Am Donnerstag, den 22.11.2007, 22:30 -0500 schrieb Benson Margulies: > > I find it kind of counter-intuitive that we use two different ways of > doing this, instead of one param to specify which type of init to do, > and another param to specift the name of the bean file. >
It's not that bad. We're following the standard web.xml Spring configuration process in the one case (that's how their listener obtains the config file, as opposed to a servlet), and the standard method of sending a parameter to a servlet in another. But you never really need to specify cxf-servlet.xml anyway, because that's the default name that CXF looks for. Glen
