Re: [DISCUSS] CXF Roadmap....

[Dan Diephouse]

Its been really hard for me to focus on Aegis the last two weeks as I've been on the road. I promise though I'll be looking through all your questions early next week. :-) - Dan Benson Margulies wrote: I don't know how much anyone else cares about Aegis, but we have a supply of untested Aegis code, and a recent track record of discovering things that got broken on the way from XFire to here. That might be a reason to try to focus some energy. -----Original Message----- From: Bozhong Lin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2007 9:43 PM To: cxf-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] CXF Roadmap.... Eclipse STP has a dependency on java2ws for its code-first approach enhancement, so I think we should consider including java2ws tooling in 2.0.3 release. Right now Eclipse STP guys use 2.1-snapshot for development, which is not inconvenient for them. Other than that, the roadmap looks good to me, certainly plenty opportunitie for people to make contributions in large work items such as XmlBeans or JiBX databinding support. Cheers, Bo Daniel Kulp wrote: I've started a page on the wiki to try and layout some plans for CXF: http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CXF/Roadmap I definitely welcome others to add things to the lists if you think they are doable. Also, what do folks think about the timeframes? Too aggressive? -- Dan Diephouse MuleSource http://mulesource.com | http://netzooid.com/blog