OK, I'm still researching all of this (and others' related emails) to update the documentation--but I have one question left: Does anyone know, that if I have *both* a Spring configuration file (i.e., the "beans.xml"[1] file in the java_first_spring_support sample below) declared in the web.xml[2] and cxf.xml in the classpath, if *both* will be loaded? Or does the former prevent the latter from being loaded and processed? The CXF source code that covers this is somewhat cryptic but I can research it more thoroughly if necessary.
Thanks, Glen [1] http://tinyurl.com/352htd [2] http://tinyurl.com/3djrlz Am Freitag, den 16.11.2007, 10:53 +0800 schrieb Jeff Yu: > java_first_spring_support sample "beans.xml", it doesn't need to have a > cxf-servlet.xml in the WEB-INF folder. Excellent example. Thanks for pointing it out. > In fact, the cxf-servlet.xml just replace the http transport ID to the > servlet. ( in this case, the cxf-servlet.xml in the > cxf-rt-transports-http module). > Good point. I just noticed there are two different cxf-servlet.xml's, the one above (in META-INF of the CXF JAR) just does the above as you're saying. > The reason why the cxf-servlet.xml in the WEB-INF folder would works, in > this case, the cxf-servlet.xml contains the endpoint configuration such > as<jaxws:endpoint>.., > because we define a "<servlet-name>cxf</servlet-name>" in the web.xml, > by default, it would pick up the "cxf-servlet.xml" in the war.. > Actually, that is exactly how Spring MVC's DispatcherServlet works, xxxx-servlet.xml; but in our CXFServlet class it is hardcoded to look for a "cxf-servlet.xml" no matter what the servlet-name is. > so, to be specific, which case of cxf-servlet.xml do you refer to? For > the cxf-servlet.xml in the WEB-INF folder, it is optional. You can do as > same as java_first_spring_support sample did... > use another xml, and then ask spring's ContextLoaderListener to load it.. > > Thanks > Jeff > > Glen Mazza wrote: > > Do we have a sample anywhere of the syntax of this--specifying the > > Spring app context in the XML, and what such a config file would look > > like? > > > > Thanks, > > Glen > > > > Am Donnerstag, den 15.11.2007, 11:12 -0500 schrieb Jiang, Ning (Willem): > > > >> If you specify the Spring application context in your web.xml file. > >> You do not need to touch any of cxf.xml and cxf-servlet.xml. > >> > >> I admit that CXF provides lots of configuration here. > >> > >> Willem. > >> > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Randy Burgess [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> Sent: Thu 11/15/2007 21:52 > >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> Subject: Re: Difference between cxf.xml and cxf-servlet.xml? > >> > >> I don't even use either file and my services work without any issues. I use > >> applicationContext*.xml files since I was using Spring before CXF and > >> didn't > >> see the point in creating either. > >> > >> Regards, > >> Randy Burgess > >> Web Applications Developer > >> Nuvox Communications > >> > >>
