It turns out to be incomplete! I'll post a bigger one.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dan Diephouse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, September 10, 2007 8:59 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Please review, but don't commit (!) CXF-984 (aegis
control of
> namespace prefixes)
>
> Well actually your patch was much shorter than I had assumed because
it
> only changes the namespaces of the wsdl. So I took a look at it and it
> looks fine! I will see if I commit this later today.
>
> - Dan
>
>
> Dan Diephouse wrote:
> > Hi Benson,
> >
> > I've got this on my agenda to look at. I may/may not get an email
out
> > today to you. But I'm pretty sure I can get you feedback by
tomorrow.
> > Thanks,
> > - Dan
> >
> > Benson Margulies wrote:
> >> CXF-984 provides a new feature: allow services to control the use
of
> >> namespace prefixes.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Now, in theory, no one should want to do this. However, there are
two
> >> reasons why this has come up.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> 1) wsdl readability.
> >>
> >> 2) Primitive clients. If you are concocting a client in, say,
> >> javascript or perl or someplace with a non-namespace-aware XML
parser,
> >> knowing what's going to show up in the prefixes can save a lot of
> >> effort.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> The proposed change here is rather lightweight. I claim that the
> >> AegisDatabinding is the right place for this, since the prefixes
> >> overarch the entire service. Pulling them out of .aegis.xml files
can't
> >> be made coherent.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> The patch I posted needs more unit test, but I wanted to stop and
see
> if
> >> the rest of the group found this entire idea palatable before I
pushed
> >> it any further.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --benson
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Dan Diephouse
> MuleSource
> http://mulesource.com | http://netzooid.com/blog
