I thought that the fix was going to be to avoid compiling the generated sources at all, since we don't ship them.
On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 13:44 -0500, Daniel Kulp wrote: > On Wednesday 12 December 2007, Benson Margulies wrote: > > While you are in there, note that once you run ant in a sample, you > > can't run mvn above it until you do 'ant clean' since it tries to > > compile the generated sources and they fail checkstyle/PMD. > > Fixed the building of the samples and I should have fixed the checkstyle > errors. PMD is going to be a lot harder, but I didn't run into a PMD > issue with the few samples I checked. > > Dan > > > > > > On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 12:28 -0500, Daniel Kulp wrote: > > > Benson, > > > > > > Looks like the source build stuff wasn't updated after all the > > > sample were re-organized and shuffled around. > > > > > > And it looks like newer versions of the ant plugin broke the > > > generation of the srcbuild_paths.xml. I'll try and figure out > > > what has happened to it. > > > > > > :-( > > > > > > Dan > > > > > > On Wednesday 12 December 2007, Benson Margulies wrote: > > > > The following lines in common-build.xml suggest that there is a > > > > methodology for running samples against a build tree. Could > > > > someone please elaborate on it? > > > > > > > > I am somewhat confused, as well, by the presence of cxf-server.xml > > > > and well as cxf.xml. Is there some tooling to build webapps using > > > > the former? > > > > > > > > <!-- Setup for building in a source build--> > > > > <available property="srcbuild_paths.file" > > > > value="../../../../target/srcbuild_paths.xml" > > > > file="target/srcbuild_paths.xml" > > > > filepath="../../../.."/> > > >
