Just to make sure I understand this correctly, when you mean "corba binding", you mean another transport, just like HTTP or JMS, correct?
Thanks, Glen Am Freitag, den 30.11.2007, 16:27 -0500 schrieb Daniel Kulp: > I just want to go on record as saying I COMPLETELY support this and think > the CXF parts of this makes a lot of sense for the CXF project. I've > always felt the binding parts of Yoko should have been done in CXF to > start off with. > > For those that aren't familliar with it, the yoko ws binding stuff > described in the proposal provides some tooling and a corba binding for > CXF. It allows a CXF client (like a JAX-WS/JAXB client, but should > work with the other frontends) to talk to CORBA servers or for a CXF > server to be exposed as a CORBA server so other CORBA apps can talk to > it. > > > Anyway, Matt wants a vote to accept the proposal or not, but I'd like to > leave this open for discussion for a couple days first as I'd like to > hear others thoughts about it. > > Dan
