Hi Richard,
Comment inline
Shaw, Richard A wrote:
If I use the dispatch interface does CXF still pass it through the binding and
transport layers ?
It only skip mashall/unmashall for binding layer, but can not skip the
transport layer, anyway, you need deliver message to remote process
The XML in the sample is a soap message which would suggest to me that it isn't
using the binding because that would normally convert the XML into SOAP.
My use case requires me to talk to various legacy services using more than SOAP.
SOAP payload is not compulsory here, you can use any payload you like.
Thanks very much
Freeman
Richard Shaw
¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤
Richard Shaw
Technical Design Authority - Information Solutions Consultancy
Intelligent Transport Systems
Atkins Highways and Transportation
Woodcote Grove, Ashley Road, Epsom, Surrey, KT18 5BW
Tel: +44 (0) 1372 756407
Fax: +44 (0) 1372 740055
Mob: 07740 817586
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.atkinsglobal.com/its
-----Original Message-----
From: Liu, Jervis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 04 June 2007 03:20
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Skipping some layers in the interceptor chain
Hi Richard,
Can't you use Dispatch interface? Sth like below shall allow you to skip
unnecessary JAXB marshalling ( code snippet from CXF dispatch_provider sample)
QName serviceName3 = new QName("http://apache.org/hello_world_soap_http";,
"SOAPService3");
QName portName3 = new QName("http://apache.org/hello_world_soap_http";, "SoapPort3");
SOAPService3 service3 = new SOAPService3(wsdlURL, serviceName3);
DOMSource domReqPayload = new DOMSource(..................);
Dispatch<DOMSource> dispDOMSrcPayload = service3.createDispatch(portName3,
DOMSource.class, Mode.PAYLOAD);
DOMSource domRespPayload = dispDOMSrcPayload.invoke(domReqPayload);
Cheers,
Jervis
-----Original Message-----
From: Shaw, Richard A [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 2007?6?1? 23:33
To: [email protected]
Subject: Skipping some layers in the interceptor chain
I have the following requirement and was wondering whether anybody
could tell me if it is possible -
1 - I have an XML string which represents the logical message for a
request
2 - I want to use this to make a request on an appropriate service
3 - I want to catch the reply at the XML level without creating a java
object
4 - transform the reply using a XSL stylesheet to be the logical
message of another service
5 - send the logical message to the final service
This is for a generic data fetch. It requests data from a SOA
component, transforms the data into a set message, which is sent to my
datastore component. I don't want to write a new component for every
type of data source that I want to fetch data from.
I have implemented the above using the original Celtix code, but it
has the following inefficiencies -
1 - I load the XML from my config. unmarshal it into an object and
then use that to call my service which will marshal as its first step
3 - the response is unmarshalled into a java object so I then marshal
it back to an XML stream to pass to the XSLT transformer
5 - I unmarshal the transformed XML into a java object and use that to
call my data storage service
Thanks
Richard Shaw
¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø¤º°`°º¤
ø,¸¸,ø¤
Richard Shaw
Technical Design Authority - Information Solutions Consultancy
Intelligent Transport Systems
Atkins Highways and Transportation
Woodcote Grove, Ashley Road, Epsom, Surrey, KT18 5BW
Tel: +44 (0) 1372 756407
Fax: +44 (0) 1372 740055
Mob: 07740 817586
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.atkinsglobal.com/its
This email and any attached files are confidential and copyright
protected. If you are not the addressee, any dissemination of this
communication is strictly prohibited.
Unless otherwise expressly agreed in writing, nothing stated in this
communication shall be legally binding.
The ultimate parent company of the Atkins Group is WS Atkins plc.
Registered in England No. 1885586. Registered Office Woodcote Grove,
Ashley Road, Epsom, Surrey KT18 5BW.
Consider the environment. Please don't print this e-mail unless you
really need to.
This message has been scanned for viruses by MailControl - (see
http://bluepages.wsatkins.co.uk/?6875772)
