Thanks for the extra info, Roman. I was going based on a snippet in the XFire Migration Guide on the WIKI:
"The only other reason not to migrate to CXF that we see is a requirement for Java 1.4. Although, we would encourage users to take a look at using CXF on Java 1.4 via Retrotranslator." Should that last sentence be removed then? -Chris -----Original Message----- From: Roelofsen, Roman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2007 8:49 AM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: Java 1.4 With retrotranslator you only solve language problems like - generics - annotations - etc But CXF also uses new classes introduced in Java5, existing classes got new methods, etc. So the bigger problem is running CXF with a Java4 library. You could use a project like Apache Harmony to fill this gap. But to make the result production ready is a lot of work. Cheers, Roman > -----Original Message----- > From: Christopher Moesel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 17 July 2007 13:44 > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: Java 1.4 > > > Lukas, > > You may be able to use CXF with the help of Retrotranslator. > This is an > open source project that translates 1.5 byte code to > 1.4-compatible byte > code. More info here: > > http://retrotranslator.sourceforge.net/ > > -Chris > > -----Original Message----- > From: Willem Jiang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2007 1:57 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Java 1.4 > > > CXF works on JDK 1.5. We do not support JDK 1.4 yet. > > Lukas Zapletal wrote: > > Hello, > > > > will CXF work under JRE 1.4? It seems the source code isuses 5.0 > > syntax... > > >
