Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> The last option would be to make the "Destination" stuff in http
> plugable.  The jetty stuff just provides a HttpDestinationProvider
> or something into the http module.  Jetty wouldn't subclass the http
> factory or anything.  It just provides functionality into the
> existing http one.
>
> Any thoughts?

Without grasping too well what all these entities are, being too new
to CXF, this last option still sounds like the best solution with the
least coupling.

I take it "destinations" are related to listening endpoints, or
servers? If I'm writing a client, and I have no server-style behavior,
then I should be able to use the HTTP module and have all I need.

If the Jetty module wants to reuse or plug in to parts of the HTTP
module, that's fine; one could combine the two of them or not, just
like any other layered and dependent modules.

-- 
Steven E. Harris

Reply via email to