If this is good, how would we get it into the code? I don't see a way to tell the DocumentBuilderFactory to use a specific SAX driver.
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 6:34 PM, Dan Diephouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Benson Margulies wrote: > > At this point, the startup performance of the bus is entirely tangled up > in > > Xerces. I'm having a hard time believing that building a DOM from StaX > is > > going to beat Xerces, but if someone else thinks so, I guess I'm game. > > > > Sadly, there are no Apache-compatible XML databases I can see out there, > so > > my idea of 'compiling' all the XML files to DOM trees in some sort of > > persistent store seems impossible. > > > > > Woodstox provides a significantly faster SAX implementation than Xerces. > But the question is - is the startup time in xerces because of > validation or because of parsing? I'm guess the former. > > Its easy to test the Woodstox parser: > > java -Dorg.xml.sax.driver=com.ctc.wstx.sax.WstxSAXParser .... > > Dan > > -- > Dan Diephouse > MuleSource > http://mulesource.com | http://netzooid.com > >
