the > java2wsdl code. The java2ws code will replace the java2wsdl stuff once > it's stabilized. > > In anycase, that sounds like a great project. Has a lot of value and > would definitely get you into some good chunks of the code. > > Dan > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: James Mao [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2007 9:50 PM > > > To: [email protected] > > > Subject: Re: java2wsdl for aegis > > > > > > Hi Benson, > > > > > > Java2Wsdl will be replaced by Java2Ws, which is already in the > > > trunk, > > > > so > > > > > maybe you should switch to java2ws > > > > > > James > > > > > > Benson Margulies wrote: > > > > I don't think this should be wildly challenging, does anyone > > > > object > > > > if I > > > > > > have a run at it? > > >
