WSDL2Java JAXWS frontend does not handle enableAsyncMapping for non-Java-named 
operations
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                 Key: CXF-627
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-627
             Project: CXF
          Issue Type: Bug
          Components: Tooling
    Affects Versions: 2.0-RC
         Environment: NA
            Reporter: Steven E. Harris


Per the discussing on the cxf-user mailing list in the thread entitled

  JAX-WS enableAsyncMapping directive not respected
  
http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-JAX-WS-enableAsyncMapping-directive-not-respected-p10292965.html

the class 
org.apache.cxf.tools.wsdlto.frontend.jaxws.processor.internal.OperationProcessor
 uses a method called isAddedAsyMethod() to determine whether it has already 
defined an asynchronous method for a given operation name. Its detection 
heuristic fails for operation names that don't conform to the Java naming 
conventions.

For example, an operation name "some-op" will get munged into the Java name 
"someOp". The isAddedAsyMethod() heuristic looks to see if there are two 
methods in an interface that share the same operation name, but differ from the 
operation name in method name -- when dropped to lowercase. My example here 
meets that criteria, but does not constitute an "extra" asynchronous method 
being present. It's just tripping on the mistaken assumption that an operation 
name and method name will be the same save for case.

We need a better collision detection heuristic here -- perhaps one that takes 
the operation name-to-Java name munging into account.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to