Sure. And Dan K is manually planning to grab commits for 2.0.3. If there were a branch already, (once my karma works) I'd be happy to make some fixes in the 2.0.3 branch and then merge them in the forward direction.
> -----Original Message----- > From: Bozhong Lin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, September 29, 2007 10:17 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: stupid question about branches > > trunk is essentially a branch for 2.1... > > Regards, > Bo > > Benson Margulies wrote: > > Howcome we don't have two visible branches, one for 2.0.3 and one for > > 2.1, right now? > > > > > >
