I thought the article was good, but it seemed like the author kept using "XFire" and "CXF" interchangeably. It could be confusing for those who are not familiar with both frameworks-- some questions that *say* XFire really *mean* CXF. Although CXF can be considered "XFire 2.0", it would have been nice to see the CXF branding consistent throughout the article.
-Chris -----Original Message----- From: Glen Mazza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2007 11:28 AM To: [email protected] Subject: OReilly OnJava.com article on Apache CXF FYI list, I don't know if it was posted earlier to this list (searching Nabble didn't seem to turn anything up) but there is a recent O'Reilly OnJava.com interview with two of the Apache CXF founders here you might find interesting/informative to read: http://www.oreillynet.com/onjava/blog/2007/07/apache_cxf_interview_with_ dan.html Regards, Glen
