On Tuesday 08 April 2008, Benson Margulies wrote: > Please read Glen Mazza's remarks on CXF-1509 and pipe up. Glen makes a > case for throwing away the ant tasks instead of cleaning up and > documenting them, which is what I started. If the consensus is with > Glen, I think that we should delete them and stick with the use of > <java> in the doc.
The ONLY benefit that pops to mind is to make it easier to migrate folks from the JAX-WS RI to CXF. The JAX-WS ri provides some ant tasks and I believe ours use pretty much the exact same attributes and such so switching out the ant tasks to the CXF version should be easy. Wouldn't need to figure out the command line stuff. Also, there is the minor issue of knowing the exact CXF class that needs to be called, although they may need to know the exact class name of the ant task to register it anyway. -- J. Daniel Kulp Principal Engineer, IONA [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.dankulp.com/blog
